DECISION DAY IN CHOISEUL/SALTIBUS: LET YOUR VOICE SPEAK LOUDER THAN THE NOISE

Today, Choiseul/Saltibus rises to meet one of the most defining moments in our modern political history. After months of motorcades, speeches, promises, allegations, noise, colour, passion, and tension — the moment has finally arrived when none of that matters anymore.

55The power now returns to the people.

From Delcer to Piaye, Mongouge to La Fargue, Reunion to Industry, every voter will help shape the direction of this constituency for the next five years.

1. Vote With Your Head, Not Your Emotions

Campaign heat was real. The tribalism was loud. But when you enter that booth this morning, the only thing that matters is your conscience.

Ask yourself:

• Who is better prepared to lead?
• Who has a record you can examine — before or during politics?
• Who has shown respect for people, responsibility, and the office they seek?
• Who can represent Choiseul/Saltibus with maturity, calm, and credibility nationally?

This election is too important for vibes voting.

2. Look at What You Know — Not What You Were Told

Forget the memes, the WhatsApp forwards, and the shouting on Facebook.

Look at:

• Projects started
• Development secured
• Consistency
• Temperament
• Community presence
• Delivery, not drama

And yes — if a candidate is new, their track record BEFORE politics matters too.
Professional life, leadership qualities, work ethic, and integrity are all indicators of how they’ll perform in office.

3. Don’t Let Last-Minute Distractions Influence You

Elections come with:

• Rumours
• Convenient “breaking news”
• Manufactured chaos
• Fake outrage
• Emotional traps

Choiseul on the Move encourages you to stay steady and grounded.
Ignore the noise. Focus on the facts.

4. Respect the Process — It Belongs to All of Us

Whatever your colour, symbol, or candidate:

• Follow the rules at the polling station
• Don’t intimidate or pressure anyone
• Help elderly voters
• Respect election officers
• Stay patient with the lines
• Keep the peace

Democracy works best when we behave better than the politics.

5. The Power of Choiseul/Saltibus Is in YOUR Hands

Every vote counts.
Every village counts.
Every voice counts.

This constituency has surprised the nation before — and may very well do it again.

Win or lose, one thing remains true:

Choiseul/Saltibus deserves leadership that lifts every home, inspires every child, and protects every future.

Let’s show Saint Lucia what responsible democracy looks like.

A Final Word

Whatever the results tonight, this platform will continue to inform, analyse, question, and hold everyone accountable.

We report honestly.
We call out nonsense.
And we celebrate progress.

Today is not about red or yellow.
Today is about Choiseul/Saltibus.

Go out and VOTE.
Vote wisely.
Vote boldly.
Vote with clarity.

DECEMBER 1st — LET THE PEOPLE SPEAK.

Election Night Nail-Biter: Why Choiseul/Saltibus is Headed for a Photo Finish

On December 1, 2025, all eyes won’t only be on Castries or the big city seats. Quietly but decisively, Choiseul/Saltibus is shaping up to be one of the real nail-biters of this general election. Everything on the ground suggests one thing: this seat is heading for a photo finish.

The days when any seat in Saint Lucia could be called “safe” are gone. Voters are more independent, more informed, and far more willing to punish parties and candidates who take them for granted. Choiseul/Saltibus, with its mix of traditional strongholds and genuine swing areas, is a perfect example of that new political reality.

From Comfortable Lead to Knife-Edge Contest

In the last general election, the margin in Choiseul/Saltibus was not a landslide. It was close enough that a few dozen votes in a handful of polling divisions could have changed the result. That is exactly what makes 2025 so tense. Both the United Workers Party (UWP) and the Saint Lucia Labour Party (SLP) know that this is a seat where every single vote matters.

This time around, the race pits an experienced incumbent against a new but energetic challenger. One offers a record, the other offers a fresh start. Both have roots in the community and both are working overtime to persuade the undecided voter who may only make up their mind in the last week – or even on election day itself.

Incumbent vs. Challenger: Two Different Stories

On one side is the sitting MP, well known across the constituency, with years of visibility, constituency projects and a clear presence in the national political conversation. Supporters point to his accessibility, his experience, and his ability to “get things done” for Choiseul/Saltibus.

On the other side is the challenger, a first-time candidate who is far from a stranger in the community. He carries the energy of someone with something to prove and has been busy walking lanes, visiting homes, listening, and promising a different style of representation. For many younger voters and those who feel left out of past decision-making, that message is attractive.

Micro-Battles in the Polling Divisions

Choiseul/Saltibus is not one political mood. It is a patchwork of communities and polling divisions, each with its own story:

• Traditional strongholds that usually line up behind one party and provide a base of reliable votes.
• Emerging Labour pockets where the SLP has been gaining ground steadily over the last few cycles.
• Real swing boxes where a shift of 10 to 20 votes can flip the outcome for the entire constituency.

It is in these swing boxes that the real drama lies. Turnout, last-minute persuasion, and even the mood on talk shows and social media in the final days can tip the balance. A handful of families changing their minds, or a group of youth deciding to vote for the first time, could decide who becomes the next MP.

The Issues Turning Up the Heat

Voters in Choiseul/Saltibus are not only talking about red and yellow. They are talking about very real, very personal issues that affect daily life:

• St Jude Hospital and health care – frustration with delay, blame across administrations, and a call for honesty and results.
• Roads and basic infrastructure – from Delcer to Mongouge and La Fargue, people want to know who really fought for better roads and safer access.
• Jobs and cost of living – rising prices, limited job options and the struggle to make ends meet are front and centre in many conversations.
• Respectful politics – many residents are tired of name-calling, insults and fake news. They want mature leadership that can disagree without destroying the community spirit.

Why This Looks Like a True Photo Finish

Put it all together and the picture is clear: Choiseul/Saltibus is heading for a tight result. We have:

• A constituency with a history of close margins.
• An incumbent with strong name recognition but also serious questions to answer.
• A challenger with energy, local roots and the backing of a motivated national campaign.
• Polling divisions where a small shift in votes will decide the winner.

This is why, on election night, Choiseul/Saltibus is likely to be one of the last seats that analysts will confidently call. Expect phrases like “too close to call”, “neck and neck” and “we have to wait for the final box”.

A Final Word to Voters

However you intend to vote on December 1, 2025, remember this: your “X” is part of a much bigger story. Choiseul/Saltibus will not just be electing an MP; it will be sending a message about the kind of politics we want going forward.

Before you put pen to paper:

• Look carefully at each candidate’s behaviour, not just their promises.
• Think about who has shown respect, consistency and genuine care for people on the ground.
• Vote, not out of fear or anger, but with a clear mind and a long-term vision.

