🔴 SLP: “We Fixed It.”
The SLP opens its scorecard with a strong argument:
the economy has been stabilised since 2021.
Their claims include:
- Moving from a $117M deficit to a $95M surplus
- Achieving the lowest unemployment in recorded history (about 8.8%)
- Introducing a national minimum wage
- Providing tax refunds to 8,000+ citizens
- Raising the income tax threshold to $30,000
- Clearing back pay and government arrears
THE MESSAGE:
“You can trust us with the economy — we repaired it and protected households.”
🟡 UWP: “We Will Grow It Faster.”
The UWP narrative is the opposite.
They argue that SLP slowed the economy and that Saint Lucia needs bigger, bolder, more aggressive expansion.
Their plans include:
- New large-scale investments
- Lower taxes across multiple sectors
- A $75,000 National Health Insurance plan
- Major tourism expansion
- More public-private partnerships
- Faster job creation through infrastructure and foreign investment
THE MESSAGE:
“The country needs speed, scale, and ambition — and only we deliver that.”
⚖️ HEAD-TO-HEAD SUMMARY
| Issue | SLP Approach | UWP Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Fiscal Balance | Stabilise, reduce deficit, move to surplus | Grow economy aggressively |
| Taxes | Relief for households, higher tax exemption | Broader tax cuts |
| Jobs | Youth entrepreneurship, gradual growth | Large investment + fast job creation |
| Investment Style | Measured, accountable, community-focused | Big projects and PPPs |
| Tone | “We delivered already.” | “We will launch bigger things.” |
🧭 WHAT THIS MEANS FOR VOTERS
If a voter values stability, debt control, and steady improvement, SLP’s message resonates.
If a voter prefers rapid development, large-scale investment, and tax-cut-driven growth, UWP’s message stands out.
Saint Lucia must choose between two philosophies:
- Build carefully
- Expand boldly
Both offer benefits — but both come with different risks and trade-offs.
No comments:
Post a Comment