New Choiseul-Saltibus SLP Executive Takes Office Following Energised AGM

A new leadership team has been elected to guide the work of the Choiseul-Saltibus Constituency Group of the Saint Lucia Labour Party.

The executive was formally presented during the group’s Annual General Meeting, held on Sunday at the La Fargue Community Center. Party members, supporters, volunteers and invited guests gathered under the theme:

“Sustaining Success Together — Through Discipline, Delivery, and Dignity.”

The constituency office described the meeting as highly successful and energised, with a strong emphasis on transparency, accountability, grassroots participation and continued engagement with residents throughout Choiseul and Saltibus.

Meet the New Executive

The newly elected Choiseul-Saltibus Constituency Group Executive comprises:

Chairman: Cyril Edward
Deputy Chairman: Wayne Charlie
Secretary: Esteher Theophane
Assistant Secretary: Vincent Peter
Treasurer: Shernika Francis
Assistant Treasurer: Kevan Modeste
Public Relations Officer: Leo St. Croix
Mobilisation Officer: Canis Richardson
Women’s Officer: Daria Jn. Baptiste
Youth Officer: Chris Pamphile
Trustees: Wayne Winifred, Tyra Philip and Gregory Charles

The executive will be responsible for strengthening the organisation of the constituency group, coordinating community outreach, encouraging greater participation among women and young people, supporting local mobilisation and maintaining communication between residents, party officials and the Parliamentary Representative.

Electing an executive is an important organisational step, but the true measure of its success will be seen in the work that follows.

Residents will expect the group to remain visible, accessible and active throughout the year—not only when an election is approaching. Issues such as water, roads, agriculture, employment, youth development, education, sports, community facilities and social support continue to affect families across the constituency and require ongoing attention.

Parliamentary Representative Presents Progress Report

During the meeting, Parliamentary Representative for Choiseul-Saltibus and Minister for Physical Development and Public Utilities, Hon. Keithson “Kiffo” Charles, presented a report on his first eight months in office.

According to the constituency office, the presentation highlighted progress in areas such as local infrastructure, community development and social assistance.

Hon. Charles reminded those present that, during the election campaign, he had promised not to become a representative who met with constituents only when another election was near.

“During the campaign, I promised that I would not be a representative who only holds meetings when an election is around the corner,” he stated.

He said the development of Choiseul-Saltibus would remain a priority and that his approach to representation would continue to be guided by discipline, delivery, dignity, transparency and accountability.

Regular reporting to constituents is a positive practice and should be encouraged. However, progress reports are most meaningful when they include clear information, realistic timelines and opportunities for residents to ask questions about completed projects, ongoing work and unresolved concerns.

Support from Government and Party Officials

The AGM was also addressed by Acting Prime Minister and Minister for Infrastructure, Hon. Shawn Edward.

In his remarks, Hon. Edward praised the history and contribution of the Choiseul constituency and expressed confidence in the representation being provided by Hon. Charles.

He described the Parliamentary Representative as grounded, hard-working and committed, noting that he regularly travels throughout the constituency to remain connected to the concerns of residents.

“He drives through every nook and cranny of this constituency, ensuring that he feels the pulse of his people, so that when he comes to Cabinet, he advocates fiercely on your behalf,” Hon. Edward told the gathering.

Other speakers included Hon. Moses Jn Baptiste, Hon. Alva Baptiste, Hon. Emma Hippolyte, Hon. Danny Butcher and SLP General Secretary Leo Clarke.

Their presence signalled strong support from senior party and government officials for the newly elected executive and the wider work of the constituency group.

Appreciation for the Outgoing Executive

The Parliamentary Representative and the Choiseul-Saltibus Constituency Group also expressed appreciation to the outgoing executive for its service.

Political and community organisations often depend heavily on volunteers who give their time, energy and resources without receiving much public recognition. It was therefore fitting that the outgoing members were thanked for the role they played in maintaining the organisation and supporting its activities.

The incoming executive now has the responsibility of building on that foundation while bringing its own ideas, energy and leadership to the task.

Leadership Must Remain People-Centred

Choiseul on the Move congratulates every member of the newly elected executive and wishes the team a productive term in office.

Leadership, however, must go beyond titles, photographs and public ceremonies.

A constituency executive should help create meaningful channels through which residents can raise concerns, receive information and take part in discussions affecting their communities. It should also be willing to listen respectfully to people who may not support the governing party.

The development of Choiseul-Saltibus is bigger than any one political organisation. Every resident—regardless of party colour, community, age or social standing—deserves fair representation and access to opportunities.

The new executive should therefore promote inclusion, respectful dialogue and consistent engagement across the entire constituency.

Particular attention should be given to the involvement of women and young people. The positions of Youth Officer and Women’s Officer should become active platforms through which programmes, ideas and opportunities are developed—not simply names appearing on an executive list.

The Public Relations Officer also has an important responsibility to ensure that residents receive timely, accurate and easy-to-understand information about meetings, projects, consultations and community initiatives.

A New Chapter Begins

The presentation of the new executive marks the beginning of another chapter for the Choiseul-Saltibus SLP Constituency Group.