When the last box is counted at the Choiseul Police Station and the final figures are read out, the result may be close, but the message can be loud and clear: Choiseul/Saltibus believes in strong views, fair play, and peaceful, mature democracy.

```0

✅ EDUCATIONAL VOTER NOTICE – CHOISEUL/SALTIBUS

As we get closer to Election Day, it’s important that every voter knows exactly how to correctly mark their ballot. Your vote must be marked clearly, once, and in the box of the candidate you support.

Below are TWO examples to guide you:

1️⃣ VOTE FOR KEITHSON CHARLES LIKE THIS:

2️⃣ VOTE FOR BRADLY FELIX LIKE THIS:

🗳️ REMEMBER:

✔️ Only place ONE X next to ONE candidate
✔️ Keep your mark inside the candidate’s box
✔️ A spoiled ballot cannot be counted
✔️ If you need help on Election Day, ask the presiding officer — assistance is your right

Let’s make every vote count!
Choiseul/Saltibus—be informed, be confident, and vote correctly.

A GIANT. A TRAILBLAZER. A MAN OF THE PEOPLE

On the heels of national decision-making, we pause to celebrate a figure whose influence has quietly shaped communities, opportunities, and lives across Saint Lucia.

Today, we proudly honour our Man of the Year — a leader whose impact goes far beyond construction and business.

👉 Read the full tribute here:

https://rayneau.blogspot.com/2025/11/rayneau-gajadhar-saint-lucias-man-of.html?m=1

What the NDP Victory in St. Vincent Could Mean for St. Lucia’s December 1 Elections

The political landscape in the Caribbean shifted dramatically last night when the New Democratic Party (NDP) swept to victory in St. Vincent and the Grenadines, ending the 24-year reign of the Unity Labour Party. It was a result that stunned regional observers, electrified Vincentians, and sent ripples across every island where elections are on the horizon — including right here in Saint Lucia.

With Saint Lucians heading to the polls on December 1, many are now asking: Will this political earthquake in St. Vincent influence the mood and momentum in Saint Lucia? Let’s take a closer look.

   A Regional Mood for Change?

Across the Caribbean, elections tend to feed off each other. When a long-standing government falls — especially one that many thought “could never lose” — it creates a psychological shift among voters in neighbouring islands.

The NDP’s win tells a compelling regional story:
People are increasingly willing to break long political traditions when they feel their economic and social needs aren’t being met.

This alone could energize certain voter groups in Saint Lucia, particularly those who have been quietly dissatisfied but unsure whether real change is possible.

   Saint Lucian Undecided Voters Now Have a Real-Time Example

Many undecided Saint Lucians have been torn between sticking with what they know or taking a chance on something new.
But now they are looking across the sea and seeing Vincentians making that leap.

Here’s the difference this makes:

• It normalizes the idea of changing governments after long control.
• It reassures hesitant voters that “change” doesn’t automatically equal chaos.
• It creates a powerful sense of regional momentum that opposition parties can tap into.

When your neighbour successfully chooses a new direction, it makes the idea more real — and more possible — for you.

   Campaign Narratives in Saint Lucia Just Shifted

Political parties in Saint Lucia will quickly adjust their messages following the SVG outcome.

• Opposition forces will point to St. Vincent as proof that voters everywhere are rising up against high cost of living, unemployment, and governance fatigue.
• The incumbent will likely reframe the campaign to emphasize stability, cautioning voters against “experimenting” during uncertain economic times.

But one thing is clear:
The St. Vincent results have rewritten the narrative heading into our final campaign weekend.

    Economic Pressures Are a Shared Regional Reality

Cost of living. Food prices. Youth unemployment.
These issues hammered Ralph Gonsalves in SVG — and they’re hammering Saint Lucia too.

Voters now have a real-time example of a population that voted primarily on bread-and-butter issues. This could amplify economic concerns as the centre of conversation in Saint Lucia over the next few days.

   A Wake-Up Call for Political Leaders in Saint Lucia

NDP’s victory is a reminder that no government is safe, no matter how entrenched.

For Saint Lucia’s political class, the SVG landslide is a warning flare:

• Do not take your base for granted.
• Do not assume the electorate is asleep.
• Do not underestimate the power of frustrated youth.

Saint Lucians are watching exactly how quickly a tide can turn when voters feel ignored or taken for granted.

Final Thoughts

While Saint Lucia is not St. Vincent — our political culture, party loyalties, and national issues differ — the psychological impact of last night’s election cannot be ignored.

What happened in St. Vincent has injected a new energy into our region. It has reshaped the final days of campaigning here at home. And it has, without question, intensified the curiosity of Saint Lucian voters who now want to see whether the “SVG effect” will spill over into our own ballot boxes.

December 1 now feels even bigger.
The region is watching.
And Saint Lucia may very well be the next chapter in this unfolding Caribbean story of political renewal.

Golden Years Under Pressure: The Quiet Struggles of Older Choiseul/Saltibus Residents:

For many older residents of Choiseul/Saltibus, the “golden years” don’t feel very golden at all.

Behind the smiles at church, in the shop line, or sitting on a roadside bench, there’s a quiet struggle playing out every day — stretching small social security payments, paying for doctor visits and medication, and trying to retire with dignity in a world that’s getting more expensive by the month.

Let’s talk honestly about it.

   Living on Social Security: When the Money Just Can’t Stretch

For most seniors in Choiseul/Saltibus, the main lifeline is a monthly pension from the National Insurance Corporation (NIC) or a small government assistance grant.

The problem?
Prices have gone up on everything:

• Food at the shop or supermarket
• Cooking gas and electricity
• Transport to town for clinic visits or to collect medication
• Basic household items and personal care products

Many older people are left doing harsh calculations:

“Do I pay the light bill… or do I buy my tablets?”
“Can I afford fresh fruits this week… or must I just buy flour and rice?”

Some receive strong support from children and family. Others are alone or have relatives who are struggling just as much. Pride also plays a role — many elders don’t like to “beg,” so they quietly cut back on meals, skip important purchases, or run up credit at the village shops.

   Health Care Costs: Free on Paper, Expensive in Reality

People often say, “But health care is free at the public hospital.”
In real life, older residents know that staying healthy still costs money:

• Medication shortages mean buying tablets at private pharmacies.
• Transport to Soufrière, Vieux Fort, or Castries for tests and specialist visits is not cheap.
• Private doctors are sometimes the only option to get seen quickly.
• Special diets for diabetes, hypertension, or heart conditions are more expensive than a simple “bread and butter” life.

For a retired farmer or shopkeeper on a small pension, a single test or private consultation can wipe out half the month’s income. Many seniors in our district “self-manage” serious illnesses because they simply cannot afford consistent follow-up care.

   Retirement Security: When Work Never Really Ends

Retirement in Choiseul/Saltibus is not always a rocking chair and a peaceful sea breeze.

A lot of older residents:

• Still farm small plots, rear a few animals, or sell a little produce to survive.
• Help raise grandchildren so their own children can work.
• Take on casual work — cooking, washing, odd jobs — just to add a few dollars to the pension.

Very few had access to private pensions, long-term savings plans, or financial planning when they were younger. Many worked in informal jobs: farming, construction, domestic work, shop work, or small hustles that never contributed to NIC.

Now, in their 60s, 70s, and 80s, they are facing:

• Uncertainty: “If I get sick, what will happen to me?”
• Anxiety: “If my child loses their job, can they still help me?”
• Fear of dependence: Nobody wants to feel like a burden.

   The Emotional Toll: Loneliness and Worry

Money and health are only part of the story.

There is also:

• Loneliness when children move away or migrate.
