Bradley Thanks Choiseul-Saltibus – The Journey Continues with Flex!

Four years in opposition have been no easy road, Bradly laments; they have tested his strength, sharpened his vision, and deepened his love for the people of Choiseul-Saltibus. He continues, "Yet, here I stand—stronger, more determined, and more fired up than ever before!"

"To every single person who stood in line, braving the heat, the wait, and the uncertainty just to place that powerful “X” for Flex—I THANK YOU." He is very much aware that trust is not taken lightly and that each vote was not just a mark on a ballot, but a voice declaring that Choiseul-Saltibus deserves leadership with heart, courage, and unwavering dedication.

This journey is far from over. In fact, it’s only the beginning of the next chapter. "The fire still burns within me, the mission to serve and uplift this community still lives on, and the love I have for you—my people—remains unshakable!" Flex reiterates

Flex reminds his constituents that they have weathered storms before, and together, we will rise again. Like the sun that sets only to rise brighter and stronger at dawn, Flex is ready to rise for Choiseul-Saltibus!

Bradly is confident that as we continue this program of progress, unity, and empowerment, he promises this: "Our best days are ahead. With your continued support, we will build on the foundation we’ve started and create a future that every Choiseul-Saltibus resident can be proud of."

The journey continues, the passion is alive, and together, we will make it happen.

Flex 💛

"The sun sets only to rise again. We will rise again!"

Living on Crown Land for 30+ Years? Here's What You Need to Know…

There’s been a lot of talk lately about people who have been living on Crown land (government land) for decades. Some believe that after 30 years, the land becomes theirs automatically. But let’s set the record straight:

Under the law of Saint Lucia, this is not true.

Even if you've lived on Crown land for 30, 40, or even 50 years — that land does not become yours unless the government gives you legal permission or a title.

So what happens to long-time squatters?

From time to time, the government may run programs to “regularize” these situations. That means: ✅ Offering people a chance to buy the land at a reduced cost

✅ Helping with official documents or leases

✅ Granting legal title in special cases

BUT — this is not a right, and it doesn’t happen automatically. It’s more like a special offer or amnesty. The government is not legally required to give you the land — it’s a choice they make to help regularize informal settlements.

A Bottom Line:

Living on Crown land for decades doesn’t make you the owner.

Only the government can give you legal title.

If you’ve been living on Crown land for many years, look out for official government programs and take advantage of them when they come!

Help spread the truth. Let’s all stay informed and encourage each other to work within the law.

#CrownLand #KnowYourRights #StLuciaLaw #HousingFacts #PublicAwareness #RayneauOnTheMove

Why Students Are Failing Math—and What We’re Getting Wrong

Picture this:

The school bell hasn’t rung yet, and a group of students is huddled over a notebook, frantically copying down last night’s math homework. Not because they didn’t care to do it, but because somewhere along the way, they were taught that points matter more than understanding. That ticking a box is more important than mastering a concept.

Sound familiar?

It should. It’s the daily reality in too many classrooms across the St Lucia—and it's a significant factor behind the concerning trends in Math performance in recent CPEA exams.

Let’s be honest. Math isn't the enemy here. It's the system.

Just ask any frustrated student who scored poorly despite putting in hours of homework… or any burnt-out teacher grading yet another worksheet filled with guesswork instead of real growth.

The truth is, we’ve built a school culture obsessed with compliance.

Finish the homework. Memorize the method. Ace the test.

And if you don’t? Well, better luck next time.

But here's a radical idea—what if we threw that tradition out the window?

That’s what one teacher, Jake, did. No more one-and-done tests. No more homework that students rushed through or copied at the last minute. Instead, he built a classroom based on feedback, retakes, and most importantly—growth.

And guess what?

The results were everything we hoped for in Math education.

Higher test scores. More confident students. And teachers who weren’t running on empty.

The Numbers Don’t Lie

Recent data from Saint Lucia's 2024 CPEA results highlight the issue. While the overall national mean improved to 77.08%, the Math scores told a different story. The national mean for Mathematics was 73.09%, lagging behind other subjects like Science, Language, and Social Studies, which all scored above 77.9% .

This stagnation in Math contrasts with significant improvements in other subjects, indicating a systemic issue in how we approach Math education.

So why are so many of our classrooms still stuck?

Because we’re clinging to a system that’s not working.

A system where students are racing for grades—not understanding.

Where fear of failure is stronger than the desire to learn.

CPEA scores are telling us something. They’re a wake-up call.

Not that our kids aren’t smart. Not that they’re lazy.

But that we need to rethink how we teach Math.

Imagine a classroom where students can make mistakes without penalty. Where they can take a second shot at a concept, and actually get better because of it. Where learning is the goal—not just passing.

That’s the kind of shift we need. From points to progress.

From performance pressure to purpose-driven learning.

Because if we want different results, we have to dare to teach differently.

It’s not just about Math. It’s about giving our students a fighting chance to love learning again.

Call to Action:

Parents, engage with your child’s teacher about how feedback is utilized in the classroom. Teachers, consider implementing one small change toward growth-based learning next school year. It could make all the difference in how our children perform… and more importantly, how they learn.

PUTTING PIERRE FIRST - By Anonymous

Philip J Pierre

Tension is rising in Choiseul about who the selected candidate for the St. Lucia Labour Party will be for the forth-coming general elections. What started as ‘promising’ that four individuals had indicated their willingness to contest the seat became less so as a fifth individual joined the race long after the deadline for applications had been closed and the initial four individuals had been interviewed (at least once).

WHY WAS THE PROCESS REOPENED?

Anxiety immediately started growing once the latest application was accepted and the individual had been interviewed. Constituents then began asking various questions, among them:

Is the last applicant the preferred candidate of ‘the parry’?

What advantage(s) does the last applicant bring, given that he was the current district representative’s attaché?

Is it that the initial four candidates lack the social and political profile of ‘the party’?

It is fair to say that none of these questions has been answered either by the ‘the party’ or the constituents themselves.

THE IMPLICATIONS

Months after the intimal interviews, no announcements have been made regarding the situation as speculation and division grow among the constituents. Understandingly so, the memories of the last general elections have resurfaced with the emphasis again placed on the party executives’ disregard for the wishes of the local electorate. What has emerged is a complex web of possibilities none of which brings any advantage to the selected candidate at wining the incumbent parliamentary representative at the general elections as things stand on the ground. The key issues at play seem to be:

A GENUINE commitment on the parts of individual contestants to support whoever is selected.  Given that it is alleged that at least one contestant disclosed at an interview that he will not support the lone female contestant, genuine commitment seems unlikely.  

The publicly known fact that TWO of the current contestants, including the last contestant, DID NOT support the selected candidate in the last general elections certainly raises concern.

The CAPACITY of the individual contestants to influence their base to support the selected candidate whoever that may be, is also a mammoth challenge.

The EFFORT AND RESOURCES required to REUNITE a clearly divided local electorate, and in addition, TO FIGHT THE OPPOSITION  while can yield benefits will have to be tremendous. Petty roadside contracts may not suffice.

