Before You Vote: The Qualities Every Electorate Must Look For in a Candidate

As the campaign season heats up and political promises fill the air, it’s easy to get swept away by charisma, color, and catchy slogans. But elections aren’t beauty contests or popularity shows—they’re about leadership, integrity, and the future of our communities.

Before casting that all-important vote, the electorate must take a hard look at who they’re voting for and what they truly stand for. Here are the essential qualities and traits every voter should look for in a candidate:

1. Integrity Above All

A candidate’s integrity is the foundation of trust. Look for someone who has a proven record of honesty and transparency, both in public and private life.

If a candidate twists facts, dodges questions, or changes stories to suit the moment, that’s a red flag. Leadership without integrity is leadership headed for corruption.

2. Vision and Competence

A good leader doesn’t just criticize what’s wrong—they clearly outline how to make things right.

The electorate must ask: Does this candidate have a realistic plan? Can they manage resources wisely? Do they understand the needs of the people they wish to serve?

A vision without competence is just talk. Competence without vision is chaos.

3. Commitment to Service, Not Self

Public service is exactly that—service. A candidate must show genuine concern for people, not personal gain.

Watch how they treat ordinary citizens when cameras aren’t rolling. Do they listen? Do they follow up?

A self-serving politician will always find excuses; a servant-leader will always find solutions.

4. Courage and Accountability

It takes courage to speak truth to power, to stand up for what’s right even when it’s unpopular.

A true leader doesn’t blame others or hide behind committees—they take responsibility.

Voters should ask: When faced with tough decisions, will this person do what’s right or what’s convenient?

5. Emotional Intelligence

Leadership isn’t just about intelligence—it’s about empathy.

The best candidates are those who understand people’s struggles, communicate respectfully, and stay calm under pressure.

A candidate who listens more than they speak and values dialogue over division will always make better decisions.

6. Track Record and Community Connection

Promises are easy to make, but past actions speak louder than words.

What has the candidate done for the community before election time? Have they shown up only when votes are needed?

A person who has consistently contributed to community growth—without political reward—is someone worth trusting with greater responsibility.

7. Respect for Law and Institutions

Every democracy thrives when its leaders respect the rule of law, independent institutions, and due process.

Beware of candidates who think they’re above the system or use power to intimidate or silence others.

A good leader strengthens institutions—not weakens them.

In Closing: Choose Wisely

Elections decide the direction of a nation. The next time a candidate comes knocking, don’t just listen to what they say—watch what they’ve done, and how they live.

Vote not for the loudest voice, but for the most consistent one.

Vote for character, not color.

Vote for vision, not vanity.

Vote for service, not slogans.

The future of your community depends on it

A Batting Rethink Is Overdue for the West Indies Team

For decades, the name West Indies cricket carried an aura of fear, respect, and admiration. Bowlers like Holding, Ambrose, and Walsh brought thunder, but the brilliance of batsmen like Viv Richards, Brian Lara, and Shivnarine Chanderpaul defined the team’s soul. Today, that sparkle has dimmed — and it’s becoming painfully clear: a serious rethink of our batting approach is long overdue.

The Problem Isn’t Just Technique — It’s Mindset

Modern cricket demands adaptability, patience, and smart shot selection. Too often, West Indies batters collapse in clusters, playing rash strokes at critical junctures. The power-hitting culture, while exciting in T20s, has seeped into Test and ODI formats where restraint and situational awareness matter most. Cricket isn’t just about sixes — it’s about surviving sessions, building partnerships, and showing discipline.

The truth is, the regional circuit no longer molds players for the long game. Young talents are being fast-tracked through franchise leagues, where entertainment trumps endurance. As a result, many promising batsmen arrive on the international stage without the foundation or patience to construct a big innings.

Where the System Is Failing

The domestic setup has struggled to produce batters who can consistently perform under pressure. Weak pitches, limited exposure to quality bowling, and inconsistent coaching structures all contribute to this. The regional tournaments must become a true breeding ground — not just a formality.

Investment in mental conditioning, data analysis, and technical mentorship must become non-negotiable. Why can’t each territory have a batting academy led by a former great? Imagine a structure where players are groomed by legends like Lara or Sarwan, learning to build innings the Caribbean way — with flair and fight.

A Call for Leadership and Vision

The West Indies Cricket Board and coaching staff must stop papering over cracks. Changing captains or shuffling the order won’t fix the deeper issues. The team needs a clear batting philosophy — one that values temperament as much as talent.

Players must be taught that every run matters. Whether it’s grinding in a Test match or pacing an ODI chase, the approach must be thoughtful, not impulsive. Leadership must inspire pride in wearing maroon — not just participation in another tournament.

The Way Forward

A batting rethink means more than technical tweaks. It’s a cultural shift — from carefree hitting to calculated aggression. The Caribbean still breeds natural talent, but talent without structure leads to waste.

If the West Indies want to reclaim their cricketing glory, they must invest in the art of batting again. Discipline must become fashionable, patience must become powerful, and pride must return to the crease.

The world still remembers the roar of the maroon. It’s time our batsmen learned to make it echo again — through courage, craft, and consistency.

One Rule for All: A Call for Fairness at the Choiseul Parish Cemetery

For decades, the Choiseul parish cemetery has stood as sacred ground — a place where families lay their loved ones to rest with dignity, reverence, and spiritual closure. But today, that sense of sacred fairness is under serious threat. What should be a space governed by order, compassion, and transparency has instead fallen into confusion, inconsistency, and troubling signs of favoritism.

The issue centers on the allocation of tomb spaces — a matter the Church itself previously admitted had become unmanageable due to years of poor planning. Tombs were placed haphazardly, permissions were issued spontaneously, and the cemetery evolved without a proper long-term plan. As a result, the parish administration later announced that no new tombs would be permitted moving forward. A difficult but understandable decision… if it were applied fairly.

“A cemetery is sacred ground — not a playground for favoritism.

 One rule, one standard, one people.”

But this is where the problem lies.

Despite the official policy, multiple families have been flatly denied permission to build tombs for their recently departed loved ones — while, at the very same time, other individuals are quietly being granted approval. These permissions are not publicly announced, not explained, and not justified. Yet they continue.

This selective treatment is not only unfair — it is deeply disrespectful to the grieving families who have had to navigate their loss without clarity, compassion, or consistency.

No parish should ever operate in secrecy or favoritism, especially when the matter involves the final resting place of its own people.

What’s Good for One Should Be Good for All

The Choiseul community is not asking for special treatment. Parishioners are not demanding privileges. All they are asking for is fairness — the same standard applied across the board without exception, preference, politics, or quiet backdoor decisions.

If the Church’s position is that the cemetery is full, then it must be full for everyone — not full for some and open for others.

If new tombs cannot be constructed, then no one should be allowed to build.

And if there is still space — or if certain plots can still be approved — then all parishioners must have equal access to that opportunity.

Anything less is a betrayal of trust.