• Stress when bills pile up.
• Shame when elders feel they “shouldn’t be struggling at this age.”

Some older residents stay strong through faith, community groups, church, or friendly neighbours who check in and share a meal. But we must admit: too many are suffering quietly behind closed doors.

   Where Do We Go From Here?

If we care about our elders — the same people who built Choiseul/Saltibus with their hands, their sweat, and their sacrifices — then we can’t just shrug and say, “That’s life.”

We need:

• Stronger, more realistic social security benefits that reflect today’s cost of living.
• Better access to affordable health care and medication, especially for chronic illnesses.
• Community-based support systems so no elderly person in our district is left hungry, lonely, or neglected.
• Financial education for younger generations, so history doesn’t repeat itself.

Most importantly, we need to listen.
Sit with the older people in Roblot, Piaye, Mongouge, Dacretin, Caffiere, Saltibus, Delcer — and ask them what help they truly need. The solutions for retirement security, health care, and social support must include their voices.

Because a community that honours its elders is a community that respects its own future.

Mikey Pilgrim Speaks - National Address Analysis Michael “Mikey” Pilgrim Speaks: Reading Between the Lines of His National Address

When former Prime Minister Michael “Mikey” Pilgrim appeared on national television last night, Saint Lucia paused. Like him or not, Pilgrim is one of those political figures who still knows how to command attention – calm tone, careful wording, and the quiet authority of someone who has sat in the hot seat before.

But beyond the polished delivery, his statement carried layers of meaning: part warning, part reminder, and part repositioning. This wasn’t just about talking to the nation for old times’ sake. It felt like a deliberate move to influence the mood of the country in the final stretch before a critical general election.

A Return to Statesmanship – or a Strategic Comeback?

Pilgrim presented himself as the elder statesman returning to offer guidance. He spoke of national unity, political maturity and the need for leaders to rise above petty division. The tone was gentle, reflective and reassuring – almost nostalgic for a different political era.

Still, this was no harmless “hello.” The subtext was clear: “I am still here. I am still watching. And my voice still matters.” In a campaign where credibility and experience are on the ballot, that reminder is not accidental.

Soft Words, Sharp Edges

Pilgrim avoided direct attacks, but he did not avoid critique. Through references to rising frustration, declining respect in public debate and the need for honest leadership, he gently pointed at the shortcomings of the current political climate.

He did it in classic Pilgrim style – not by calling names, but by painting a picture of what leadership should look like. Anyone listening carefully would have heard the message: the country deserves better than noise, anger and ego.

The Voice of Stability in an Uncertain Moment

One of the strongest themes in the speech was stability. In a time of early elections, unfinished national projects and growing anxiety over health care and the economy, Pilgrim stepped into the frame as the calm, steady hand.

Whether you agree with his past record or not, this address clearly aimed to remind Saint Lucians of a time when he was the one steering the ship – and to invite comparison with the present.

A Direct Appeal to Young Voters

Interestingly, he spoke directly to the youth. Pilgrim urged young Saint Lucians to register, to vote, and to demand accountability from those who seek power. That section was not just sentimental; it was strategic.

The youth vote will help shape the outcome of the next election. By reaching out to them, Pilgrim positioned himself not just as yesterday’s leader, but as someone still engaged with tomorrow’s electorate.

“Country Before Ego, People Before Party”

Perhaps the most important line of the speech was his call for leaders to put country before ego, and people before party. It sounded like simple wisdom, but it landed like a quiet rebuke to the entire political class.

To many listeners, it raised questions about decision-making at the top – including the timing of the election and the state of key national projects. Others heard it as a challenge to the Opposition as well, urging them to keep their own politics clean and focused on issues.

Why Now? Timing Is Everything

The timing of this address is no coincidence. With days to go before the polls, Pilgrim’s statement:

• Steadying undecided or nervous voters,
• Reinforcing his own legacy as a national figure,
• And quietly influencing the tone of the final campaign days.

Social media reactions show that both sides tried to claim parts of his message to suit their narrative. That alone tells you how carefully the speech was crafted.

Final Thoughts: Pilgrim Didn’t Just Talk – He Shifted the Energy

In a season of noise, slogans and sometimes vicious attacks, Michael “Mikey” Pilgrim stepped in with a calm, measured reminder of what leadership is supposed to sound like. His address may not have contained fiery reveals or dramatic threats, but it quietly changed the temperature of the conversation.

Whether you see him as a mentor, a critic or a political operator, one thing is certain: he chose his moment carefully – and Saint Lucia was listening.

Choiseul on the Move will continue to track the national mood, the speeches, and the strategies as election day approaches. Stay tuned for more in-depth breakdowns and community perspectives.

Four Days to Go: How Choiseul/Saltibus Is Shaping Up Ahead of December 1st

With just four days before Saint Lucia goes to the polls, the Choiseul/Saltibus race is shaping up to be one of the most unpredictable and electrifying contests of the 2025 general election. Both candidates—Keithson “Kiffo” Charles (SLP) and Bradley “Flex” Felix (UWP)—are digging in for a final push, and based on what we’re observing on the ground, this race could go right down to the wire.

This is not a prediction—that comes on November 30th—but an honest, balanced look at where things seem to be heading as of now.

Delcer (I1): Flex Territory… but Some Noise Around the Edges

Delcer continues to stand firm behind Flex. He has deep roots there, and the numbers traditionally start in his favour.
Yes, whispers are circulating that Kiffo is “making moves” in the area, but many residents believe the few new faces showing him love might be non-voters simply playing along.
Delcer remains UWP’s safest box.

Mongouge (I2): A Clear Kiffo Win—But Not the Landslide It Could Have Been

Mongouge is undeniably leaning red this cycle.
Kiffo is expected to take this box comfortably, but the momentum isn’t at the level it could have been.
Why?
Some residents quietly resent the lack of support Kiffo’s family gave to a former UWP hopeful from the area. That issue—small to some, big to others—has cooled what could have been a roaring Mongouge wave.
Still, Mongouge belongs to Kiffo.

La Fargue (I3): A Swing Box Edging SLP

La Fargue is once again the heart of the fight.
Right now, it appears to be leaning toward Kiffo, with signs that he may surpass Pauline’s 2021 performance.
One reason? Cedars—that tight-knit enclave seems ready to throw stronger support behind the SLP this time around, shifting the balance.

Dacretin (I4): A Tug-of-War With No Clear Winner

Dacretin looks like a battlefield—plain and simple.
Two highly influential community figures, one on each side, are working overtime to secure their candidate’s victory.
At this stage:
It could go either way.

Roblot (I5) & Piaye (I9): The Multipurpose Center Factor

These two polling divisions appear to be leaning toward Flex—and not because of party loyalty alone.
Residents are still upset that their multipurpose centers have remained closed for over two years.
That frustration is real, and it’s translating into votes.
Unless something dramatic happens, both boxes favour Flex as a form of punishment for what many view as neglect.

Jetrine (I7A–I7B): Kiffo Stronghold

There’s no debate here—Jetrine is overwhelmingly behind Kiffo.
His support there is deep and dependable.

Dugard (I6): A Kiffo Blowout

Dugard is lining up behind Kiffo in a big way.
This is expected to be another one of his strong boxes district-wide.

Saltibus (I8): The Wild Card of the Valley

Saltibus is the box to watch.
Rumors indicate Flex may see increased support, mainly because many relatives of former candidate Pauline—who had leaned SLP last time—may return home to UWP in this election.