THE FINAL DECISION vs POPULAR CHOICE

Who becomes the selected candidate remains any body’s guess. But clearly, the only clue offered so far lies in the selectors’ decision to reopen the process of selection well after the set deadline. Whether or not facilitating/selecting that last contestant reflects popular choice is a different matter that matters a WHOLE LOT. So the hope is that the process reflects popular choice, which at the moment is very visibly NOT the last contestant. 

PUTTING THE PM FIRST

The catch phrase of the Prime minister has been PUTTING THE PEOPLE FIRST, and certainly, the many projects and initiatives of Prime Minister so far, reflect that mantra. So the expectation is that the phrase will hold for the people of Choiseul as it pertains to their preferred choice of candidate reflected by survey after survey. Until the outcome of the selection process i'm PUTTING PIERRE FIRST.

Editor's note : The author of this piece requested that his name be withheld.

In Defense of Boldness: Allen Chastanet's Call Wasn't Folly—It Was Leadership

 In its June 21 editorial, The Jamaica Gleaner painted St. Lucia’s Opposition Leader Allen Chastanet as a political maverick lost in a “twilight zone” for merely daring to question the effectiveness of CARICOM. But if asking uncomfortable questions that reflect the lived frustrations of many CARICOM member states is “folly,” then perhaps we need more of that so-called madness.

Let’s be honest: CARICOM, for all its noble ideals, has underperformed. Its well-documented “implementation deficit,” glacial pace of integration, and habit of overlooking the concerns of smaller member states are not myths—they are recurring frustrations. Mr. Chastanet, in speaking to fellow OECS leaders, voiced the silent discontent many leaders are too diplomatic—or too fearful—to utter. That is not recklessness. That is leadership.

The Right to Question

The editorial insists that Mr. Chastanet’s question—“Would we be better off negotiating bilateral agreements rather than remaining in CARICOM?”—is dangerous. But is it really? Asking whether CARICOM still works as intended is not the same as calling for its destruction. In fact, it is a necessary question that any responsible leader should be willing to examine—especially given the deepening challenges of regional inequality, climate change, food insecurity, and global political shifts.

Let us not forget that institutions must evolve or risk irrelevance. CARICOM was formed in 1973. Today’s geopolitical landscape, economic dynamics, and youth expectations are not the same. If CARICOM is beyond criticism, then it is already beyond saving.

A Voice for the Marginalized

Mr. Chastanet’s recollection of feeling disrespected and ignored during CARICOM deliberations is not an isolated complaint—it is a reflection of a structural imbalance in the regional bloc. Smaller states like those in the OECS often feel like silent partners in a conversation dominated by the more populous countries. If the voices of smaller members are not being taken seriously, what incentive is there to remain bound to a structure that doesn’t evolve?

Rather than attack the messenger, regional leaders and commentators ought to examine the message. Instead of dismissing Chastanet’s words as irresponsible, the region should ask why he—and many others—feel this way. Ignoring the problem doesn’t make it go away.

The Real Risk: Complacency

The Gleaner rightly points out that CARICOM is

 an “imperfect institution”—but then uses that as a shield against change. That logic is exactly why regionalism has stagnated. If not now, then when is the time to evaluate the usefulness of our institutions? And who better than someone who has sat at the highest levels of CARICOM decision-making to raise those questions?

Let’s also not overlook the irony: the same editorial admits Jamaica once withdrew from the West Indies Federation—yet still feels entitled to scold others for contemplating similar paths. Jamaica, too, knows what it means to question regional alliances when national interest is at stake.

A Wake-Up Call

Far from being a loose cannon, Allen Chastanet is acting as a catalyst for an overdue conversation. The Caribbean doesn’t need cheerleaders for the status quo. It needs leaders unafraid to challenge institutional inertia and spark debate about how we actually move forward—together or otherwise.

So no, Allen Chastanet hasn’t lost his way. He’s just walking a road fewer have the courage to tread.

Forgotten Communities, Forgotten People: A Wake-Up Call from Roblot, Choiseul

As a concerned citizen of Roblot, Choiseul, I cannot sit in silence any longer.

With general elections looming—constitutionally due in 2026 but rumored to be called earlier—it's time to reflect, reassess, and rise. For too long, we the people of La Maze, Debreuil, Roblot, and Riviere Dorée have been fed crumbs under the guise of development. We've been pacified with footpaths, drains, and temporary grass-cutting jobs, while our communities cry out for real transformation—education, empowerment, and opportunity.

Just take a look around.

In Roblot, our community center remains locked, untouched and underutilized. Built with taxpayer dollars, it sits there as a silent monument to broken promises—walled off from the very people it was intended to serve. What kind of leadership allows such a resource to lie idle in the face of growing unemployment, especially among our youth?

This isn’t just a Roblot issue. La Maze, Debreuil, and Riviere Dorée have suffered the same fate: neglected, under-resourced, and spoken about only when it’s time for votes. The cries of our young people are deafening. They are not lazy—they are idle because no one has given them the tools or opportunities to rise.

Instead of youth development programs, instead of skills training centers, what did we get?

A bar.

Yes, a bar—soon to be built on what was once prime government land near Choiseul Secondary School. Land that could have been transformed into a vocational training center, a small business incubator, a community IT hub—anything that contributes to the development of human capital. But that would’ve required foresight. That would’ve required politicians to put people over personal gain.

The problem isn’t a lack of resources. The problem is a lack of vision.

And now, as another election cycle creeps upon us, the same tired tactics will return. We’ll be told once again to vote for roads, for handouts, for favors. But we are not fools. We are not beggars. We are citizens with a right to thrive, not just survive.

It’s time we demand better.

What are these politicians offering for the advancement of the people—not just their party base, but the entire community? Where are the proposals for literacy and computer classes? Where are the workshops on entrepreneurship, agriculture, hospitality, and trades? Where are the plans for our youth, our single parents, our unemployed men and women?

If they have no plan for our development, then they are not worthy of our votes.

We must be vigilant. We must be bold. We must ask the tough questions and demand real answers—not flashy slogans or last-minute giveaways. The campaign trail will be noisy, but let us listen not to the volume of their voices, but to the substance of their message.

No more blind loyalty. No more empty promises. No more selling our dignity for a ride to town or a free t-shirt.

This time, Roblot, La Maze, Debreuil, and Riviere Dorée will not be silenced.

We will rise.

We will speak.

And we will vote not for politicians, but for progress.

🔴 SLP’s Choiseul/Saltibus Gamble: Back to the Drawing Board?

A little birdie tells us that the Saint Lucia Labour Party (SLP) has unofficially narrowed its focus to two potential candidates for the Choiseul/Saltibus seat in the upcoming general elections: Darrion and Pauline. If this is true, then it’s safe to say that the SLP is on course to hand the seat right back to incumbent Bradly Felix of the United Workers Party (UWP)—on a silver platter.