The enthusiasm displayed at the AGM must now be transformed into practical action, regular communication and meaningful community engagement.

Residents will be watching to see how the new team supports the Parliamentary Representative, responds to local concerns and contributes to the wider development of Choiseul and Saltibus.

Congratulations to Chairman Cyril Edward and every member of the newly elected executive. May your term be defined by service, accountability, unity and genuine respect for the people you have been chosen to represent.

This article was prepared using information contained in a press release issued by the Choiseul-Saltibus SLP Constituency Office. Choiseul on the Move remains committed to highlighting matters of community interest while maintaining its independent editorial voice.

 

IS THIS HOW A PRIME MINISTER LEADS A COUNTRY?

Silence may protect an investigation, but it does not automatically protect public confidence.

Prime Minister Philip J. Pierre has made his position clear: he will make no public statement on the controversy involving Housing Minister Richard Frederick until the police have completed their investigation.

“No amount of slander, no amount of talk shows, no amount of memes, and no amount of Facebook postings will make me make any statements in public about Richard Frederick.”

Let us be fair. A Prime Minister should not interfere with an active police investigation. He should not pronounce a minister guilty before the evidence is examined, and he should not make comments that could prejudice any possible legal proceedings.

On that narrow point, the Prime Minister is correct.

But that is not the entire issue

The people of Saint Lucia are not necessarily asking Philip J. Pierre to reveal police evidence, interfere with investigators or declare Richard Frederick guilty.

Citizens are asking the Prime Minister to demonstrate leadership, explain the standards of his administration and reassure the country that ministerial accountability still matters.

The public has legitimate questions:

• Is Minister Frederick still exercising his full ministerial authority?
• Why were aspects of his portfolio reportedly placed under other ministers?
• Has he stepped aside, been asked to take leave or been temporarily relieved of responsibilities?
• What ethical standard applies when a serving minister becomes the subject of a serious police investigation?
• How is the government protecting public confidence while the investigation continues?

None of those questions requires the Prime Minister to discuss evidence or direct the police. They are questions about governance.

A dismissive tone does not inspire confidence

The Prime Minister’s reference to talk shows, memes, Facebook posts and alleged slander may satisfy his strongest political supporters, but it risks sounding dismissive of the wider public.

Not every citizen asking questions is spreading propaganda. Not every journalist seeking answers is attacking the government. Not every Facebook post is slander.

Some people are genuinely concerned about the integrity of Cabinet, the reputation of the country and the standards expected of those who hold high public office.

A Prime Minister does not only lead his Cabinet. He leads an entire country, including citizens who disagree with him.

Due process and accountability can exist together

Richard Frederick is entitled to due process. Being questioned or investigated does not automatically make a person guilty.

However, ministerial responsibility is not determined only by whether someone has been charged or convicted. Public office also involves trust, judgment, ethical standards and the appearance of integrity.

In many parliamentary democracies, a minister may temporarily step aside while a serious matter is investigated—not necessarily as an admission of guilt, but to protect the office, the Cabinet and the investigation itself.

That does not mean Richard Frederick must be condemned without evidence. It means the government should clearly explain how it is balancing his rights with the public’s right to accountable leadership.

The Prime Minister could have done better

A more statesmanlike response could have been:

“The police investigation must proceed independently, without political interference. Minister Frederick is entitled to due process, and no conclusion should be reached prematurely. At the same time, I understand the public’s concern. My government remains committed to accountability, and when the investigation reaches the appropriate stage, I will act decisively in the best interests of Saint Lucia.”

Such a statement would not compromise an investigation. It would acknowledge the public, defend the rule of law and demonstrate that the Prime Minister understands the seriousness of the moment.

Our honest conclusion

Prime Minister Pierre is right not to prejudge the police investigation. But he is wrong if he believes that refusing to discuss evidence also excuses him from addressing questions of ministerial accountability.

Leadership is not demonstrated merely by saying, “I will not comment.” Leadership is demonstrated by calmly explaining the government’s position, respecting public concerns, setting clear standards and assuring citizens that no individual is bigger than the office he holds.

The investigation belongs to the police.
The responsibility for the Cabinet belongs to the Prime Minister.

The people are not demanding a conviction from the Prime Minister. They are demanding leadership, transparency and reassurance.

Silence may be legally convenient, but politically and morally, it cannot be the government’s only answer.

---

Choiseul on the Move
Independent commentary. Community awareness. National accountability.

 

CHOISEUL ON THE MOVE

Book Bursary Distribution Set for District 7 – A Welcome Boost for Choiseul & Saltibus Families

There is encouraging news for parents and guardians across Choiseul and Saltibus as the Government of Saint Lucia continues its Book Bursary Programme, an initiative designed to ease the financial burden associated with preparing children for the new school year.

According to the official 2026 Book Bursary Distribution Schedule, District 7, which serves the schools of Choiseul and Saltibus, will have its distribution on:

📅 Wednesday, July 29 and Thursday, July 30, 2026
🕘 Time: 9:00 a.m. – 2:00 p.m.
📍 Venue: Choiseul Secondary School

Parents and guardians are reminded to return all previously issued textbooks so that new books for the upcoming academic year can be issued without delay.