If this shift holds, Saltibus becomes the game-changer.

So Where Does This Leave Us?

The race is tight—tighter than many expected.
Both candidates have strengths. Both have weaknesses. And both have pockets of passionate supporters.

If Flex wins big in Saltibus and Delcer, he could walk away with the seat.

If Kiffo energizes Mongouge and secures La Fargue convincingly, he could claim victory.

At this point, the election in Choiseul/Saltibus will not be decided by emotion or noise—it will be decided by turnout, ground strategy, and whether each candidate can protect their strongholds while chipping into the opponent’s territory.

This is simply our analysis—not gospel, not prophecy.
But one thing is certain:
Choiseul/Saltibus is heading into a nail-biting finish.

Stay tuned for our Final Predictions Post on November 30.

⭐ THE ECONOMY: Stability vs Expansion

The economy is always the heart of any manifesto — and here, the SLP and UWP paint two very different pictures of Saint Lucia’s present and future.

🔴 SLP: “We Fixed It.”

The SLP opens its scorecard with a strong argument:
the economy has been stabilised since 2021.

Their claims include:

• Moving from a $117M deficit to a $95M surplus
• Achieving the lowest unemployment in recorded history (about 8.8%)
• Introducing a national minimum wage
• Providing tax refunds to 8,000+ citizens
• Raising the income tax threshold to $30,000
• Clearing back pay and government arrears

THE MESSAGE:
“You can trust us with the economy — we repaired it and protected households.”

🟡 UWP: “We Will Grow It Faster.”

The UWP narrative is the opposite.
They argue that SLP slowed the economy and that Saint Lucia needs bigger, bolder, more aggressive expansion.

Their plans include:

• New large-scale investments
• Lower taxes across multiple sectors
• A $75,000 National Health Insurance plan
• Major tourism expansion
• More public-private partnerships
• Faster job creation through infrastructure and foreign investment

THE MESSAGE:
“The country needs speed, scale, and ambition — and only we deliver that.”

⚖️ HEAD-TO-HEAD SUMMARY

Issue	SLP Approach	UWP Approach
Fiscal Balance	Stabilise, reduce deficit, move to surplus	Grow economy aggressively
Taxes	Relief for households, higher tax exemption	Broader tax cuts
Jobs	Youth entrepreneurship, gradual growth	Large investment + fast job creation
Investment Style	Measured, accountable, community-focused	Big projects and PPPs
Tone	“We delivered already.”	“We will launch bigger things.”

🧭 WHAT THIS MEANS FOR VOTERS

If a voter values stability, debt control, and steady improvement, SLP’s message resonates.

If a voter prefers rapid development, large-scale investment, and tax-cut-driven growth, UWP’s message stands out.

Saint Lucia must choose between two philosophies:

• Build carefully
• Expand boldly

Both offer benefits — but both come with different risks and trade-offs.

Understanding the UWP’s EC$75,000 NHI Plan: What Voters Should Know

The United Workers Party’s 2025 manifesto, “Reclaiming Our Future”, puts health care front and centre. One of the biggest headline promises is a National Health Insurance (NHI) scheme offering up to EC$75,000 in annual coverage for every Saint Lucian. The plan is listed both in the party’s seven-point SOS programme and in the healthcare chapter of the manifesto as “National Health Insurance with up to $75,000 in annual coverage.”

It sounds big and bold – especially in a country where one serious illness can wipe out a family’s savings. But what does this promise really mean in practice? This article breaks down the proposal in simple terms so that voters can weigh the benefits against the unanswered questions.

1. What exactly is being promised?

According to the manifesto and supporting public statements, the UWP is committing to:

• National Health Insurance for all – every Saint Lucian would be covered under a new NHI system.
• Up to EC$75,000 in annual coverage per person – this is the headline figure that has grabbed public attention.
• Stronger health infrastructure – completion of a “state-of-the-art” St. Jude Hospital, district hospitals in Soufrière and Dennery, upgrades to wellness centres, and a modern health information system with electronic health records.

In simple language, the party is saying: “No matter your income, you will have an insurance umbrella of up to $75,000 a year to help pay for your health care.”

2. What services would the $75,000 cover?

The manifesto confirms the size of the coverage but does not spell out in detail the full “basket of services.” Usually, National Health Insurance plans have a clear list of benefits, for example:

• Doctor and specialist visits
• Hospitalisation and surgery
• Diagnostic tests (X-rays, scans, blood tests)
• Maternity care
• Chronic disease management (diabetes, hypertension, cancer follow-up)
• Medication on an approved list

For voters, one key question is: Will the NHI cover all of these, or only some? Another big question is whether overseas treatment, airlifts or specialised care will be covered at all, especially for conditions that cannot be treated locally.

3. How will the NHI be funded?

Any serious NHI system must answer the money question. Around the world, these schemes are usually funded through:

• Payroll contributions from employees and employers;
• Government revenue (taxes, levies, or a dedicated health fund);
• Premiums or co-payments from individuals;
• or a combination of all three.

The manifesto states the intention to provide up to $75,000 in annual coverage but does not yet give a detailed financing formula. Without that information, it is hard to judge:

• Whether workers will face new payroll deductions;
• Whether businesses will have to pay an additional employer contribution;
• Whether government will rely on higher taxes, new levies, or more borrowing to fund the scheme;
• And most importantly, whether the plan is financially sustainable year after year.

A national promise of $75,000 per person sounds generous, but if the funding model is not clearly explained, voters are effectively being asked to sign a blank cheque.

4. Can the health system actually deliver $75,000 worth of care?

Insurance on paper is one thing. Access to real, quality care is another.

Saint Lucia’s public health system is still under pressure. St. Jude Hospital is not yet fully commissioned. OKEU has struggled with bed space, staff shortages, and equipment challenges. Many wellness centres do not have regular doctors or a full range of services. Private care exists, but it is often costly.

For NHI to work in a meaningful way, three things must happen at the same time:

1. Facilities must be upgraded – functioning hospitals, well-equipped clinics, reliable ambulances and diagnostic services.
2. Human resources must be strengthened – more doctors, nurses, lab technicians, pharmacists and support staff, properly paid and retained.
3. Systems must be modernised – electronic health records, clear referral pathways, and strict standards for quality of care.

If these pieces lag behind, then even with a $75,000 insurance limit, patients could still face long waiting times, limited services and the need to travel overseas at their own expense.

5. What are the potential benefits if the plan is done properly?

If designed and funded well, National Health Insurance could bring important advantages:

• Protection from catastrophic health bills – fewer families pushed into poverty by one illness.
• More equal access to care – not only the well-off or well-connected get timely treatment.
• Better public health outcomes – earlier diagnosis, better management of chronic diseases, and a healthier workforce.
• More predictable health financing – the State and households can plan better when costs are pooled.

In that sense, the UWP’s focus on National Health Insurance is responding to a real need in the country. The question is not whether health reform is necessary – it is. The real issue is whether this particular design is realistic and backed by a clear implementation roadmap.

6. The big questions voters should ask

As campaigns heat up and slogans get louder, voters should cut through the noise and ask a few calm, serious questions:

• Is the $75,000 figure based on actuarial analysis, or is it mainly a political headline?
• Will I, as a worker or business owner, be required to pay a contribution, and how much?
• What exact services are covered under the NHI basket? What is excluded?
• How will this new NHI interact with existing public services and private insurance plans?
• What is the timeline for rolling out the scheme, and what are the milestones?