One fired-up SLP supporter didn’t mince words, quipping in full Kwéyòl:

"Bradly kay bat tousel Darrion ek Pauline an menm tan!"
Translation? Bradly will beat them jointly. Ouch.

Let’s unpack why this decision could be politically suicidal for the Labour camp.

Darrion: From Attaché to Candidate?

Many in the constituency know Darrion as the former loudest cheerleader for Bradly Felix—not just a supporter, but what some described as “Bradly’s attaché.” His sudden shift to Labour has left even SLP loyalists puzzled, with murmurs of hypocrisy and backstabbing swirling across La Fargue and beyond.

It doesn’t help that La Fargue—his own backyard—is reportedly lukewarm about his candidacy.
So, we must ask the hard question: does Darrion even have a base?
If he’s struggling to command the support of his own neighbors, how will he penetrate the UWP’s strongholds?

To quote a local observer:

Espoir Mal Papie!”
A hapless hope indeed.

Pauline: History Repeats Itself?

As for Pauline, let’s talk numbers:
In the 2016 General Election, she was defeated by Bradly Felix by over 400 votes—and that was with a full campaign and the momentum of being a fresh face.
Fast forward to 2025, and the landscape looks even dimmer.

Her disengagement with grassroots supporters over the last four years is a glaring red flag. Constituents whisper about her:

• Rare visits
• Poor delegation of responsibilities
• Recycling of contracts within the same inner circle
• Eroding trust from key community mobilizers

According to one influential foot soldier:

“Pauline wants to run the show alone. She doesn’t trust anyone with real responsibility.”

Even in her traditional strongholds in the eastern part of the constituency, support is said to be waning.

The Keithson Question: Why Bypass a Rising Star?

Now, here’s where it gets interesting.
Keithson Charles, who has made serious inroads into Bradly’s base, is being mysteriously sidelined. Why?

Yes, elections are near. Yes, a lot of work would need to be done to bolster his readiness. But Keithson was around before Darrion even blinked Labour red. So why this sudden leapfrogging?

Could it be political favoritism? Internal party dynamics? Or is SLP simply betting on the wrong horses?

Looking Ahead: December 8, 2025?

This blog strongly predicts the next general election will be held on Monday, December 8, 2025—timed to coincide with the handover of the St. Jude Hospital. With National Day falling that same weekend, the SLP will likely seek to turn victory (or survival) into a nationwide celebration from December 13–15.

But here’s the rub: If Darrion or Pauline is leading the charge in Choiseul/Saltibus, that “celebration” might just skip this constituency.

Final Thoughts

If the SLP is serious about reclaiming Choiseul/Saltibus, they need to rethink their strategy.
Darrion’s credibility issues and Pauline’s disconnection from her base won’t cut it. Bradly Felix may not be invincible—but he’s not beatable by default.

Labour, take heed:
Sometimes, the best way forward is to look within your ranks and ask not “who has the title?” but “who has the trust of the people?”

Otherwise, Bradly might just waltz back into office—unbothered, unbeaten, and unchallenged.

Stop the Madness! Political Oversight Isn’t a Crime — It’s a Duty”

This so-called commentary posted on St Lucia News Online is not only embarrassing in its logic, it's an insult to the intelligence of Saint Lucians. Let’s call this what it is — propaganda masquerading as public concern by so called "Caribbean Writers".

Let’s tear into this foolishness point by point:

1. "Political sabotage"? Really?
Since when is showing up at a construction site — a publicly funded site — considered sabotage? Is the public no longer allowed to question delays, check progress, or challenge the government on transparency? If Allen Chastanet is trespassing, say so and let the law handle it — don’t inflate it into some Mission Impossible movie plot.

2. "Dangerous escalation"? From what — visiting sites? Asking questions?
This article is riddled with fear-mongering, claiming Chastanet is "jeopardizing public safety." How exactly? With a camera crew and some tough questions? The real danger here is the suggestion that political leaders must stay silent or risk being branded enemies of the state.

3. “Strengthen security to stop him”?
This recommendation is laughable. We’re talking about public infrastructure funded by taxpayers. Is the government now building bunkers instead of hospitals? If these projects are so sensitive that an opposition leader showing up is a threat, what are you really hiding?

4. Irony, thy name is this article.
To accuse Chastanet of being desperate because he’s criticizing projects his government started or failed to finish — isn’t that just normal political accountability? Or is the Labour Party now allergic to scrutiny?

5. “This is not about politics.”
Please. This entire piece is dripping with partisanship. It reads more like a press release from a ruling party spin doctor than a credible piece of journalism. The dramatic language, the hollow praise of the government, and the complete absence of counterpoints scream bias.

 Bottom Line:

This isn’t journalism. It’s an attempt to paint legitimate political critique as terrorism. If a sitting opposition leader showing up to inspect government work is now "sabotage," then democracy itself is under threat — not from Chastanet, but from the authors of this nonsense.

Security shouldn’t be used as a shield to block public inquiry. If your projects are sound, let them stand up to scrutiny. If they’re not — well, no amount of fences and cameras will save you from public judgment.

Let’s keep our eyes on real sabotage: corruption, incompetence, and the silencing of dissent.

Let the people decide who’s desperate — we know the smell of fear when we see it in print.

🐾 Justice for Tyson: Who Killed Saint Lucia’s Elite K‑9 Hero?

It’s a question that’s left a nation reeling: Who poisoned Tyson—the elite K‑9 dog from Saint Lucia’s Special Operations Unit?

Tyson wasn’t just a dog. He was a hero in uniform. Donated by the French government, Tyson was trained to sniff out danger—literally. Drugs, firearms, contraband—you name it, Tyson found it. In recent months alone, he had been instrumental in massive drug busts and weapons seizures that shook criminal networks to their core.

And now—he's gone. Poisoned. Silenced. And foul play is suspected.

More Than Just a Tragic Loss

This wasn’t just an unfortunate incident. All signs point to a deliberate act. Tyson’s work hit a nerve, and it seems the criminal underworld retaliated in the most cowardly way—targeting a four-legged officer who couldn’t defend himself against a bowl laced with poison.

The question now isn't just what happened, but who had access… and who had motive.

Where the Investigation Should Begin

To find justice for Tyson, investigators must treat this as they would any other high-profile case involving a fallen officer.

Here’s how this case should be approached:

1. Start with Tyson’s Handler
   Every K‑9 is paired with a trained handler, and their bond is strong. Investigators should interview the handler in detail—not as a suspect, but to piece together Tyson’s last movements and uncover anything unusual.

2. Track the Timeline
   Where was Tyson the day before he fell ill? Who had access to him—at the kennel, in the police vehicle, or during operations? Mapping his timeline is key.

3. Review Surveillance Footage
   Any area where Tyson was housed or deployed should be reviewed for suspicious activity. That includes CCTV from the kennel, training yards, and police stations.

4. Toxicology & Forensic Analysis
   What kind of poison was used? Was it something common or exotic? The answer can narrow down where it came from and who could access it.