A Parish Must Reflect Its People

Parishioners are the heart of the Church. They are the ones who support the parish, attend Mass, volunteer, tithe, maintain traditions, and sustain church life from generation to generation. To see their families treated unfairly in their hour of mourning is not only hurtful — it is unacceptable.

We say this with respect, but with unwavering clarity:
the administration of the Choiseul parish must correct this imbalance immediately.

• Either reinstate a fair, transparent approval process for all parishioners…

• Or stop granting permissions altogether, without exceptions, without favorites, without secrecy.

The community deserves honesty and consistency. Families deserve the right to bury their loved ones without politics or favoritism. And the Church, above all, must uphold the principles it teaches — justice, compassion, equality, and truth.

A Final Word to the Parish Administration

This message is not written out of anger, but out of commitment to fairness and love for the community. People simply want what is right: one rule for everyone. If the cemetery is closed, let it be closed for all. If space exists, let the entire parish have equal access.

Because what is good for the geese must also be good for the gander.

The people are watching.
And they are asking, respectfully but firmly, for the Choiseul parish to do the right thing.

“Justice is not justice when it applies to some and not to all. The parish must rise to the standard it preaches.”

DAY 2: The Economic Scorecard — Growth or Recovery?

From Promises to Reality — A Citizen’s Look at the SLP Record

Published on: November 12, 2025
By: Choiseul on the Move Editorial Team

The Numbers That Tell a Story

The Saint Lucia Labour Party’s (SLP) From Promises to Reality report opens with an impressive headline:

“Saint Lucia’s economy is the largest in the Eastern Caribbean Currency Union, representing over one-quarter of total GDP.”

It proudly cites three consecutive years of positive primary balances, a reduction of outstanding payables from $130 million to $30 million, and steady economic growth between 3.9% and 4.9% in 2023–2024.

At first glance, it’s a compelling narrative — an image of strong fiscal discipline and stability under Prime Minister Philip J. Pierre. But dig a little deeper, and the question emerges: Is this true growth, or simply recovery from crisis?

Growth vs. Recovery: Understanding the Context

When the administration took office in July 2021, the economy was in freefall — a staggering 22.9% decline in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The following years saw inevitable rebound growth across the region, not just in Saint Lucia.

So while 2022 and 2023 recorded double-digit expansions, economists warn that such numbers largely represent a “bounce back effect” — a recovery of what was lost, rather than new growth.

In reality, Saint Lucia’s GDP in constant terms is only now returning to pre-pandemic levels. Tourism, construction, and public expenditure have been the main engines, but private sector investment remains sluggish and inflation continues to erode disposable income.

Debt Management and Fiscal Balances

The manifesto report highlights a $95 million primary balance surplus in FY 2023/24, compared to a –$117 million deficit in 2021/22. This is indeed a major fiscal turnaround, aided by the removal of arrears, increased revenue collection, and a sharp reduction in capital expenditure delays.

However, much of this success stems from record remittances and inflation-driven VAT revenue, not necessarily expanded production or exports. Meanwhile, the public debt remains around $4 billion, hovering near 80% of GDP — still above regional sustainability thresholds.

The government deserves credit for discipline, but the challenge ahead is growth-led balance, not austerity-led balance.

Employment and Productivity

The report celebrates record employment of 97,000 people and an 11% unemployment rate in early 2024, the lowest on record. Yet, many of these jobs fall under short-term contracts, STEP projects, or public service absorption, not private enterprise expansion.

Saint Lucia’s productivity index has not seen significant improvement, and youth unemployment—though reduced—remains double the national average. Without productivity growth, wage increases and cost-of-living pressures could quickly cancel out these statistical wins.

Where the Economy Feels It Most

Ask the ordinary Saint Lucian: does this feel like a thriving economy?
The answers are mixed. Prices for fuel, groceries, and basic goods remain high; electricity and transportation eat into wages; and the much-touted tax relief barely offsets the new 2.5% Health and Security Levy.

In other words, macroeconomic success hasn’t yet translated into microeconomic relief.

Our Takeaway

The Pierre administration deserves recognition for stabilizing finances and restoring investor confidence. But it’s misleading to label this a “thriving economy.”

What we’re seeing is recovery, not revolution — the regaining of balance after crisis, not the leap toward transformation promised in 2021.

Tomorrow on Day 3

We dive into the heart of every kitchen-table conversation — Cost of Living & Tax Relief: VAT Removed, but Prices Rising?

Can tax cuts truly outweigh rising inflation? And is the average Saint Lucian really keeping more money in their pocket? Stay tuned.

Two Visions, One Constituency: Bradley vs Kiffo and the Future of Choiseul/Saltibus

As election fever slowly builds across the island, the people of Choiseul/Saltibus find themselves at the heart of a fascinating political crossroads. On one side stands Bradley Felix, the seasoned parliamentarian with a track record of calm leadership and measured governance. On the other, Keithson “Kiffo” Charles, the newcomer with a bold message of renewal and a promise to end what he calls “a season of silence.”

Both men present distinct visions for the constituency — one grounded in continuity, the other in change. But what do their messages really say about the kind of leadership each offers?

🟨 Bradley Felix: Steady Hands, Proven Path

Felix’s message is simple: results over rhetoric. His vision emphasizes continuity, inclusiveness, and a quiet strength born of experience. In his recent interview with Lisa Joseph, he reminded voters of what was achieved between 2016 and 2021, urging them to “sift through the fluff and the bluff” and focus on tangible results.

He positions himself as:

• A non-discriminatory representative who serves all constituents, regardless of political affiliation.

• A tested leader who knows how to navigate the system to bring development to Choiseul.

• A man focused on family values and youth, believing progress must be sustainable and rooted in community strength.

• Someone who wants to keep Choiseul high on the national agenda, ensuring continued investment and attention.

Felix’s tone reflects confidence, stability, and pride — a belief that leadership should be about quiet delivery rather than noisy confrontation.

🟥 Keithson “Kiffo” Charles: The Sound of Renewal

In contrast, Kiffo’s maiden speech was fiery, passionate, and people-driven. He declared that “the season of silence is over,” positioning himself as the voice of a constituency ready to reclaim its influence.

Kiffo’s promises centered on renewal, opportunity, and social empowerment, including:

• Creating jobs and economic opportunities for youth and local entrepreneurs.

• Revitalizing roads, health centers, and community infrastructure.

• Supporting farmers and fishers with better access to tools and markets.

• Making education and skills training a top priority.

• Promoting unity across political lines, while holding leadership accountable.

His vision taps into emotion — one that speaks to those who feel left out or unheard. It’s the voice of renewal versus the comfort of stability.

⚖️ The Core Difference: Continuity vs Change

At the heart of this political duel is a simple question:

Do the people of Choiseul/Saltibus want to continue building on what exists, or do they want to start fresh with new energy and ideas?

Bradley Felix represents the continuation of a known formula — steady governance, gradual development, and experience in navigating the national system.
Kiffo Charles represents the break from the old, the emergence of a younger, louder generation eager to leave a mark.