• Most importantly: will the promised hospital and clinic upgrades happen before or after the NHI goes live?

7. Conclusion: Hopeful idea, but details matter

The EC$75,000 National Health Insurance proposal is one of the most eye-catching promises in the UWP manifesto. For households struggling with medical expenses, it speaks directly to their fears and dreams – the hope that no one will have to choose between treatment and putting food on the table.

However, real health reform lives and dies on the details: how it is funded, how it is phased in, how strong the supporting health infrastructure is, and how transparent the government is with the public about costs and trade-offs.

As Saint Lucians head toward the polls, it is worth celebrating ambitious ideas – but it is even more important to demand clear answers, honest numbers and a realistic plan behind every promise. Only then can voters truly decide whether the $75,000 NHI plan is a genuine game changer or just another campaign headline.

CHOISEUL ON THE MOVE – A RESPONSE TO PAUL WARD’S CALLOUS COMMENT

Choiseul on the Move stands firmly and unapologetically against the disgraceful comment posted by Paul Ward describing a candidate as a “womier.”

Let’s make this absolutely clear: this is the kind of gutter-level campaigning that Choiseul/Saltibus has REJECTED for generations.

For months now, both candidates—Bradley Felix and Keithson “Kiffo” Charles—have carried themselves with commendable composure. Whatever their political differences, they have respected the people, respected the process, and respected the dignity of the constituency.

It is therefore shameful—deeply shameful—that while the candidates themselves maintain standards, others like Paul Ward are dragging the campaign into the mud with childish insults and derogatory labels.

Calling Bradly “ringcomb” was wrong. We said so.
Calling Keithson a “womier” is equally disgusting—and we say so again.

This is not Choiseul culture.
This is not Choiseul politics.
This is not Choiseul pride.

For someone who claims to support political maturity, Paul Ward’s remark is nothing but a cheap attempt to divide, belittle and demean. And it shows no respect to voters, no respect to the candidates, and certainly no respect to the integrity of the Choiseul/Saltibus campaign.

We will not normalize this.
We will not pretend it is harmless.
We will not sit quietly while people try to pollute the atmosphere our constituency has worked hard to maintain.

Politics is not a fish market.
People’s reputations are not toys.
And Choiseul/Saltibus is not a playground for personal insecurities dressed up as “campaign talk.”

At a time when our community is trying to rise above the toxicity that usually surrounds politics, it is sad and disappointing that Paul would choose to drag us backward.

We call on ALL supporters—SLP, UWP, undecided, young, old, whoever—to reject this kind of nastiness outright. Hold your corner, support your candidate, defend your issues, but leave the personal insults out of it.

Choiseul/Saltibus is better than this.
The candidates are better than this.
And we expect BETTER from anyone who claims to speak on behalf of the people.

Choiseul on the Move remains committed to clean, respectful, issue-based political commentary.
We hope Paul Ward reflects, retracts, and rises above this shameful display—because our constituency deserves far more than callous, reckless talk masquerading as political commentary.

---

The Early Election and the Unfinished Hospital: What Really Drove Philip J. Pierre’s Timing?

When Philip J. Pierre took office in July 2021, he looked the nation in the eye and made a defining promise: St. Jude Hospital will be delivered. Not patched up. Not half-done. Not talked about. Delivered.

Fast-forward 4 years and 5 months later, instead of presenting a fully functional hospital ready to accept patients, the Prime Minister called a snap election — almost a full year early — and handed over what is essentially a completed building, with the critical step of commissioning pushed into the future.

It’s a political move that has left many Saint Lucians scratching their heads. The question practically asks itself:

Why rush to elections if you are so close to finishing the job?
Why not stay the full term, commission St. Jude properly, and run on a completed promise?

Something about this timing… doesn’t sit right.

Let’s dig deeper.

1. The Building vs. The Hospital: A Subtle but Powerful Distinction

Politically, handing over a building is far more convenient than handing over a hospital. A building is a photo op. A ribbon-cutting moment. A shiny visual for campaign posters.

But a commissioned hospital?
That requires:

• staffing
• equipment installation
• safety certification
• operational readiness
• completion of minor but essential systems
• and accountability for any delays

All of these can be scrutinized. All of these can become weaknesses.

So instead, the country got the easier version — the building without the burden of operational responsibility.

2. The Early Election: Political Strategy or Strategic Avoidance?

Let’s be honest:
Calling an early election is never a coincidence. It is always a calculation.

Here are three likely motivations:

A. Strike While the Optics Look Good

A gleaming building at St. Jude, completed by Rayneau Gajadhar and CIE, offers strong visuals for the campaign trail. It allows the government to say:

“We delivered what the last administration couldn’t.”

Even if the use of the building is still months away.

B. Avoid the Risk of Commissioning Delays

Commissioning a hospital is complex. If something dragged beyond 2025 or ran into technical hurdles, it would hand the Opposition a perfect election weapon.

By calling early elections, the PM avoids that risk altogether.

C. Control the Narrative Before Economic Pressures Deepen

Cost of living, fuel prices, electricity frustration, and social tension have been building. Heading into 2026 with these issues unresolved could hurt the government far more than going now — with a symbolic victory in their hands.

3. Was an Early Election Necessary?

Constitutionally, no.

The current term legally runs until September 2026. That means:

• 10 more months to finalize St. Jude
• 10 more months to commission it
• 10 more months to walk into elections with a ribbon cut, staff hired, and the South finally seeing services restored

Instead, the country is being asked to elect a government before the job is done.

If the goal was truly to complete St. Jude fully, time was on their side.

So why give the people a building instead of a functioning hospital?

4. The Rat That Many Saint Lucians Smell

Saint Lucians are not naïve. Across communities, WhatsApp chats, radio talk shows, and social media timelines, the sentiment is building:

“Something not adding up.”

A few of the red flags the public is raising:

• If the hospital was so close to commissioning, why not finish it?
• Why call an early election when you are months away from your biggest political victory?
• Is the government avoiding something behind the scenes — technical reports, readiness issues, approval delays, internal conflicts?
• Was the handover timed for votes, not health care?

People are voicing what many are thinking:
The timing feels more political than patriotic.

5. The Bigger Question: What Do Saint Lucians Deserve?

Saint Lucians have waited 15 long years for a proper hospital in the South.
Fifteen years of pain, distrust, and political ping-pong.

They deserve not only a building.
Not only a handover ceremony.
Not only a campaign talking point.

They deserve a fully functioning hospital, complete, commissioned, staffed, and serving the people.

Not promises of “later.”
Not “after elections.”
Not “coming soon.”

Final Word: A Political Masterstroke or a Strategic Escape?

Calling early elections while handing over an incomplete hospital opens up a deep national conversation about accountability, priorities, and political timing.

Whether this decision was:

• a bold calculated move,
• a defensive maneuver,
• or a way to avoid the pressure of full commissioning…

…one thing is clear:

Saint Lucians will judge whether they received a hospital or just a headline.

And in this election, optics may not be enough.

Are Voters Really Being Dumped in Choiseul? A Calm Look at the Allegation — and the Bigger Picture**

In recent days, whispers have grown louder about voters from the Laborie constituency being “dumped” into Choiseul/Saltibus. It’s the kind of allegation that spreads fast, especially in the heat of an election season. And while emotions can flare, it’s important for our community to sift through the noise and understand what’s actually happening — or what might appear to be happening — before drawing conclusions.