5. Interrogate Recent Enemies
   Tyson’s work ruffled feathers. Recent drug busts, especially in Vieux Fort and Castries, might hold clues. Who suffered financial or criminal losses recently due to Tyson’s involvement?

6. Look Inward
   Could this be an inside job? Could someone within the system have leaked deployment information or routines? Investigators must dig deep—however uncomfortable that might be.

A Warning to Criminals

Let this be clear: harming a law enforcement K‑9 is an attack on the justice system itself. It’s not just cruelty—it’s treason against law and order. And it must not go unpunished.

Tyson gave his life in service to this country. The best tribute we can give him now is justice.

Protecting the K‑9 Unit Going Forward

Tyson’s death is a wake-up call. Moving forward:

• K‑9 deployments must be kept confidential.
• Kennels and training grounds need 24/7 surveillance.
• Handlers must be supported and safeguarded.
• Remaining dogs must be given full protection and treated like the officers they are.

Final Words

Tyson didn’t just sniff out contraband—he sniffed out courage. He was fearless, focused, and faithful to the end. And now, we owe him more than tears. We owe him answers.

Out blog family joins the nation in mourning this tragic loss. But more importantly, we join in demanding answers.

Justice for Tyson. No stone should be left unturned.

Time for a Rethink: Should Saint Lucia’s Civil Servants Still Be Silenced by Outdated Staff Orders?

In a modern democracy like ours, it's time we start asking tough questions—especially about rules that feel more colonial than constitutional. One such rule is buried in the Staff Orders governing Saint Lucia’s public sector workers and civil servants. It’s a rule that forbids these individuals from speaking out, engaging in political debate, or even running for office—unless they resign their jobs first.

That’s right. A nurse, teacher, or clerk who dreams of entering politics must walk away from their livelihood just to participate in the democratic process. And if they so much as criticize the government on a public platform or attend a political meeting, they could be penalized or even dismissed.

Let’s unpack that.

What Do the Rules Say?

According to Saint Lucia’s Staff Orders, civil servants are banned from:

Criticizing the government publicly

Publishing or broadcasting anything political or administrative

Participating in any political organization or campaigning

Supporting a political party in any public or obvious way

Running for elected office while still in the public service

If a public servant wants to be a candidate in an election, they must resign—no leave of absence, no middle ground.

Why Were These Rules Created?

The idea was to keep the civil service neutral. Politicians may come and go, but public servants are meant to serve whichever government is in office. That’s a valid principle.

But let’s be real: these rules were designed in a colonial context where “neutrality” often meant silencing dissent. They weren’t built for societies where free speech, civic engagement, and democracy are cornerstones of progress.

Why the Rules Feel Outdated in 2025

In an age where we encourage people to speak out, raise awareness, and be politically conscious, these regulations feel like a muzzle. They treat every act of personal expression—whether it’s liking a political post, writing a blog, or speaking at a community meeting—as a breach of professionalism.

Let’s not forget the human cost. A teacher who wants to serve their community as an MP must walk away from years of hard-earned job security. A health worker with real insight into policy is barred from contributing unless they give up their career.

That’s not democracy. That’s exclusion.

What Needs to Change

We’re not suggesting civil servants become campaigners while on the clock. But a modern update could strike a balance by:

✅ Clearly defining what constitutes political activity

✅ Allowing public servants to express personal opinions (with disclaimers)

✅ Permitting leave of absence instead of forced resignation

✅ Applying stricter neutrality rules only to top-tier civil servants

Other countries have already modernized their codes. In many democracies, civil servants can run for office, provided they step aside temporarily or avoid using their position to gain an advantage. Why not Saint Lucia?

Final Thoughts

Saint Lucia is maturing politically and socially. But we can't keep civil servants trapped under outdated, one-size-fits-all rules designed for a bygone era. It’s time to rewrite the Staff Orders—not to politicize the public service, but to align it with democratic values of freedom, fairness, and full participation.

Silence should never be a condition of service in a free society.

What’s your take? Should public servants be allowed to speak out and run for office without losing their jobs? Let the conversation begin.

A Passport, A Paradise, and A Price” – How Saint Lucia’s CIP May Be Attracting the Wrong Kind of Attention

It was a warm Thursday morning in Castries when Martha, a retired school teacher, opened her newspaper and nearly dropped her cup of cocoa tea. The headline read: “Saint Lucia Named Among 36 Countries That Could Face U.S. Travel Restrictions Over Citizenship-by-Investment.” 

“What in the world now?” she muttered, reaching for her glasses. Her eyes darted across the article. “America? Travel ban? Our passports? Eh eh!”

Down the hill, her nephew Jared, a 28-year-old IT technician with dreams of attending a tech conference in Miami next month, was having a similar moment. His WhatsApp group was buzzing with voice notes. “Boy, if this ban happens, all of us who plan to travel U.S. go have to rethink our plans,” one friend said.

Jared sighed. “But what did we do?”

The Missing Puzzle Piece: Saint Lucia’s CIP

Over the last decade, Saint Lucia has been promoting its Citizenship-by-Investment Program (CIP)—offering second citizenship to foreign nationals in exchange for economic contributions. Sounds like a smart move, right? More funds for development, more jobs, more tourism.

But like all good things, there’s a catch.

It turns out some powerful nations—especially the United States—are not too happy about how certain countries run their CIPs. A leaked memo from the U.S. government listed Saint Lucia among 36 nations whose passport programs may pose “security risks.” In short, they think our passports might be getting into the wrong hands.

So What’s the Problem?

According to the memo, the U.S. is worried that:

• Our CIP may not be doing strong enough background checks.

• Some people get Saint Lucian citizenship without ever setting foot here.

• There’s very little monitoring after the passport is issued.

• And some of those folks may be overstaying their welcome when they travel to America.

In their eyes, this opens the door to fraud, illegal migration, or worse—national security threats.

Brick by Brick – How We Got Here

Many locals remember when our CIP first launched—promising to build roads, hospitals, and even bring in jobs. At first, it seemed like a win. But over the years, the program quietly shifted. The prices dropped. The rules softened. And oversight? Well, that wasn’t always clear.

In fact, Prime Minister Philip J. Pierre recently said that some of the loopholes in the program were not his doing. His administration inherited policies made before his time—like allowing people to qualify for citizenship without making Saint Lucia their home.

Now, we’re paying the price.

What Happens If the Ban Hits?

Back in Castries, Martha called her friend Agnes in New York. “Girl, I don’t know if I’ll make it for Christmas this year. They talking about new visa rules.”

That’s the real danger: If Saint Lucia doesn’t act fast, we could lose our visa-free privileges to countries like the U.S.—affecting:

• Students studying abroad.

• Sick relatives who need medical care overseas.

• Business owners with American partners.

• Regular citizens like Martha, who just want to visit family.

Can We Fix It?

Yes—but it won’t be easy.

The U.S. has given us 60 days to submit a plan. They want to see stronger vetting, better background checks, and international cooperation. The government says they’re working on it. But trust has already been shaken—and fixing that takes more than a press conference.