🌴 What the Voters Must Consider

Voters will have to decide which vision best aligns with their lived reality.
Do they feel progress has been steady enough under Bradley’s stewardship?
Or do they share Kiffo’s view that the people’s voices have been ignored for too long?

Either way, the upcoming election promises to be one of the most defining moments in Choiseul’s political story — not just about personalities, but about the direction of leadership for the next decade.

✍️ Final Thought

Both men love Choiseul. Both claim to serve without discrimination. Yet their roads to the same destination couldn’t be more different.
Whether voters choose the calm of continuity or the energy of change, one truth remains — Choiseul/Saltibus is awake, alert, and ready to make its voice heard.

🇱🇨 When the Numbers Tell a Story: Chastanet and Frederick Agree—$240 Million from CIP!

Politics, as fiery as it gets in Saint Lucia, sometimes produces rare moments of accidental agreement between rivals. That’s exactly what happened this week when former Prime Minister Allen Chastanet and current Minister of Housing Richard Frederick—two men who rarely share a political sentence without sparks—ended up confirming the same financial truth: the Citizenship by Investment Programme (CIP) brought in an astonishing $240 million between March 2024 and March 2025.

  Richard Frederick’s Revelation

In a recent public address, Minister Frederick proudly declared that Saint Lucia’s CIP generated EC$240 million in just one year, describing it as one of the programme’s strongest performances since inception. His tone was triumphant—proof, he said, of investor confidence and the administration’s success in managing the programme.

“The CIP brought in between March 2024 and March 2025 about $240 million. Are you hearing me? Two hundred and forty million dollars in one year!”

That statement was meant to showcase economic achievement—a feather in the government’s cap and a signal that Saint Lucia was performing well on the international investment front.

  Chastanet’s Counterpunch

But politics is a chess game, and Allen Chastanet, the former Prime Minister and leader of the opposition, immediately seized the same figure to challenge the government’s credibility.

Speaking on the campaign trail, he echoed Frederick’s own words to drive home a question Saint Lucians have been asking for months:

“Phillip J. Pierre said he made $240 million from the CIP. So, where is the money? Why do we still have the 2.5% Health and Security Levy? Why are gas prices still high?”

Chastanet argued that if the country indeed raked in such a large sum, there should be visible relief for citizens—lower fuel costs, lighter taxes, and better services. His wider point was that the government, despite record revenue, still claims it cannot complete major projects like St. Jude Hospital, which he said now carries a combined price tag of nearly $400 million over four administrations.

  The St. Jude Factor

Here’s where the debate gets even more interesting. Chastanet told supporters that the government called early elections because it cannot finish St. Jude Hospital.

According to him:

• Dr. Kenny Anthony’s administration spent around $100 million,
• Philip J. Pierre’s administration has since spent $300 million,
• And yet, the hospital remains unfinished.

While the exact numbers may differ depending on which report one cites, few would deny that St. Jude has become a symbol of prolonged political failure. For over sixteen years, the hospital has been rebuilt, redesigned, relocated, and re-budgeted—each administration pointing fingers while the people wait for a functioning facility.

  The Common Thread: Accountability

Regardless of political color, one fact now stands beyond dispute—$240 million flowed through the CIP in a single year. That’s Richard Frederick’s number, and Allen Chastanet’s argument simply amplifies it.

What separates them is not the data, but the direction of the question:

• Frederick says, “Look how well we’ve done.”
• Chastanet asks, “Then why is the country still struggling?”

And that, Saint Lucians, is where accountability meets reality. It is not enough to boast of millions earned; the nation must also see where and how those millions were spent.

  The Bigger Picture

As Saint Lucia heads toward the December 2025 general elections, both men—one in government, one seeking to return—have handed voters a gift: proof that the money exists. The challenge now is to demand clarity.

If $240 million entered our national coffers through the CIP, the public deserves to know:

• How much went into the National Economic Fund?
• How much was used for actual projects?
• And how much remains in reserve or unaccounted for?

  Final Word

For once, Chastanet and Frederick are singing the same note, even if to different tunes. The CIP is producing big money, but unless that wealth is matched by transparency, relief, and visible national development, Saint Lucians will continue to ask—loudly and rightfully—“Where is the money?”

"You’ll Easier See a Green Donkey”: Dr. Alphonsus St. Rose’s Hard-Hitting Call for Accountability

The nation woke up this morning to the announcement that Saint Lucia’s Parliament has been dissolved — and that general elections will be held on December 1, 2025.

As citizens begin weighing their choices, one online discussion has captured the heart of the public debate. On my Facebook page, I asked a simple but serious question:

“How much has really been spent on St. Jude, and what exactly have we gotten for it so far? Inquiring minds want to know!"

It was a question meant to spark reflection — and it did. Among the many responses, one stood out sharply for its depth, precision, and patriotic honesty. It came from none other than Dr. Alphonsus St. Rose, a proud Choiseulian by birth and long-time advocate for health reform and good governance.

Here’s what Dr. St. Rose had to say:

“Trust me, that tab from 2009 to 2025 (and still counting), spanning four administrations and sixteen years, must shamefully be in excess of half a billion dollars for that. What is even worse is we as a nation and a people are expected to celebrate (at its opening) that level of political negligence with no accountability or transparency. You will easier see a green donkey before you ever get to know the true cost of this contagion. It is for this reason we must command value and purpose to our vote by demanding our government to enact a FOIA, because unlike Caesar's wife, our governments are not beyond suspicion!”

A Question That Struck a Nerve

Dr. St. Rose’s response cuts to the bone of our national conscience. What started as a simple social media question quickly turned into a moment of reckoning for all Saint Lucians — especially those who have watched the St. Jude saga unfold for nearly two decades.

The hospital reconstruction project, born from the ashes of tragedy in 2009, has now become a lasting symbol of political failure and financial secrecy. Sixteen years, four administrations, and hundreds of millions later, Saint Lucians still have no clear public accounting of the total cost.

A National Lesson in Neglect

Each government has had its chance to “fix St. Jude.” Each one promised to deliver. Yet the final product has been delays, reworks, investigations, and shifting narratives. The end result is a structure clouded by mystery, mistrust, and unanswered questions.

As Dr. St. Rose boldly stated, we are expected to celebrate this outcome — as if completion alone justifies the political negligence that led us here. His “green donkey” metaphor captures the absurdity perfectly: it will take a miracle before Saint Lucians ever see the real figures or understand how their money was spent.

The Call for Transparency and FOIA

At the heart of his message lies a demand for a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) — legislation that would finally empower citizens to access government records, contracts, and expenditure data. Such an Act would prevent future governments from hiding behind confidentiality clauses or partisan spin.

Transparency should not depend on political convenience; it should be the default standard of governance. As Dr. St. Rose reminded us, “unlike Caesar’s wife, our governments are not beyond suspicion.”

An Election About Integrity

With elections now officially called, this conversation must rise beyond party lines. The St. Jude issue is not red or yellow — it is a national disgrace that calls for a new political culture.

Voters must now decide whether they will continue to reward empty talk and opacity, or whether they will use the power of their vote to demand accountability, audited results, and legislative reform.