YRight now, there is no verified public evidence confirming large-scale transfers of voters from Laborie into Choiseul/Saltibus. That does not mean concerns should be dismissed; it simply means the allegation remains unproven. What we can do, however, is place the issue in a wider national context — because Choiseul is not the only district where people are raising eyebrows over voter activity.

1. Election Seasons Always Bring High Suspicion Levels

Across Saint Lucia, every election cycle brings its share of claims: bussing, boundary games, fake addresses, and mysterious spikes in polling-division numbers. These concerns are not unique to Choiseul/Saltibus. They have surfaced in Castries Central, Dennery, Vieux Fort, Gros Islet — almost everywhere. Historically, many of these accusations turn out exaggerated or misunderstandings of normal population movement.

The point? Allegations alone aren’t proof — but they should prompt responsible inquiry.

2. Voter Transfers Happen Regularly — and Legally

People move. People change addresses. Housing projects open. Families shift. Young adults relocate to live with relatives or partners. These real-life mobility patterns often cause sudden changes in constituency voter lists. And unless the Electoral Department sees evidence of intentional wrongdoing, these transfers are treated as routine updates.

So before we jump to the political explanation — that voters are being “dumped” — it’s important to consider the personal-mobility explanation too.

3. Other Constituencies Are Seeing Movement Too

The Choiseul/Saltibus conversation did not appear in isolation. Reports from other parts of the island suggest:

• Registrations rising sharply in some districts
• Transfers increasing as election day approaches
• Parties on both sides accusing the other of strategic registration

This pattern is common worldwide — parties mobilise supporters to register early, update their address, and ensure they appear on the correct list. When this is done transparently and in accordance with the law, it is completely normal.

When done deceptively, it becomes voter manipulation.

That is why facts — not rumours — matter.

4. Why Choiseul/Saltibus Must Stay Alert but Calm

Choiseul/Saltibus is a swing-heavy constituency with volatile margins. Any perceived shift triggers alarm quickly. That is understandable. But instead of panic, here’s the productive approach:

✔ Ask for clarity from the Electoral Department

The public is entitled to know the number of new registrations, transfers, and verifications.

✔ Compare this year’s polling-division numbers with past lists

If there is a spike, the numbers will show it.

✔ Demand transparency, not chaos

Parties, agents, and community leaders must work together to ensure integrity — not weaponise suspicion.

✔ Keep the focus on voter education

The real danger to Choiseul is not imported voters — it’s rejected ballots and low turnout.

The Bottom Line

Right now, the allegation that voters are being moved from Laborie into Choiseul/Saltibus remains unverified. What is clear is that Saint Lucia is experiencing heightened election-season anxiety across multiple constituencies, and Choiseul is part of that national mood.

Rather than jumping to conclusions, let’s do what strong communities do:

• Watch carefully
• Ask questions
• Demand transparency
• Stay informed
• And above all — make sure every eligible Choiseulien casts a valid vote on December 1st

If solid evidence emerges, it deserves a full, serious investigation. Until then, awareness, vigilance, and calm analysis are our best tools.

Before You Vote: The Qualities Every Electorate Must Look For in a Candidate

As the campaign season heats up and political promises fill the air, it’s easy to get swept away by charisma, color, and catchy slogans. But elections aren’t beauty contests or popularity shows—they’re about leadership, integrity, and the future of our communities.

Before casting that all-important vote, the electorate must take a hard look at who they’re voting for and what they truly stand for. Here are the essential qualities and traits every voter should look for in a candidate:

1. Integrity Above All

A candidate’s integrity is the foundation of trust. Look for someone who has a proven record of honesty and transparency, both in public and private life.

If a candidate twists facts, dodges questions, or changes stories to suit the moment, that’s a red flag. Leadership without integrity is leadership headed for corruption.

2. Vision and Competence

A good leader doesn’t just criticize what’s wrong—they clearly outline how to make things right.

The electorate must ask: Does this candidate have a realistic plan? Can they manage resources wisely? Do they understand the needs of the people they wish to serve?

A vision without competence is just talk. Competence without vision is chaos.

3. Commitment to Service, Not Self

Public service is exactly that—service. A candidate must show genuine concern for people, not personal gain.

Watch how they treat ordinary citizens when cameras aren’t rolling. Do they listen? Do they follow up?

A self-serving politician will always find excuses; a servant-leader will always find solutions.

4. Courage and Accountability

It takes courage to speak truth to power, to stand up for what’s right even when it’s unpopular.

A true leader doesn’t blame others or hide behind committees—they take responsibility.

Voters should ask: When faced with tough decisions, will this person do what’s right or what’s convenient?

5. Emotional Intelligence

Leadership isn’t just about intelligence—it’s about empathy.

The best candidates are those who understand people’s struggles, communicate respectfully, and stay calm under pressure.

A candidate who listens more than they speak and values dialogue over division will always make better decisions.

6. Track Record and Community Connection

Promises are easy to make, but past actions speak louder than words.

What has the candidate done for the community before election time? Have they shown up only when votes are needed?

A person who has consistently contributed to community growth—without political reward—is someone worth trusting with greater responsibility.

7. Respect for Law and Institutions

Every democracy thrives when its leaders respect the rule of law, independent institutions, and due process.

Beware of candidates who think they’re above the system or use power to intimidate or silence others.

A good leader strengthens institutions—not weakens them.

In Closing: Choose Wisely

Elections decide the direction of a nation. The next time a candidate comes knocking, don’t just listen to what they say—watch what they’ve done, and how they live.

Vote not for the loudest voice, but for the most consistent one.

Vote for character, not color.

Vote for vision, not vanity.

Vote for service, not slogans.

The future of your community depends on it

A Batting Rethink Is Overdue for the West Indies Team

For decades, the name West Indies cricket carried an aura of fear, respect, and admiration. Bowlers like Holding, Ambrose, and Walsh brought thunder, but the brilliance of batsmen like Viv Richards, Brian Lara, and Shivnarine Chanderpaul defined the team’s soul. Today, that sparkle has dimmed — and it’s becoming painfully clear: a serious rethink of our batting approach is long overdue.

The Problem Isn’t Just Technique — It’s Mindset

Modern cricket demands adaptability, patience, and smart shot selection. Too often, West Indies batters collapse in clusters, playing rash strokes at critical junctures. The power-hitting culture, while exciting in T20s, has seeped into Test and ODI formats where restraint and situational awareness matter most. Cricket isn’t just about sixes — it’s about surviving sessions, building partnerships, and showing discipline.

The truth is, the regional circuit no longer molds players for the long game. Young talents are being fast-tracked through franchise leagues, where entertainment trumps endurance. As a result, many promising batsmen arrive on the international stage without the foundation or patience to construct a big innings.

Where the System Is Failing

The domestic setup has struggled to produce batters who can consistently perform under pressure. Weak pitches, limited exposure to quality bowling, and inconsistent coaching structures all contribute to this. The regional tournaments must become a true breeding ground — not just a formality.