Saint Lucia needs to tighten its CIP, show transparency, and make it clear that we value our international relationships—and our passport’s reputation—more than quick cash.

Final Word: Protecting Our Name

Jared isn’t canceling his Miami dream just yet. “I’ll wait and see,” he tells his friends. “But this whole thing makes me wonder—how much is our passport really worth, if we’re not protecting it?”

And Martha? She’s back on her veranda, flipping through the paper, hoping the next headline will read: “Saint Lucia Secures Visa-Free Travel—Again.”

Let’s hope her hope isn’t in vain.

Stay informed. Stay engaged. And let’s all keep an eye on the passport that opens doors—for us all.

ROBLOT IS THE KEY TO CHOISEUL/SALTIBUS — AND THE SLP STILL DOESN'T GET IT

Let’s stop pretending. The I5 Roblot polling division is the pulse of Choiseul/Saltibus politics. It’s not just another box on Election Day — it’s the kingmaker. When Labour wins I5, they win Choiseul. When UWP wins I5, their grip tightens. But history has shown one thing loud and clear: ignore Roblot at your peril.

Let’s look at the cold, hard facts.

• In 1997 and 2001, Labour won I5. They also secured the Choiseul/Saltibus seat.
• In 2006 and 2016, the UWP flipped I5 and clinched the seat.
• Yet even in 2011 and 2021, when UWP lost the national election, they still retained Choiseul/Saltibus — but only because Labour failed to dominate Roblot.

So why — why on God’s green earth — would the Saint Lucia Labour Party sit on its laurels in Roblot, the very division that historically determines whether they win or lose this constituency?

One year has passed since the Roblot Community Center was completed under the previous UWP administration. A shiny new building that should be a hub of empowerment, education, and engagement is instead a locked ghost structure. Doors unopened. Lights off. The people shut out.

Why? Because the SLP refuses to cut the ribbon on a building they didn’t build?

That is not leadership. That is pettiness at the expense of progress.

Let’s be very clear: this is not about money. It’s not about technical delays or paperwork. The structure is there. Finished. It’s ready to serve the very people who rallied behind Labour in the last election. But the SLP has chosen pride over people.

It’s disgraceful.

Roblot, your loyalty is being taken for granted. You are the very reason this government holds the seat — and you’re being rewarded with locked doors and empty promises.

What does that say about the SLP’s commitment to Choiseul/Saltibus?

They know the numbers. They know the math. You win I5, you win Choiseul. But instead of solidifying that base, they’re testing your patience and insulting your intelligence. They think you'll keep showing up for them, even as they fail to show up for you.

Roblot deserves better. Choiseul deserves better.

SLP, here’s your wake-up call: you don’t own this seat — you rent it from the people, and rent is due. If you keep ignoring Roblot, you will lose the very seat you claim to have secured. Because Roblot has the power — and history proves it.

Open the center. Serve the people. Or pack your bags next election.

The Roblot Prophecy: How One Tiny Booth Keeps Deciding the Choiseul/Saltibus Election

In the quiet community of Debreuil stands a government building—the Roblot Combined School. Most days, it echoes with the chatter of children and the clatter of chalk. But every five years, this Hess-built schoolhouse transforms into something much more powerful: the most influential polling station in Choiseul/Saltibus.

Locals call it “I5.” Politicians call it ground zero.

A Pattern Too Precise to Ignore

The year was 1997. The nation was painted red—Labour red. Across Saint Lucia, the Saint Lucia Labour Party (SLP) swept into power in a historic landslide. But in Choiseul/Saltibus, something odd happened: the numbers in Roblot quietly mirrored the eventual victor. It happened again in 2001. Again in 2006. And every time since.

When United Workers Party (UWP) took the seat in 2016 with Bradley Felix, Roblot had already told us it would happen. In 2021, despite a national SLP wave, Felix held on—barely. But guess what? Roblot again gave him a clear lead, handing UWP a margin of more than 18 percentage points. The rest of the constituency followed just close enough to match the tone Roblot had already set.

It was no longer coincidence. It was a pattern.

The “I5 Effect”

Election strategists began to whisper about it during campaign season:

“If you win Roblot, you win the seat.”

But why? What made this small booth of just a few hundred voters so powerful?

Some say it’s because Roblot represents a perfect cross-section of the constituency—teachers, farmers, tradesmen, retirees, and young dreamers. Others believe it’s the passion of the community—voters here care. They show up. And their concerns—roads, jobs, youth programs—reflect the beating heart of Choiseul/Saltibus.

In fact, during one campaign, Roblot residents staged a spontaneous mini-protest about a neglected road. By sundown, not only was the road issue trending locally, but every candidate was suddenly promising solutions on national radio.

Why Candidates Must Win Roblot—or Die Trying

What makes Roblot so vital?

• Vote Cushion: In 2021, Felix’s total margin of victory was 385 votes. Roblot alone gave him over 120 of those. Without it? He’d have lost.
• Tone Setter: The booth reports early. When Roblot swings UWP or SLP, it energizes the entire base. It can demoralize one side before all boxes are counted.
• Media Bait: Local media often frames the election night story around Roblot’s results. It’s a perception game—and perception can sway real votes.

The Drama Returns in 2026

Now, as whispers of new candidates begin to stir in the constituency, campaigners are already marking maps. And at the center of every plan is one big circle around I5 – Roblot Combined School.

They’ll be walking door to door, listening to uncles on porches, nodding at grannies in roadside shops, and promising better days—because they know the truth.

Roblot decides.

Final thought: If elections are battles, then Roblot is the hill everyone wants to hold. And in Choiseul/Saltibus, history has taught us one thing: he who wins Roblot, wins the war.

🛑 Darrion’s Crossroads: The Political Perils of Switching Sides

The political heat in Choiseul/Saltibus just got turned way up! 🔥 And no, it’s not another jazz event at La Fargue. It’s Darrion Louis, the once-loyal Bradley Felix associate, now gunning for the SLP ticket. Yes—you read that right! The attache has detached, and he’s marching to a whole new rhythm. But before the red shirts start cheering and the yellow flags start flying in protest, let’s ask the burning question:

Is Darrion Louis ready for the political risks of switching sides?

1. Betrayal or Bravery?

For die-hard UWP supporters, Darrion’s move will feel like being ghosted after years of loyalty. The man who was once Bradley’s right-hand is now aiming to unseat the very party he served. That’s bold. But bold can also backfire. Critics will call it betrayal. Supporters? Maybe they’ll call it bravery. Either way, it’s a PR tightrope Darrion must walk with care.

2. "New SLP Face" or Just Another Opportunist?

Let’s be honest—SLP has a pool of hopefuls ready to splash into the Choiseul/Saltibus seat. KC, Pauline, Mervin—all strong contenders with deep roots and loyal camps. So where does Darrion fit in? His sudden alignment with Labour raises eyebrows. Is he just trying to hitch a ride on a winning train? Or is he genuinely transformed?