As one citizen’s Facebook question met one Choiseulian’s fearless truth, the message became clear: Saint Lucia cannot afford another sixteen years of silence.

Until the people demand honesty in governance, we might all keep chasing that same green donkey down the same old road.

#AccountabilityNow #FOIAForStLucia #StJudeHospital #Elections2025 #ChoiseulSpeaks #TransparencyMatters

Call for a Memorial Monument at Morne Sion to Honour the Victims of the 2011 Choiseul Tragedy

PRESS RELEASE

Date: November 9, 2025

Subject: Call for a Memorial Monument at Morne Sion to Honour the Victims of the 2011 Choiseul Tragedy

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Choiseul, Saint Lucia —
As the community of Choiseul and the wider nation prepare to mark the 14th anniversary of the tragic Morne Sion accident of November 10, 2011, Choiseul on the Move calls upon both political candidates for the Choiseul/Saltibus constituency—Mr. Bradley Felix (United Workers Party) and Mr. Keithson “Kiffo” Charles (Saint Lucia Labour Party)—to make a solemn and public commitment to the people of Choiseul:

Deliver a permanent monument at the Morne Sion crash site before the next anniversary.

---

Background

On the evening of Thursday, November 10, 2011, a minibus carrying mourners returning from a funeral in Micoud plunged off a cliff into the sea at Morne Sion, Choiseul.
Seventeen lives were lost—including men, women, children, and an expectant mother. It remains one of the most devastating accidents in Saint Lucia’s modern history.

In the weeks that followed, there were many promises and pledges of remembrance. The then Prime Minister, Dr. Kenny Anthony, publicly expressed his government’s intention to erect a memorial monument at the site. Yet, fourteen years later, no such monument exists.
The only reminder at the scene today is a set of culvert barriers—cold, impersonal, and inadequate to represent the pain, faith, and loss that the Choiseul community endured that night.

A Community Still Hurting

Every year, families from Dugard, Fond Lor, and the surrounding areas quietly mark the anniversary.
For them, the absence of a formal memorial is not just an oversight—it is a painful symbol of forgotten promises.

This press release, therefore, is not political.
It is moral.
It is humanitarian.
It is an appeal from a community that refuses to let memory die in silence.

Our Call to Action

We call upon both Mr. Felix and Mr. Charles, as sons of Choiseul and aspirants to represent its people, to:

1. Publicly pledge to erect a Memorial Monument at Morne Sion by November 10, 2026.
2. Collaborate with local families, church leaders, and community representatives on the design and placement of the monument.
3. Ensure transparency regarding funding, location, and maintenance.
4. Include the names of all victims on the monument, as a mark of eternal remembrance.

This is not a matter of politics—it is a matter of dignity.
Leadership begins with empathy, and the people of Choiseul/Saltibus deserve leaders who can honour their own.

Why It Matters

The Morne Sion tragedy stands as a scar on the national conscience.
It reminds us of the fragility of life, the power of community, and the responsibility of leaders to act where words once failed.

A monument at the crash site would:

• Preserve our history for future generations.
• Offer closure to the bereaved.
• Serve as a national reminder of road safety and compassion.
• Restore pride in a community that bore unimaginable pain.

A Final Word

Choiseul on the Move is urging both candidates—before the campaign dust settles—to take a united stand on this humanitarian issue.
Commit publicly, follow through faithfully, and let your legacy in Choiseul/Saltibus begin not with division, but with honour.

Let November 10th, 2026, be a day of healing, not just remembering.

Issued by:
Choiseul on the Move
Community Blog and Civic Platform
📧 choiseul.inform@gmail.com
🌐 https://choiseul-inform.blogspot.com

Wickham’s Warning: Pierre Won’t Call Election Without a Clear Edge — What Does That Really Mean?ñ

Caribbean pollster Peter Wickham has dropped a subtle but significant observation about Saint Lucia’s political climate. Speaking recently on regional media, Wickham suggested that Prime Minister Philip J. Pierre will not risk calling a general election until he’s certain that his Saint Lucia Labour Party (SLP) has a clear advantage at the polls.

That statement might sound like cautious leadership — but beneath the surface, it tells a bigger story about where both major political parties stand right now.

A Waiting Game from the Top

According to Wickham, Pierre is playing it safe. The Prime Minister appears to be carefully watching the political winds, waiting for the perfect moment to strike — perhaps after the official opening of the St. Jude Hospital or another major government project.

This signals one thing loud and clear: Pierre is not yet convinced his government has the edge. In politics, timing is everything — and when a leader refuses to roll the dice early, it usually means the numbers aren’t as strong as they’d like.

The UWP Factor

If Pierre’s caution tells one story, the United Workers Party’s (UWP) growing confidence tells another. Across constituencies, the UWP has been visibly re-energized, holding rallies, announcing youth movements, and sharpening its messaging.

Wickham himself noted that the “campaign environment is heating up,” with both parties active on the ground. That’s pollster language for: “the race is tightening.”

The UWP’s message appears to be landing, especially among voters who feel disillusioned by the slow pace of economic relief and the long wait for completed projects like St. Jude. Even if the opposition hasn’t yet taken the lead, it’s clearly on the move — enough to make the SLP hesitate.

Reading Between the Lines

When a sitting government avoids early elections, it’s rarely out of comfort. It’s out of calculated caution. Wickham’s remark reveals that the Prime Minister wants to ensure that when he finally rings the bell, the conditions — public mood, project completion, and economic signals — are perfectly aligned in his favor.

In short, he’s waiting for the “clear edge.”

But politics rarely offers guarantees. By waiting too long, Pierre also risks giving the opposition more time to organize, build momentum, and define the narrative — especially in marginal constituencies like Choiseul/Saltibus, Dennery North, and Castries South-East, where swings decide elections.

The Road Ahead

Saint Lucia may not see an election date announced until key deliverables are completed and the polls lean red. Until then, Wickham’s analysis serves as a quiet reminder that the political ground is shifting.

Whether it’s genuine UWP momentum or SLP strategic patience, one thing is clear — both sides know the next election won’t be a walkover.

The battle lines are being drawn, and the countdown has quietly begun.

Written by Dedan Jn Baptiste for Election Power Watch — keeping Choiseul and Saint Lucia informed, one pulse at a time.

Special Report - November 6th, 2025

When the Speaker Loses His Cool: The St. Jude Debate That Got Personal

Saint Lucia’s political space is no stranger to heated exchanges — but few could have predicted that the Speaker of the House of Assembly, the very guardian of parliamentary order, would trade that gavel for a Facebook keyboard to spar with an ordinary citizen. Yet, that’s exactly what happened this week.

It all began when Claudius Francis, Speaker of the House, published a lengthy Facebook post titled “The St. Jude Crisis and the Rhetoric of Opposition: Analysing the UWP’s Desperation.”
In it, he painted the United Workers Party as a “desperate opposition,” accusing them of weaponizing cost figures and trying to sabotage the government’s success on the long-delayed St. Jude Hospital project.