Investment in mental conditioning, data analysis, and technical mentorship must become non-negotiable. Why can’t each territory have a batting academy led by a former great? Imagine a structure where players are groomed by legends like Lara or Sarwan, learning to build innings the Caribbean way — with flair and fight.

A Call for Leadership and Vision

The West Indies Cricket Board and coaching staff must stop papering over cracks. Changing captains or shuffling the order won’t fix the deeper issues. The team needs a clear batting philosophy — one that values temperament as much as talent.

Players must be taught that every run matters. Whether it’s grinding in a Test match or pacing an ODI chase, the approach must be thoughtful, not impulsive. Leadership must inspire pride in wearing maroon — not just participation in another tournament.

The Way Forward

A batting rethink means more than technical tweaks. It’s a cultural shift — from carefree hitting to calculated aggression. The Caribbean still breeds natural talent, but talent without structure leads to waste.

If the West Indies want to reclaim their cricketing glory, they must invest in the art of batting again. Discipline must become fashionable, patience must become powerful, and pride must return to the crease.

The world still remembers the roar of the maroon. It’s time our batsmen learned to make it echo again — through courage, craft, and consistency.

One Rule for All: A Call for Fairness at the Choiseul Parish Cemetery

For decades, the Choiseul parish cemetery has stood as sacred ground — a place where families lay their loved ones to rest with dignity, reverence, and spiritual closure. But today, that sense of sacred fairness is under serious threat. What should be a space governed by order, compassion, and transparency has instead fallen into confusion, inconsistency, and troubling signs of favoritism.

The issue centers on the allocation of tomb spaces — a matter the Church itself previously admitted had become unmanageable due to years of poor planning. Tombs were placed haphazardly, permissions were issued spontaneously, and the cemetery evolved without a proper long-term plan. As a result, the parish administration later announced that no new tombs would be permitted moving forward. A difficult but understandable decision… if it were applied fairly.

“A cemetery is sacred ground — not a playground for favoritism.

 One rule, one standard, one people.”

But this is where the problem lies.

Despite the official policy, multiple families have been flatly denied permission to build tombs for their recently departed loved ones — while, at the very same time, other individuals are quietly being granted approval. These permissions are not publicly announced, not explained, and not justified. Yet they continue.

This selective treatment is not only unfair — it is deeply disrespectful to the grieving families who have had to navigate their loss without clarity, compassion, or consistency.

No parish should ever operate in secrecy or favoritism, especially when the matter involves the final resting place of its own people.

What’s Good for One Should Be Good for All

The Choiseul community is not asking for special treatment. Parishioners are not demanding privileges. All they are asking for is fairness — the same standard applied across the board without exception, preference, politics, or quiet backdoor decisions.

If the Church’s position is that the cemetery is full, then it must be full for everyone — not full for some and open for others.

If new tombs cannot be constructed, then no one should be allowed to build.

And if there is still space — or if certain plots can still be approved — then all parishioners must have equal access to that opportunity.

Anything less is a betrayal of trust.

A Parish Must Reflect Its People

Parishioners are the heart of the Church. They are the ones who support the parish, attend Mass, volunteer, tithe, maintain traditions, and sustain church life from generation to generation. To see their families treated unfairly in their hour of mourning is not only hurtful — it is unacceptable.

We say this with respect, but with unwavering clarity:
the administration of the Choiseul parish must correct this imbalance immediately.

• Either reinstate a fair, transparent approval process for all parishioners…

• Or stop granting permissions altogether, without exceptions, without favorites, without secrecy.

The community deserves honesty and consistency. Families deserve the right to bury their loved ones without politics or favoritism. And the Church, above all, must uphold the principles it teaches — justice, compassion, equality, and truth.

A Final Word to the Parish Administration

This message is not written out of anger, but out of commitment to fairness and love for the community. People simply want what is right: one rule for everyone. If the cemetery is closed, let it be closed for all. If space exists, let the entire parish have equal access.

Because what is good for the geese must also be good for the gander.

The people are watching.
And they are asking, respectfully but firmly, for the Choiseul parish to do the right thing.

“Justice is not justice when it applies to some and not to all. The parish must rise to the standard it preaches.”

DAY 2: The Economic Scorecard — Growth or Recovery?

From Promises to Reality — A Citizen’s Look at the SLP Record

Published on: November 12, 2025
By: Choiseul on the Move Editorial Team

The Numbers That Tell a Story

The Saint Lucia Labour Party’s (SLP) From Promises to Reality report opens with an impressive headline:

“Saint Lucia’s economy is the largest in the Eastern Caribbean Currency Union, representing over one-quarter of total GDP.”

It proudly cites three consecutive years of positive primary balances, a reduction of outstanding payables from $130 million to $30 million, and steady economic growth between 3.9% and 4.9% in 2023–2024.

At first glance, it’s a compelling narrative — an image of strong fiscal discipline and stability under Prime Minister Philip J. Pierre. But dig a little deeper, and the question emerges: Is this true growth, or simply recovery from crisis?

Growth vs. Recovery: Understanding the Context

When the administration took office in July 2021, the economy was in freefall — a staggering 22.9% decline in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The following years saw inevitable rebound growth across the region, not just in Saint Lucia.

So while 2022 and 2023 recorded double-digit expansions, economists warn that such numbers largely represent a “bounce back effect” — a recovery of what was lost, rather than new growth.

In reality, Saint Lucia’s GDP in constant terms is only now returning to pre-pandemic levels. Tourism, construction, and public expenditure have been the main engines, but private sector investment remains sluggish and inflation continues to erode disposable income.

Debt Management and Fiscal Balances

The manifesto report highlights a $95 million primary balance surplus in FY 2023/24, compared to a –$117 million deficit in 2021/22. This is indeed a major fiscal turnaround, aided by the removal of arrears, increased revenue collection, and a sharp reduction in capital expenditure delays.

However, much of this success stems from record remittances and inflation-driven VAT revenue, not necessarily expanded production or exports. Meanwhile, the public debt remains around $4 billion, hovering near 80% of GDP — still above regional sustainability thresholds.

The government deserves credit for discipline, but the challenge ahead is growth-led balance, not austerity-led balance.

Employment and Productivity

The report celebrates record employment of 97,000 people and an 11% unemployment rate in early 2024, the lowest on record. Yet, many of these jobs fall under short-term contracts, STEP projects, or public service absorption, not private enterprise expansion.

Saint Lucia’s productivity index has not seen significant improvement, and youth unemployment—though reduced—remains double the national average. Without productivity growth, wage increases and cost-of-living pressures could quickly cancel out these statistical wins.

Where the Economy Feels It Most

Ask the ordinary Saint Lucian: does this feel like a thriving economy?
The answers are mixed. Prices for fuel, groceries, and basic goods remain high; electricity and transportation eat into wages; and the much-touted tax relief barely offsets the new 2.5% Health and Security Levy.

In other words, macroeconomic success hasn’t yet translated into microeconomic relief.