Some in the party faithful may side-eye his intentions. And in politics, optics matter more than intentions.

3. The Narrative War Has Begun

You can bet your last coal pot that the UWP will come swinging. Expect the headlines:

> “From Team Felix to Turncoat?”

“Can Choiseul Trust Darrion Louis?”

They’ll paint him as a traitor. A power-hungry climber. But if Darrion is sharp—and he is—he’ll flip the script:

> “I didn’t leave the UWP. The UWP left Choiseul.”

His challenge? Control the narrative or be consumed by it.

4. Is the SLP Ready for Him?

It’s one thing to want the SLP seat. It’s another to earn it. Can Darrion outshine the others in the room without dimming their light? That’s the real test. SLP doesn’t just want energy—it wants loyalty, consistency, and political maturity.

Will party insiders rally behind him? Or will they see him as a red flag in a red shirt?

5. What If He’s Not Picked?

Let’s not forget: Darrion first considered running as an independent. If the SLP nod doesn’t come his way, will he take his campaign solo? That’s risky business. Going rogue could fracture the vote, split the party’s base, and hand Choiseul/Saltibus back to the UWP on a silver platter.

The ball is in SLP’s court. But if they fumble, and Darrion runs solo, we might witness a three-way political tug-of-war that leaves voters exhausted and unrepresented.

The Big Question

So… is Darrion’s leap from blue to red a sign of evolution—or political desperation? One thing’s for sure: he’s sparked a fire in Choiseul’s political scene. Whether it burns bright or burns out depends on how he navigates the storm of scrutiny, party politics, and voter expectations ahead.

But hey, Choiseul wanted change. This might just be it—wrapped in ambition, controversy, and one very big gamble.

Let the political chess game begin. ♟️

🔥From Bradley's Shadow to the SLP Spotlight: Is Darrion Louis the Political Disruptor Choiseul Needs?🔥

The winds of political change are blowing through Choiseul/Saltibus—and not just with a gentle breeze, but with the gust of a fiery new contender who has dared to step out from behind the curtain. Once the trusted "attache" of Bradley Felix, Darrion Louis is now stepping boldly into the political limelight—and folks, he’s not playing small.

The once-fiery momentum behind the Bradley Felix brand seems to have fizzled out. In Darrion’s own words, it’s like flogging a dead horse. But don’t misunderstand him—he’s not here to throw stones. He’s here to light a fresh flame.

"Choiseul is not lacking in resources—it’s only been lacking in unified direction."

That line hits home.

Darrion, youthful yet seasoned, was once a loyal soldier in the UWP trenches. But disillusionment with the current leadership—particularly what he sees as a disappointing lack of drive from the incumbent and a refusal to challenge a weakened opposition leader—has stirred a different fire in him.

Initially, he contemplated running as an independent. But after thoughtful consultations with constituents and Labour Party allies, and with the sobering reality of Saint Lucia’s political playing field, he made the strategic decision to throw his hat into the SLP ring.

And now? The battle for the SLP candidacy in Choiseul/Saltibus is heating up like a Saturday bouyon pot! With a pool that includes KC, Mervin, Pauline, and Darrion, it’s clear that the race is no walkover.

But what makes Darrion stand out?

Let’s break down the bold vision he shared in a one-on-one sit-down:

🏟 1. A Mini Stadium for Big Dreams

La Fargue has proven it can host big events—from SPL matches to Jazz vibes. Now, Darrion wants to take it further with a community-driven mini stadium. A hub for sports, concerts, and cultural unity? Yes, please!

🧳 2. A Tourism Renaissance with a Choiseul Stamp

From Piaye waterfalls to the River Dorée ruins, Choiseul is bursting with untapped gems. Darrion’s vision includes structured tours, global-ready craft branding, and entrepreneurial support. Think: a tourism product so strong, even Soufrière might feel the heat.

🏛 3. A Non-Partisan Choiseul Development Foundation

Imagine a community-led foundation focused on real progress, not party colour. Reviving Queen Shows, Carnival, and driving development with heart and transparency—Darrion sees this as the glue that binds dreams with action.

🚒 4. Services that Actually Serve

Choiseul still lacks a fire station? That’s a life-threatening oversight. Darrion’s plan includes essential upgrades to health care, better transportation for our elderly, and infrastructure that respects the dignity of every citizen.

It’s not just about replacing a rep—it’s about igniting a new era of leadership built on vision, courage, and connection to the people.

Now, all eyes are on the Saint Lucia Labour Party. Will they recognize the spark in Darrion Louis? Will they bet on youthful dynamism over traditional structures?

One thing is for sure—Choiseul is moving. And whether you like him or not, Darrion is no longer in the background. He's writing his own political script, and it might just be the plot twist Choiseul didn't see coming.

So, Choiseul—will you go with the flow, or light it up with new fire? 🔥

🎶 District 7, Where’s the Calypso Spirit? Saltibus Combined Leads the Way! 🎶

Once again, Saltibus Combined School has proven that talent, passion, and preparation go a long way in keeping Saint Lucian culture alive. At the recently held National Schools Junior Calypso Competition, Ti Moto proudly represented Saltibus with the original song “Mr. CPEA,” and secured an impressive third place finish.

Check out this proud moment as Ti Moto receives his trophy, standing tall beside his presenters after delivering a performance that clearly struck a chord with the judges and audience alike.

While we celebrate this well-deserved recognition, we must also pause and reflect. Where were the other District 7 schools? Last year, Choiseul was buzzing with calypso energy—multiple schools participated, voices rose in rhythm and rhyme, and students felt the beat of our national art form. But this year, the silence was deafening.

Only one school from our district showed up and showed out.

And to the team at Saltibus Combined—we salute you. Your commitment to cultural development is evident. Your presence at this event shows what’s possible when a school community chooses to invest in its students’ creativity. Congratulations to your staff and music coordinator for nurturing young talent and representing our district with pride.

But here's the hard truth: one school's participation is not enough.

Where were the others? Where are the school principals? The music teachers? The programs that once made District 7 a lively hub for youth calypso?

The National Schools Junior Calypso Competition is more than just a show. It’s a national initiative to safeguard Saint Lucia’s musical identity and cultivate the next generation of calypsonians. It's part of the broader Lucian Carnival calendar, a space for our youth to express themselves and build confidence through performance.

Yet, somewhere along the way, we seem to have lost momentum.

It's time for some honest soul-searching.
👉 Are we giving our music programs the resources they need?
👉 Are teachers being supported to scout and train talent?
👉 Do we view calypso as an "extra," or as the powerful cultural tool that it is?

The students are ready. The talent is there. What’s missing is the institutional will.

Let’s not allow this decline in participation to become the new norm. Let’s recommit to giving our children the chance to shine, just like Ti Moto did today.

If Saltibus Combined School can do it, so can every other school in District 7. Let’s raise our voices, revive the rhythm, and ensure that next year, our district is not only heard—but felt—in every calypso verse.