That post might have gone unnoticed — until I, Dedan, weighed in. My comment was simple:

“Saint Lucians deserve clarity on how hundreds of millions have been spent, why the hospital is still uncommissioned, and what exactly we’re getting for the money.”

And that’s when the conversation took off.

From Commentary to Confrontation

Instead of addressing the substance of the question, the Speaker fired back with sarcasm — mocking my stance, suggesting I was “drinking the kool-aid,” and implying that anyone who questioned the government’s narrative was somehow delusional or politically driven.

But the irony was striking: here was the Speaker of the House, a man constitutionally required to remain neutral, diving head-first into partisan defense mode — not as an observer of debate, but as a participant in it.

When I pressed for accountability, he shifted gears again — claiming to be “better located” to know the real figures, dismissing my sources, and then, when cornered, suggesting that Dedan might be a pseudonym.

At that point, it became clear this wasn’t about St. Jude anymore. It was about ego, partisanship, and an alarming inability to separate the Speaker’s office from party politics.

A Name, a Nerve, and a National Question

To his claim that “Dedan” was a pseudonym, I responded:

“Ask your brother Hermingild who Dedan is. He’ll tell you exactly who I am. I’ve been writing, speaking, and standing up for accountability in Choiseul long before politics turned into performance art.”

And yes, I meant every word.

Because the real issue here is not who’s speaking — it’s why the speaking is necessary. St. Jude Hospital represents one of the most painful and expensive chapters in Saint Lucia’s modern history. It has cost taxpayers over $400 million across successive administrations, yet remains uncommissioned.

When ordinary citizens ask legitimate questions about that, it’s not “opposition rhetoric.” It’s civic duty. And when high-ranking officials — especially one sitting in the Speaker’s chair — respond with partisanship and mockery, it raises serious concerns about how far political tribalism has gone in this country.

Accountability Isn’t a Crime

Let’s be clear: the St. Jude debate is not about red or yellow. It’s about the green of taxpayers’ dollars and the human cost of political gamesmanship.

If the government truly believes in transparency, let them publish:

• The final cost of the project;
• The timeline for commissioning;
• And the list of contractors and expenditures since 2021.

Saint Lucians are not asking for favors — we’re asking for facts.

The Exchange That Got Saint Lucia Talking

What began as a simple comment turned into a fiery, public debate between a citizen and the Speaker himself — a discussion that quickly revealed the cracks in Saint Lucia’s political civility.

Below is the full transcript of that exchange, shared for transparency and context. Readers can judge for themselves who argued with reason and who resorted to ridicule.

👉 Read the full conversation: St_Jude_Facebook_Debate_Dedan_vs_Claudius.docx

Choiseul on the Move
Because truth should never be silenced by titles. 🇱🇨

⁸🎶 Election Time Again – The Song That Still Speaks to Choiseul/Saltibus Today

Back in the 2006, during one of the most memorable local Calypso shows hosted by the Roblot Combined School, a young performer known as Mighty Kent a student from La Maze, took to the stage with a song that would echo through generations — “Election Time Again.”

Penned and composed by Dedan, the song carried a message that was both witty and wise, capturing the spirit of an era when community consciousness was high, and political awareness was alive and well. The chorus remains unforgettable:

🎵 Election coming,
Politics playing,
Dem running par ici, running par là,
Asking for we vote,
But if they want me vote,
Dem have to be positive,
‘Cause this year,
Me ain’t playing coco makak! 🎵

🎤 The Message in the Music

Behind its catchy rhythm and playful phrasing was a profound declaration of independence — a call for accountability, integrity, and vision.

“Dem have to be positive” wasn’t just a lyric — it was a statement of principle. It reminded both leaders and voters that leadership is not about charm; it’s about character. The chorus pushed listeners to demand more than smiles, T-shirts, and temporary handouts. It demanded genuine progress.

The song told us, in simple Calypso style, that elections are not carnival — and voters must stop “playing coco makak,” or being easily fooled by political showmanship. It was a call for maturity and wisdom in our democracy.

🗳️ Fast Forward to Choiseul/Saltibus Today

Decades later, as the Choiseul/Saltibus constituency prepares for another heated election cycle, the lyrics of “Election Time Again” feel prophetic.

Once again, we see the familiar rhythm: politicians “running par ici, running par là,” popping up in communities they’ve neglected for years. Suddenly, roads are fixed, donations flow, and every corner hears promises of a brighter tomorrow.

But Choiseulians have grown wiser. They’ve learned to see through the glitter and listen for substance. Across Roblot, La Fargue, Piaye, Reunion, and Delcer, the old chorus rings louder than ever — “Dem have to be positive!”

🧠 A Reminder for Every Voter

The message of “Election Time Again” is timeless because it puts responsibility back where it belongs — in the hands of the people.

Before marking that “X,” ask yourself:

✅ Who has truly worked for the people?
✅ Who has been visible, consistent, and accountable?
✅ Who brings a real plan — not just promises?

Our votes should reward performance, not pageantry.

🚫 No More “Coco Makak” Politics

In 2025 and beyond, let the message of Mighty Kent and Dedan echo through every corner of Choiseul/Saltibus:

If politicians want our votes, they must come with positivity, purpose, and proof of performance.

Anything less is just more “coco makak.”

#ElectionTimeAgain #ChoiseulPolitics #Dedan #MightyKent #RoblotCombinedSchool #StLuciaCalypso #CocoMakak #VoterAwareness #SLPElections #UWPElections #ChoiseulOnTheMove

UWP’s “Youth SOS Plan”: Smart Policy or Strategic Positioning?

In the heat of Saint Lucia’s pre-election atmosphere, the United Workers Party (UWP) has rolled out its Youth SOS Plan — a seven-point proposal that speaks directly to one of the country’s most restless and crucial demographics: the youth.

At first glance, the plan reads like an ambitious blueprint for empowerment — mortgage guarantees, business grants, digital training, and even cultural representation through the Dennery Segment movement. But beneath the promises lies a clear political signal: the UWP is making a deliberate bid to reposition itself as the party of youthful renewal and opportunity.

Rebranding for the Next Generation

After the 2021 defeat, the UWP faced the challenge of reconnecting with a generation that sees politics through a very different lens — one shaped by social media, digital entrepreneurship, and frustration over job stagnation. The Youth SOS Plan functions as both a policy proposal and a rebranding exercise.

By packaging the plan in modern language — “digital economy,” “youth ambassadors,” “grants up to $25,000” — the party signals that it understands the evolving aspirations of today’s young Saint Lucians. It’s a pivot from traditional politics toward a vision of inclusion and innovation.

A Political Lifeline

The name itself, “SOS,” is clever — it suggests urgency, rescue, and revival. Politically, it positions the UWP as the solution to a generation in distress. In a campaign environment where unemployment, emigration, and disillusionment dominate youth conversations, that emotional appeal could be powerful.