Our Takeaway

The Pierre administration deserves recognition for stabilizing finances and restoring investor confidence. But it’s misleading to label this a “thriving economy.”

What we’re seeing is recovery, not revolution — the regaining of balance after crisis, not the leap toward transformation promised in 2021.

Tomorrow on Day 3

We dive into the heart of every kitchen-table conversation — Cost of Living & Tax Relief: VAT Removed, but Prices Rising?

Can tax cuts truly outweigh rising inflation? And is the average Saint Lucian really keeping more money in their pocket? Stay tuned.

Two Visions, One Constituency: Bradley vs Kiffo and the Future of Choiseul/Saltibus

As election fever slowly builds across the island, the people of Choiseul/Saltibus find themselves at the heart of a fascinating political crossroads. On one side stands Bradley Felix, the seasoned parliamentarian with a track record of calm leadership and measured governance. On the other, Keithson “Kiffo” Charles, the newcomer with a bold message of renewal and a promise to end what he calls “a season of silence.”

Both men present distinct visions for the constituency — one grounded in continuity, the other in change. But what do their messages really say about the kind of leadership each offers?

🟨 Bradley Felix: Steady Hands, Proven Path

Felix’s message is simple: results over rhetoric. His vision emphasizes continuity, inclusiveness, and a quiet strength born of experience. In his recent interview with Lisa Joseph, he reminded voters of what was achieved between 2016 and 2021, urging them to “sift through the fluff and the bluff” and focus on tangible results.

He positions himself as:

• A non-discriminatory representative who serves all constituents, regardless of political affiliation.

• A tested leader who knows how to navigate the system to bring development to Choiseul.

• A man focused on family values and youth, believing progress must be sustainable and rooted in community strength.

• Someone who wants to keep Choiseul high on the national agenda, ensuring continued investment and attention.

Felix’s tone reflects confidence, stability, and pride — a belief that leadership should be about quiet delivery rather than noisy confrontation.

🟥 Keithson “Kiffo” Charles: The Sound of Renewal

In contrast, Kiffo’s maiden speech was fiery, passionate, and people-driven. He declared that “the season of silence is over,” positioning himself as the voice of a constituency ready to reclaim its influence.

Kiffo’s promises centered on renewal, opportunity, and social empowerment, including:

• Creating jobs and economic opportunities for youth and local entrepreneurs.

• Revitalizing roads, health centers, and community infrastructure.

• Supporting farmers and fishers with better access to tools and markets.

• Making education and skills training a top priority.

• Promoting unity across political lines, while holding leadership accountable.

His vision taps into emotion — one that speaks to those who feel left out or unheard. It’s the voice of renewal versus the comfort of stability.

⚖️ The Core Difference: Continuity vs Change

At the heart of this political duel is a simple question:

Do the people of Choiseul/Saltibus want to continue building on what exists, or do they want to start fresh with new energy and ideas?

Bradley Felix represents the continuation of a known formula — steady governance, gradual development, and experience in navigating the national system.
Kiffo Charles represents the break from the old, the emergence of a younger, louder generation eager to leave a mark.

🌴 What the Voters Must Consider

Voters will have to decide which vision best aligns with their lived reality.
Do they feel progress has been steady enough under Bradley’s stewardship?
Or do they share Kiffo’s view that the people’s voices have been ignored for too long?

Either way, the upcoming election promises to be one of the most defining moments in Choiseul’s political story — not just about personalities, but about the direction of leadership for the next decade.

✍️ Final Thought

Both men love Choiseul. Both claim to serve without discrimination. Yet their roads to the same destination couldn’t be more different.
Whether voters choose the calm of continuity or the energy of change, one truth remains — Choiseul/Saltibus is awake, alert, and ready to make its voice heard.

🇱🇨 When the Numbers Tell a Story: Chastanet and Frederick Agree—$240 Million from CIP!

Politics, as fiery as it gets in Saint Lucia, sometimes produces rare moments of accidental agreement between rivals. That’s exactly what happened this week when former Prime Minister Allen Chastanet and current Minister of Housing Richard Frederick—two men who rarely share a political sentence without sparks—ended up confirming the same financial truth: the Citizenship by Investment Programme (CIP) brought in an astonishing $240 million between March 2024 and March 2025.

  Richard Frederick’s Revelation

In a recent public address, Minister Frederick proudly declared that Saint Lucia’s CIP generated EC$240 million in just one year, describing it as one of the programme’s strongest performances since inception. His tone was triumphant—proof, he said, of investor confidence and the administration’s success in managing the programme.

“The CIP brought in between March 2024 and March 2025 about $240 million. Are you hearing me? Two hundred and forty million dollars in one year!”

That statement was meant to showcase economic achievement—a feather in the government’s cap and a signal that Saint Lucia was performing well on the international investment front.

  Chastanet’s Counterpunch

But politics is a chess game, and Allen Chastanet, the former Prime Minister and leader of the opposition, immediately seized the same figure to challenge the government’s credibility.

Speaking on the campaign trail, he echoed Frederick’s own words to drive home a question Saint Lucians have been asking for months:

“Phillip J. Pierre said he made $240 million from the CIP. So, where is the money? Why do we still have the 2.5% Health and Security Levy? Why are gas prices still high?”

Chastanet argued that if the country indeed raked in such a large sum, there should be visible relief for citizens—lower fuel costs, lighter taxes, and better services. His wider point was that the government, despite record revenue, still claims it cannot complete major projects like St. Jude Hospital, which he said now carries a combined price tag of nearly $400 million over four administrations.

  The St. Jude Factor

Here’s where the debate gets even more interesting. Chastanet told supporters that the government called early elections because it cannot finish St. Jude Hospital.

According to him:

• Dr. Kenny Anthony’s administration spent around $100 million,
• Philip J. Pierre’s administration has since spent $300 million,
• And yet, the hospital remains unfinished.

While the exact numbers may differ depending on which report one cites, few would deny that St. Jude has become a symbol of prolonged political failure. For over sixteen years, the hospital has been rebuilt, redesigned, relocated, and re-budgeted—each administration pointing fingers while the people wait for a functioning facility.

  The Common Thread: Accountability

Regardless of political color, one fact now stands beyond dispute—$240 million flowed through the CIP in a single year. That’s Richard Frederick’s number, and Allen Chastanet’s argument simply amplifies it.

What separates them is not the data, but the direction of the question:

• Frederick says, “Look how well we’ve done.”
• Chastanet asks, “Then why is the country still struggling?”

And that, Saint Lucians, is where accountability meets reality. It is not enough to boast of millions earned; the nation must also see where and how those millions were spent.

  The Bigger Picture

As Saint Lucia heads toward the December 2025 general elections, both men—one in government, one seeking to return—have handed voters a gift: proof that the money exists. The challenge now is to demand clarity.

If $240 million entered our national coffers through the CIP, the public deserves to know:

• How much went into the National Economic Fund?
• How much was used for actual projects?
• And how much remains in reserve or unaccounted for?

  Final Word

For once, Chastanet and Frederick are singing the same note, even if to different tunes. The CIP is producing big money, but unless that wealth is matched by transparency, relief, and visible national development, Saint Lucians will continue to ask—loudly and rightfully—“Where is the money?”