To the principals, teachers, and education leaders in District 7: Calypso needs you. Our children need you. The culture needs you. Let’s get back on beat.

Ermay vs. Prospere: The Fight That Could Cost Labour the Seat

In the previous blog post we mentioned KC, whom a Pauline surrogate coined as a rum...lol. Bearing in mind the time constraints required for campaigning "Choiseul on the Move" believes that the time period until General Elections may be too short for KC to make a meaninful impact. However we see a possible runoff in the making.

The political waters in Choiseul/Saltibus are starting to churn again, and this time, it’s not just about who wins—but who runs. With incumbent Bradley Felix (UWP) holding on to the seat after a convincing win in 2021, the Saint Lucia Labour Party (SLP) now faces a critical internal decision: Should they stick with Dr. Pauline Antoine-Prospere, or pass the torch to Mervin Ermay?

This isn’t just a personality contest—it’s a strategic decision that could determine whether Labour finally reclaims one of its former strongholds or cedes it again to the United Workers Party.

🏞️ The Landscape of Choiseul/Saltibus

Let’s be real—Choiseul/Saltibus is not an easy constituency to win. It’s sprawling, topographically challenging, and deeply divided in its political loyalties. From Saltibus to Morne Sion, to La Fargue, Mongouge and the heart of Choiseul Village, connecting with voters here requires more than just policy—it takes presence, consistency, and trust.

📉 2021 Recap: Pauline vs. Bradley

In the 2021 general elections, Dr. Pauline Antoine-Prospere ran under the Labour banner but was defeated by Bradley Felix by over 400 votes. This wasn’t a close squeaker—it was a clear message. While the SLP was riding a national wave, Bradley held his ground in Choiseul, showing that his local support base runs deep and loyal.

Dr. Prospere, though educated and composed, struggled to ignite enthusiasm in key areas like Choiseul Village and La Fargue, and despite good intentions and a calm presence, voters may have found her too soft-spoken or distant for the rough-and-tumble of constituency politics.

🔥 Enter Mervin Ermay: The Challenger Within

Now, there’s a new name making the rounds—Mervin Ermay, a long-time Labour loyalist known for his boots-on-the-ground approach and strong grassroots appeal. He’s been building quiet momentum in Choiseul, especially among the youth and working class. People say he’s accessible, passionate, and ready for the fight.

Supporters believe Ermay is the fresh energy SLP needs—someone who can go toe-to-toe with Bradley Felix on the ground, in the communites, and in the hearts of undecided voters.

🧠 Strategy Check: Who Can Beat Bradley?

That’s the question SLP strategists must be asking behind closed doors.

Candidate 2021 Result       Visibility            Electability vs. Felix Constituency Appeal

Pauline Antoine-Prospere Lost by 400+ votes Moderate Low to moderate Strong in Saltibus/Mongouge

Mervin Ermay Not yet tested High and growing Moderate to high Building across Choiseul, especially among youth

While Dr. Prospere has experience and name recognition, it’s hard to ignore the fact that she had her shot and couldn’t close the gap. In contrast, Ermay brings a fighting spirit and a connection with everyday people that may just be the missing ingredient Labour needs to break through.

🗳️ The Road Ahead

With general elections possibly on the horizon within the next 13 or less months, time is ticking. If the SLP wants to flip Choiseul/Saltibus, they’ll need to make their selection early, unify behind the candidate, and hit the ground running—literally.

If Labour wants a safe, familiar face, they’ll go with Dr. Prospere again.

But if they want to shake up the race and challenge Bradley Felix with fresh political energy, the smart money may be on Mervin Ermay.

💬 Final Thought

The people of Choiseul/Saltibus deserve a candidate who shows up, listens, and works—not just during elections, but all year round. Whether that person is Pauline or Ermay, the Labour Party cannot afford to gamble. They must choose the one who gives them the best shot at victory—not just on paper, but on the ground.

And for now, all eyes are on that red ticket.

🔥 Is Choiseul Still Labour Country? Not If Pauline or Mervin Runs!

As Saint Lucia approaches its constitutionally due general elections in 2026, the Choiseul/Saltibus constituency is poised for a significant political contest. The Saint Lucia Labour Party (SLP) is considering two potential candidates: Dr. Pauline Antoine-Prospere and Mervin Ermay. Both aim to challenge the incumbent, Bradley Felix of the United Workers Party (UWP), who has held the seat since 2016

🧑‍⚕️ Pauline Antoine-Prospere: The Educator Turned Politician

Dr. Pauline Antoine-Prospere, an educator by profession, was the SLP's candidate in the 2021 general elections. She secured 46.3% of the vote but was defeated by Felix, who garnered 53.5% . Her candidacy was marked by internal party disputes, notably with Dr. Alphonsus St. Rose, who had significant grassroots support. Despite a petition with 700 signatures favoring St. Rose, the SLP endorsed Antoine-Prospere, leading to tensions within the party 

Critics argue that Antoine-Prospere's leadership style contributed to her electoral loss, citing poor rapport with team members and concerns over her management of community projects. Her support base has reportedly diminished since 2021, raising questions about her viability as a candidate in the upcoming elections.

🧑‍💼 Mervin Ermay: The Controversial Contender

Mervin Ermay, another potential SLP candidate, is not without controversy. He is accused of supporting Dr. St. Rose during the 2021 internal party conflict, which some believe undermined Antoine-Prospere's campaign. Ermay has yet to establish a strong personal base within the constituency, and areas like the Mongouge polling division, once considered SLP strongholds, have shown waning support.

🧑‍💼 Bradley Felix: The Incumbent's Stronghold

Bradley Felix has been the Member of Parliament for Choiseul/Saltibus since 2016. Despite the SLP's landslide victory in 2021, Felix retained his seat, making him one of only two UWP members to do so . His continued presence in the constituency, including involvement in community initiatives like road repairs , has bolstered his reputation among constituents.

🔮 The Road Ahead: SLP's Strategic Decisions

Given the internal challenges and the strength of the incumbent, the SLP faces a critical decision in selecting a candidate capable of uniting the party and appealing to the electorate. Some suggest that a new figure, initials "KC," who possesses charisma and a solid base to start with, could be the party's best hope against Felix.

In conclusion, unless the SLP addresses its internal divisions and presents a candidate who can galvanize support across the constituency, Bradley Felix appears well-positioned to retain his seat in the upcoming elections.

Eulogy for Dr. Kenny D. Anthony: A Legacy of Service, Vision, and Integrity

Today, we honor Dr. Kenny Davis Anthony, a titan of Saint Lucian politics, whose departure from public life marks the end of an era defined by transformative leadership, intellectual rigor, and unwavering dedication to his nation. Over three decades, Dr. Anthony’s contributions reshaped Saint Lucia’s social, economic, and political landscape, leaving an indelible imprint on the Caribbean region.  