The move also challenges the ruling Saint Lucia Labour Party (SLP) to explain what tangible progress it has delivered for young people beyond slogans and short-term programmes. By forcing that comparison, the UWP hopes to shift the national dialogue — from partisan blame to generational opportunity.

Turning Youth into a Political Force

Another strategic layer of the plan lies in participation. Expanding the National Youth Council, appointing youth ambassadors, and integrating young voices into policymaking structures — these aren’t just governance ideas; they’re recruitment channels.

In political terms, it’s about mobilizing youth not only as beneficiaries but as stakeholders — future voters who see themselves reflected in the UWP’s framework. That could energize ground operations across key constituencies, especially in battleground areas like Choiseul/Saltibus, Dennery North, and Castries South.

The Balancing Act

Still, there’s a thin line between promise and practicality. Critics, including Prime Minister Philip J. Pierre, have branded the plan “unrealistic” — suggesting it’s more campaign rhetoric than executable policy. Yet, that criticism itself plays into the UWP’s narrative: that the government doesn’t believe in youth dreams.

In that sense, even rejection serves the UWP’s strategy. It reinforces their image as the bold reformers challenging an establishment that “lacks imagination.”

Final Word

Whether the Youth SOS Plan becomes a genuine policy roadmap or remains a powerful political talking point will depend on two things: execution and credibility. But one thing is clear — by putting youth at the centre of its platform, the UWP has positioned itself at the heart of the generational conversation shaping Saint Lucia’s next election.

St. Jude Hospital: The Promise, The Pause, and the New “Opening”

For sixteen long years, the people of the south—especially those in Vieux-Fort, Augier, and the surrounding communities—have been waiting for one word: “open.” The St. Jude Hospital project has lived through four administrations, multiple designs, millions in taxpayer funds, and countless political promises. But here we are, in late 2025, still asking the same question: When will it finally open?

The Original Promise

Prime Minister Philip J. Pierre made a bold declaration earlier this year—St. Jude Hospital will open its doors in 2025. His words carried hope for the south, a region that has endured over a decade of medical displacement since the 2009 fire. The promise of an opening before the next general election sounded like the long-awaited light at the end of the tunnel.

The Changing Tune

Fast forward a few months, and the tone has noticeably shifted. Now, the message is that the building will be “opened,” but the hospital will be “commissioned later.”

To the average Saint Lucian, that distinction may sound like semantics—but it’s more than that. An “opening” without “commissioning” means the structure will be showcased, but the hospital may not yet be fully operational, staffed, or ready to serve patients. In other words, the doors may open, but not the wards.

Why This Matters

This kind of linguistic backpedaling—however subtle—raises important questions about accountability and transparency. For years, St. Jude Hospital has symbolized both political failure and public patience. People want more than photo ops and ribbon cuttings; they want functioning wards, working equipment, and reliable healthcare services.

So when the narrative shifts from “We will open St. Jude before elections” to “We will open the building, but commission later,” citizens are right to feel shortchanged. It feels like getting a 6 for 9—a downgrade, a diluted version of what was promised.

The Reality on the Ground

Contractors and technicians have reportedly completed 98.5 percent of the work. The Rayneau Construction team, in particular, has remained on site to finalize installations and facilitate the transition from the George Odlum Stadium back to the hospital grounds.
Everything seems to suggest that the physical structure is ready. So, what’s holding back the commissioning? Bureaucracy? Equipment delays? Or politics?

The Verdict

Saint Lucians have heard “almost there” too many times. It’s not enough to open doors; the country needs a fully functional hospital—not another staged event timed for political convenience.

When the Prime Minister promised that St. Jude would be opened before the election, he set a clear expectation. Now that the message has changed, the people deserve an equally clear explanation. Because for patients in the south, “commissioning later” isn’t just a delay—it’s another year of waiting for real care.

#StJudeHospital #Accountability #PhilipJPierre #VieuxFort #RayneauGajadhar #StLucia

The Ringcomb Distraction: Let’s Get Back to Real Issues

Lately, social media has been buzzing with chatter about Bradley Felix’s ringcomb—and honestly, it’s gotten old. What started as casual banter has now become an unnecessary talking point, even making its way into Kiffo’s official campaign launch speech. That alone should make us pause and ask, is this really what our politics has come to?

Personal Expression Is Not a Political Crime

Since when did a man’s hairstyle become a matter of national debate? Whether it’s plaits, cornrows, locs, or a simple ringcomb, personal grooming is exactly that—personal. Men across the world wear their hair in various ways, and it doesn’t make them any less capable, intelligent, or committed to service.
During this year’s CSEC exams, some of the Caribbean’s top scholars wore their hair in its natural, unstyled state. Did that stop them from excelling? Absolutely not. Hair does not define excellence—discipline, focus, and vision do.

A Candidate’s Focus Should Be the People

That’s why it was disappointing to hear Kiffo highlight something as trivial as another man’s hair during his big night.
At a time when the people of Choiseul/Saltibus are craving serious leadership—talks about road repairs, water access, jobs, youth development, and community investment—turning the spotlight on someone’s hairstyle is nothing short of tone-deaf.
Voters are not amused. They want depth, solutions, and direction—not distractions.

Raising the Level of the Debate

We expect better. Our community deserves candidates who use their platforms to inform, inspire, and lead. There’s too much at stake in this election to waste time on superficial jabs.
If Kiffo wants to prove he’s serious about leadership, he must stick to the issues that truly matter to the people:

• Better roads and infrastructure
• Access to clean, reliable water
• Youth empowerment programs
• Support for small businesses and farmers
• Opportunities that help families thrive

Final Word

It’s time to move past the ringcomb distractions and focus on what really matters. Saint Lucians are too intelligent and too experienced to fall for cheap diversions. The people of Choiseul/Saltibus deserve a campaign built on vision—not vanity

Fact Check: How True Was Kiffo’s “New Beginning” Speech?

CHOISEUL/SALTIBUS — November 3, 2025.

Last Sunday night, under light showers and loud cheers, Keithson “Kiffo” Charles took the stage at La Fargue Playing Field for his official campaign launch.
His message was bold — “The season of silence is over.”
It was a promise to turn trust, legacy, and service into what he called “a new beginning” for the people of Choiseul and Saltibus.

But beyond the inspiring tone and hometown emotion, how did his claims hold up under the facts?
Here’s a closer look — plain, fair, and easy to follow.

1️⃣ “We are the party that pays CXC fees.” — ✅ Mostly True

Since 2022, the government has been paying examination fees for up to four subjects per student writing CSEC. Some parents still pay for extra subjects, but the core claim is true — government now shoulders most of the CXC cost for fifth-formers.

2️⃣ “We are the party that provides laptops.” — ✅ True

Every secondary school student now receives a government-issued laptop or Chromebook. The initiative was restarted under the current administration in 2022 and continues into 2025. It’s one of the few education policies that have earned bipartisan praise.

3️⃣ “We delivered a real minimum wage.” — ✅ True

Yes. Saint Lucia officially implemented a national minimum wage of $6.52 per hour (about $1,131 a month) in October 2024. It’s the first structured national wage floor in decades, confirmed by the Labour Department.