A Statesman’s Journey 

Born in Laborie in 1951, Dr. Anthony rose from humble beginnings to become one of Saint Lucia’s most revered leaders. A scholar with two first-class honors degrees and a PhD—earned without an oral examination, a testament to his academic brilliance—he merged intellectual prowess with grassroots empathy . His political career began in education and culture, later expanding to roles as Minister of Education, Prime Minister (1997–2006, 2011–2016), and Leader of the Opposition .  

Architect of Progress 

Dr. Anthony’s tenure as Prime Minister was marked by bold reforms and inclusive policies:  

1. Economic Revitalization: Under his leadership, Saint Lucia saw record GDP growth, peaking at 5.4% in 2005, driven by investments in tourism, manufacturing, and infrastructure like the Beausejour Cricket Ground and National Stadium, which positioned the island as a hub for sports tourism .  

2. Social Equity: He championed universal secondary education, free healthcare for chronic illnesses, and the Poverty Reduction Fund (PRF), lifting countless citizens from deprivation. His PROUD land ownership initiative empowered communities like Cantonement and Bruceville, a cause he passionately urged successors to continue .  

3. Regional Influence: A stalwart of Caribbean integration, he critiqued CARICOM’s challenges while advocating for collective resilience, emphasizing that regional unity must evolve to meet modern demands . 

A Leader of Principle  

Dr. Anthony’s legacy transcends policy. He embodied civility in politics, fostering friendships even with former opponents and rejecting divisiveness. “Representation is not just about monuments… It’s about compassion, mercy, and respect,” he declared, urging constituents to evaluate leaders by their character, not rhetoric . His decision to step aside from the Cabinet in 2021, allowing Prime Minister Philip J. Pierre to govern “freely and unhindered,” exemplified his commitment to nurturing new leadership .  

The Man Behind the Title

In his final address, Dr. Anthony eschewed requests for monuments, asking instead to be remembered as “a good and decent human being” guided by love, humility, and integrity . His reflection on 28 years representing Vieux Fort South revealed a leader deeply connected to his people—one who found solace in their loyalty even during political setbacks .  

A Legacy Eternal

As Dr. Anthony retires, his words resonate: “There is honor in politics.” His career disproved cynicism, proving that principled leadership can uplift nations. From deregulating telecommunications to advocating for regional stability, his work laid foundations for a brighter future.  

Final Farewell  

To Dr. Kenny Anthony: Scholar, visionary, servant—your legacy is etched in the roads built, the lands returned, the classrooms filled, and the hearts you touched. May your retirement be as dignified as your service, and may Saint Lucia forever strive to honor your example.  

“If you can fill the unforgiving minute / With sixty seconds’ worth of distance run…” . You did, Sir. Yours is the Earth, and everything in it.  

Inspired by his own words and deeds, we bid farewell to a true Caribbean luminary.

Preserving Heritage While Pursuing Progress: In Support of Laura Jn Pierre-Noel's Vision

Laura Jn Pierre-Noel’s stirring appeal on her facebook page for thoughtful development in Castries couldn’t come at a more critical time. Her message—rooted in reason, love for community, and a deep understanding of our cultural DNA—deserves not only applause, but action.

Saint Lucians everywhere, particularly in historic districts like Laborie and Castries, are right to question the cost of progress when it threatens to bulldoze the very soul of our identity. Laura’s call for a balanced approach to justice—one that honors our past while planning for our future—is both timely and necessary. She reminds us that heritage is not a roadblock to development, but rather the compass by which we should steer it.

The Halls of Justice is a noble concept, but if its foundation is laid on the grave of our cultural landmarks—without proper consultation, impact assessment, or genuine community input—then it is justice built on injustice. We echo Laura’s call for transparency and civic engagement. It is not enough for development to be efficient; it must be meaningful, inclusive, and respectful.

Castries is not just a place—it is a narrative. From the steps of the Minor Basilica to the benches of Derek Walcott Square, every stone and tree carries a memory, a legacy, and a lesson. We must not allow ill-placed concrete to silence our history. We must demand that alternative sites be carefully considered, that every voice be heard, and that heritage impact assessments become standard, not optional.

Laura Jn Pierre-Noel stands not just as a candidate, but as a guardian of Saint Lucian identity. Her advocacy is a reminder that leadership means standing firm for the people, for their stories, and for the sacred spaces that shaped them. As the UWP candidate for Laborie, she has shown that she’s not afraid to speak truth to power or fight for justice that uplifts—not erases—our heritage.

In this election and beyond, let us champion leaders who not only build for today but preserve the richness of yesterday. Saint Lucia deserves nothing less.

Why the SLP Should Call Elections Now—Not in 2026

In politics, timing is everything. And for the Saint Lucia Labour Party (SLP), the clock may be ticking louder than they realize. While the next general election isn’t constitutionally due until 2026, the smart move—the strategic move—is to go to the polls early.

Here’s why.

1. The Tariff Time Bomb

Saint Lucia’s economy doesn’t operate in a bubble. Global currents—especially U.S. trade and tariff policies—can create ripples that become tidal waves for small island states like ours. With America’s shifting trade posture and unpredictable economic cycles, there’s a real risk that by 2026, external shocks could hit our already vulnerable economy hard.

If inflation spikes, food and fuel prices soar, or regional trade falters, the fallout could stain the SLP’s record, whether fair or not. Better to face voters now, while the economic outlook is still relatively stable and manageable.

2. A Window on Unemployment

Let’s give credit where it’s due—the SLP has made progress in tackling unemployment, especially among youth. But let’s be real: employment gains take time to solidify, and perception often lags behind reality. If the party waits until 2026 and job creation stalls or becomes overshadowed by other issues, all that progress could be lost in the noise.

Striking while there’s still momentum gives the SLP a chance to own the narrative: “We promised jobs—and we delivered.”

3. The Chaos Card: Disasters, Scandals, and the Unknown

Politics is always one scandal or storm away from collapse. Natural disasters, global health crises, or even internal political missteps can change everything overnight. Waiting two more years increases the odds of something going wrong. And when chaos strikes, voters don’t always judge calmly—they judge whoever’s in charge.

An early election lets the SLP lead from a position of strength before the chaos card is drawn.

4. Opposition Rebuilding? Not Yet.

The opposition is still trying to find its footing. The United Workers Party (UWP) remains fragmented, with no clear leader who can rival Philip J. Pierre’s steady image. But give them another year or two, and they might just surprise everyone with a rejuvenated team and a sharper message.

Strike while the opposition is still sharpening their pencils—not when they’ve finished writing their comeback script.

5. Public Sentiment Is a Moving Target

Right now, the mood on the ground is mixed but not hostile. The SLP still has political capital—but it’s not infinite. Voter fatigue, rising expectations, and social media firestorms can erode goodwill quickly. The sooner the party gives the people a chance to renew their mandate, the more control they have over the conversation.

The Bottom Line: It’s About Control

Calling elections early isn’t an act of fear—it’s an act of foresight. It gives the SLP a chance to define the terms of the battle, energize its base, and remind Saint Lucians of why they entrusted this government with power in the first place.

Waiting until 2026 is a gamble. Acting now? That’s smart politics.