4️⃣ “We increased pensions.” — ✅ True

NIC pensioners received a 4.2% increase in 2022, another in 2024, and a 3.9% raise this year (2025). The government also increased the minimum pension for low-income retirees. Kiffo was right on this one.

5️⃣ “We made caregivers permanent.” — ✅ True

On October 8, 2025, 667 Home Care Providers were officially given permanent government status. That’s a confirmed and historic labour upgrade. Many of those workers come from rural areas like Choiseul, Saltibus, and Laborie.

6️⃣ “We will deliver St. Jude Hospital.” — ⚠️ In Progress

Kiffo’s confidence on St. Jude was heartfelt, but not fully factual. The hospital is still under construction with finishing works ongoing in Vieux Fort. The Prime Minister has promised completion “soon,” but there’s no public date for its opening yet.

7️⃣ “Hundreds of acres were given away for 99 cents an acre.” — ⚠️ Contested

This was a jab at the 2016 DSH land-lease deal in Vieux Fort.
Opposition sources claim hundreds of acres were leased for 99 years at $1 per acre.
The former government insists only part of the racetrack lands were leased under that term. Until the full document is released publicly, this remains a political claim, not a confirmed fact.

8️⃣ “EC$1.6M in constituency development funds — where are the projects?” — ❌ Unverified

While every MP receives annual allocations for community projects, there’s no official breakdown publicly confirming that Choiseul/Saltibus got $1.6 million. The number could be correct, but no transparent report exists.
Still, Kiffo’s question about “Where are the results?” is fair and resonant with voters.

---

9️⃣ “Most new community tourism projects come from Choiseul.” — ⚠️ Unproven

The national Community Tourism Programme is real and active, and Choiseul has benefitted through its Arts & Craft Centre and local eco projects.
However, official figures don’t show Choiseul leading the country in project numbers — that claim was more rally rhetoric than record.

10️⃣ “All Souls Day is November 2.” — ✅ True

A small but poetic detail — and yes, All Souls Day always falls on November 2. Kiffo cleverly tied the day of remembrance to his message of new beginnings.

What the Speech Got Right

Kiffo’s biggest strength wasn’t in statistics — it was in tone.
He delivered a speech rooted in gratitude, history, and genuine community spirit.
His stories about helping families pay light bills and raising funds for the sick humanized him as “the neighbour who cares,” not just a politician seeking office.

Where It Needs Proof

When it came to big-ticket issues — like St. Jude’s completion, CDF spending, or land deals — some claims stretched beyond what the records show.
That’s not unusual for campaign launches, but as the campaign heats up, voters will expect receipts, not just rhetoric.

Bottom Line

Keithson “Kiffo” Charles’s maiden speech was a powerful and emotional debut.
It spoke directly to the hearts of Choiseulians who’ve long felt overlooked.
Most of his policy points check out with government data, though a few remain political talking points awaiting evidence.

Whether voters see this as the dawn of “a new beginning” or just another well-crafted campaign promise will depend on how much proof follows the passion.

📎 Read the Full Transcript:
Download Kiffo’s Full Speech (Word)

Janelle Charles Welcomes the People of Choiseul to a Night of Unity and Inspiration

In a heartfelt and passionate address, Janelle Charles took the stage on Sunday evening to welcome residents, supporters, and youth of the Choiseul community to what she described as “a night of vision, purpose, and people coming together.”

Speaking before a vibrant crowd, Janelle’s message was clear — Choiseul is ready for change, and it starts with unity.

“It is truly an honor to stand before you tonight and welcome you to this special gathering — one that celebrates community, vision, and the power of people coming together with purpose,” she began, her voice filled with confidence and pride.

Representing the youth of Choiseul, Janelle reminded the audience that this moment was bigger than politics — it was about people believing in themselves, their leaders, and their future.

“We are here because we believe in progress, we believe in possibility, and most importantly, we believe in people,” she said to loud applause.

Janelle spoke of the growing confidence among young people in the community, emphasizing that their voices are not only being heard but valued. She credited Mr. Keithson Charles for being a leader who listens, encourages, and provides opportunities for young individuals to grow.

“Leaders like Mr. Charle5s remind us that our voices matter — that our ideas, creativity, and energy are vital to shaping the future of Choiseul,” she added.

Her welcome set the perfect tone for the evening — one filled with optimism, togetherness, and renewed belief in what can be achieved when a community stands united.

Janelle closed her address with an uplifting call:

“Tonight, as we come together — young and old, families and friends — let’s open our hearts, lift our voices, and celebrate what’s possible when we move forward together. Welcome everyone, and let’s make it a night to remember!”

Her words captured not only the spirit of the youth but also the collective heartbeat of Choiseul — a community ready to move forward with confidence, hope, and purpose.

Kiffo Charles Launches Campaign with a Call for “A New Beginning”

CHOISEUL/SALTIBUS – November 2, 2025.

Yy

The night skies over La Farge Playing Field were heavy with showers of blessing, but that didn’t stop supporters from gathering as Keithson “Kiffo” Charles officially launched his political journey under the banner of the Saint Lucia Labour Party.

What unfolded was no ordinary stump speech—it was a declaration of intent, a pledge of trust, and a reminder that the once-quiet constituency of Choiseul/Saltibus has a voice that’s ready to be heard.

From Silence to Signal

“Too long our silence has been mistaken for satisfaction,” Charles declared. “The season of silence is over.”
The crowd erupted, sensing the rebirth of political energy in a community often described as calm and reserved. His words set the tone for a night that mixed personal testimony with sweeping promises.

Building Trust Brick by Brick

Kiffo’s speech was deeply personal. He recounted wiring homes as an electrician, helping families keep their lights on, and playing music to raise funds for the sick.
“Every house wired, every fundraiser was a brick in the foundation of trust,” he said. That simple message—service before power—struck home with a constituency weary of empty talk.

The Policy Punchlines

Charles used the platform to underline the government’s record: payment of CXC fees, laptop distribution, a new minimum wage, higher pensions, and permanent status for hundreds of home-care workers.
He promised that the long-awaited St. Jude Hospital will soon be completed and vowed to never “give away our lands” as he referenced the controversial Vieux Fort land-lease deal.

The Vision: A New Beginning

Kiffo’s recurring phrase—“a new beginning”—became the heartbeat of the night.
He laid out a plan for community-based development:

• a multi-purpose mini-stadium at La Fargue to revive sports glory,

• better road access for valleys like Ravineau, Caffiére and Park Estate,

• stronger community tourism and artisan support,

• and a revived Queen Show and Carnival tradition celebrating Choiseul’s culture and beauty.

He also promised to champion farmers and youth entrepreneurs, pledging to lobby Cabinet “until the South gets its fair share.”

A Constituency Rooted in Legacy

Invoking the memory of his late uncles Dr. Augustine “King Bolo” Charles and Joseph “T Charles” Charles, and the enduring influence of his grandmother, Kiffo placed himself squarely within the lineage of Choiseul’s “cradle of giants.”
He proudly listed the likes of Dr. Kenny Anthony, George Theophilus, Goddard Darcheville, and Vernon Francois as proof of the community’s historic leadership role in Saint Lucia’s progress.

Fact Check and Reality Check

Much of Kiffo’s policy praise—CXC fees, laptops, wage reform, pension adjustments, and caregiver regularisation—aligns with government records.
However, some promises and critiques, such as the “99 cents per acre” land claim and the EC $1.6 million CDF allocation, remain politically contested. Independent data verification will be essential as the campaign unfolds.

An Emotional Close

Closing just before midnight, Charles reminded the audience that the date—All Souls Day—was sacred.
“Let tonight mark the end of the old way,” he said. “And let tomorrow, my birthday, be the first day of our new beginning.”
The crowd responded with chants of “Better Together.”

Final Word

Kiffo Charles’s launch speech was not short on passion, history, or ambition. It connected deeply with local emotion while sketching a bold, forward-looking roadmap.
Whether the promises survive the test of governance will depend on that same theme he hammered all night—trust.

👉 Read the full transcript: Download the complete speech (Word)

Red or Yellow – Choiseul–Saltibus Heats Up This Weekend!

The excitement is electric this weekend as both major political forces take the stage — one in Choiseul and the other in Micoud — waving their colors and rallying their supporters with fiery passion and youthful energy.

Tomorrow all eyes will be on Choiseul–Saltibus, where the Saint Lucia Labour Party (SLP) officially launches its candidate Keithson “Kiffo” Charles. The Pitons will echo with the chant “The Mood Is Red!” — a symbol of determination, people power, and pride. The red flag flutters against the backdrop of Gros Piton, representing courage, resilience, and the will to serve. For Kiffo and his team, it’s more than just a color — it’s a declaration that the people’s movement is alive and ready to deliver.

The same day brings its own explosion of color and rhythm as UNITED YOUTH presents:
🎉 CLOCK IT — THE YOUTH REVOLUTION RALLY!

📍 Utopia Gardens, Ti Rocher Micoud
🗓️  Gates Open 2PM

Get ready for a full-on youth invasion — a celebration of energy, vision, and empowerment.
🎤 The stage will light up with DJ PROSTYLE — The People’s Selector, DJ GRINDS — Mr. Turn Up Himself, and DJ NYROSE — Spinning Fire All Day!
💛 Expect a motorcade from all 17 constituencies, youth speakers, creative showcases, and concert vibes that blend empowerment with pure entertainment.

As the UWP youth movement rallies under the bold yellow banner, one message shines bright: “YELLOW IS THE CODE!” The color of light and optimism, it symbolizes fresh thinking, youthful leadership, and the drive to shape a better Saint Lucia.

Whether it’s the SLP’s red of passion or the UWP’s yellow of hope, one thing is clear — this weekend belongs to the people. Both events represent what democracy should look like: vibrant, engaged, and full of life.

So, from Choiseul to Micoud, wave your flag with pride, stay safe, and let your color fly high.
Because at the end of the day — red or yellow — we are all one nation, one people, one Saint Lucia. 🇱🇨

#UnitedYouth #ClockIt #YouthRevolution #UtopiaVibes #KiffoLaunch #ChoiseulOnTheMove #RedOrYellow #SaintLuciaStrong

Series: Part 1 • Part 2 • Part 3 • Part 4

About this series: "Your Health, Your Vote" is a four-part explainer designed to help Saint Lucians clearly understand what’s on the table in this election when it comes to healthcare. We strip away the political noise and compare the United Workers Party (UWP) and the Saint Lucia Labour Party (SLP) health proposals side-by-side — their costs, benefits, and challenges — so that you can make an informed, confident decision at the ballot box. Because in the end, the vote that matters most is the one that protects your family’s health.

Your Health, Your Vote (Part 4): The Comparison Table + Smart Questions to Ask

Estimated read: 4 minutes

Quick Comparison

Feature	UWP – Enhanced NHI	SLP – Universal Health Care
Core Model	Public–private insurance system	Publicly funded healthcare for all
How You Pay	Monthly premiums	Through taxes
Cost at Point of Care	Low or none	Free
Choice of Provider	High (public & private)	Limited (mainly public)
Goal	Access & Choice	Equity & Universal Access
Key Challenge	Premium affordability	Wait times, tax burden

Smart questions to ask candidates

1. How exactly will the NHI premiums or UHC taxes be calculated?
2. Which drugs and procedures are guaranteed in each plan?
3. How will rural communities access timely care?
4. What’s the strategy for staffing and supplies?
5. How will transparency and accountability be maintained?

Your personal checklist

• Do I value choice or universal access more?
• Can I afford premiums or prefer tax-based coverage?
• Which system do I trust to deliver results?

Final word: You’re not just voting for a party — you’re voting for the kind of healthcare Saint Lucia builds for the next generation.

Disclaimer: This series summarizes publicly stated proposals. Check official manifestos for final details.

The Campaign Resumes After Jounen Kwéyòl — Time to Get Real

As the dust settles after a festive Jounen Kwéyòl weekend, the Choiseul–Saltibus campaign trail heats up once again. Yet, amid the renewed energy and mounting excitement, one thing remains crystal clear — it’s time for both candidates to bring this campaign up a notch.

While both contenders have hosted at least three townhall meetings each, all we’ve seen on their Facebook pages so far are crowd photos — colorful, smiling, cheering faces. But let’s be honest:
➡️ Crowd sizes don’t win elections.
➡️ Ideas, policies, and leadership do.

🎤 The People Deserve to Hear the Message

In this digital age, there is absolutely no excuse for our candidates not to stream their townhall meetings live. Both have active Facebook pages and campaign teams capable of going live at the click of a button. So why the silence? Why keep the real message from the people?

Voters deserve more than filtered posts and edited clips. They deserve to hear, in real time, what each candidate truly stands for — their vision for Choiseul and Saltibus, their plans for youth, jobs, infrastructure, and development.

🍾 And About That Victoria Scene…

Even as the campaign resumes, the weekend wasn’t without controversy.
At an event in Victoria, a seemingly inebriated Richard Frederick made yet another round of political outbursts, spewing his usual diatribe that has become all too familiar. Choiseul deserves better discourse — grounded in respect, substance, and the issues that matter most to our people.

🔴 Upcoming: Kiffo’s Official Launch

As the momentum shifts, all eyes turn to Sunday, November 2, when Keithson “Kiffo” Charles will officially launch his campaign. Choiseul on the Move will be there — independent, fearless, and committed to the truth.

We’ll record his maiden speech, analyze the substance behind his message, and deliver an honest breakdown — free from bias, free from spin.

⚖️ A Call for Transparency

To both candidates, we say:
🎯 Let the people hear you.
🎯 Go live.
🎯 Show us not just your crowds, but your convictions.

The people of Choiseul and Saltibus are ready to listen. It’s time to turn up the volume and elevate the debate.

Choiseul on the Move
Independent. Fearless. The Truth.