This programme deserves commendation. At a time when many families continue to grapple with the rising cost of living, the provision of textbooks through the Book Bursary Programme helps ensure that every child has access to the learning resources they need without placing additional financial pressure on parents.

Choiseul on the Move extends congratulations to the Government of Saint Lucia and the Ministry of Education for maintaining this important initiative. Investing in our children's education is an investment in the future of our communities and our nation.

To all parents and guardians in District 7, please make every effort to attend on the scheduled dates and ensure that all previously issued books are returned. Together, we can help make the start of the new school year a smooth and successful one for our children.

Education remains one of the greatest investments we can make—let's give every child the opportunity to succeed.

#ChoiseulOnTheMove #District7 #Choiseul #Saltibus #EducationFirst #BookBursaryProgramme #SupportingFamilies #BackToSchool2026 #SaintLucia

Choiseul on the Move

Richard Frederick on Leave:

Routine Government Business or a Political Pause?

The procedure may be normal—but in politics, timing matters.

The Office of the Prime Minister has announced that Minister for Housing and Local Government, Richard Frederick, has proceeded on annual vacation leave and is expected to resume his duties on 27 August 2026.

During his absence, his ministerial responsibilities will be divided between two Cabinet colleagues. Shawn Edward will oversee Housing and Urban Renewal, while Stephenson King will assume responsibility for Local Government.

Is this normal under the Westminster system?

Yes. When a minister is absent because of annual leave, illness, overseas travel or another temporary circumstance, the Prime Minister may assign that minister’s duties to one or more Cabinet colleagues. Government business must continue, and there is nothing constitutionally unusual about dividing a portfolio temporarily.

But Let Us Speak Honestly

The reassignment of the portfolio is not the part attracting public suspicion. The questions arise because of the timing.

Minister Frederick is at the centre of an ongoing political controversy that has generated considerable public discussion. His departure on annual leave, while his responsibilities are handed to two senior colleagues, naturally causes citizens to ask whether this is merely a scheduled vacation—or a carefully managed political pause.

There is presently no public evidence proving that the leave is connected to the controversy. But it would be unrealistic to expect the public not to question the coincidence.

Governments do not operate in a political vacuum. Public confidence depends not only on whether procedures are technically lawful, but also on whether decisions appear transparent, credible and properly explained.

A government statement describing the arrangement as normal administrative practice may satisfy the constitutional question. It does not necessarily settle the political one.

What Is the Government Trying to Achieve?

Several possibilities will be discussed by the public. The leave may be entirely routine. It may provide time for the political temperature to cool. It may allow government business to continue without the controversy dominating the minister’s departments. It may also give the administration space to assess future developments before deciding its next move.

Those are reasonable political interpretations, but they remain interpretations—not established facts.

Straight Talk

The temporary sharing of a minister’s portfolio is normal Westminster practice.

The timing of Richard Frederick’s leave is politically awkward and deserves public scrutiny.

Asking questions is not the same as declaring guilt. Citizens have a right to transparency, while the minister retains the right to due process.

The Real Test Comes on 27 August

The most important question may not be why Minister Frederick went on leave, but what happens when that leave ends.

Will he return to his full ministerial responsibilities as announced? Will the temporary portfolio arrangements be reversed? Will new information emerge before then? Or will the country be presented with another explanation?

If he resumes his duties on 27 August without any change, the Government will argue that this was ordinary annual leave. If the arrangement is extended, altered or made permanent, the public will naturally revisit this announcement with even greater suspicion.

No Rush to Judgment—But Yes to Transparency

Let the facts lead. Let due process prevail. But let no government believe that citizens should stop asking legitimate questions.

For now, Saint Lucians must watch carefully, listen critically and avoid turning speculation into fact. At the same time, the Government has a responsibility to communicate clearly enough to prevent secrecy and uncertainty from filling the information gap.

Routine government business—or a political pause? Time, and what happens after 27 August, will provide the clearest answer.

What Is Your Take?

Do you believe this is simply normal annual leave, or does the timing suggest that there may be more to the story? Share your thoughts respectfully in the comments.

Choiseul on the Move

Straight Talk. Facts First. Community Always.

#ChoiseulOnTheMove   #RichardFrederick   #Accountability   #Transparency   #SaintLucia

 

CPEA Placements Are Over—Now Let's Ensure Every Beanefield Student Has the Support to Succeed

The release of this year's CPEA results has brought a renewed sense of hope and anticipation to families across Saint Lucia. Congratulations are extended to all students who have earned placement at secondary schools, as well as to the parents, teachers and communities whose dedication and support have contributed to their success.

However, as the initial excitement begins to settle, a pressing concern is emerging for several families in Choiseul and Saltibus.

For some parents, the question is no longer, "Which school has my child been assigned to?" Instead, the concern has become, "How will I ensure my child can attend school consistently each day?"

This challenge is particularly relevant for families whose children have been assigned to Beanefield Secondary School.

Over the past year, Choiseul on the Move highlighted the financial challenges faced by parents whose children attend Beanefield Secondary School but do not currently benefit from a government-supported transportation programme comparable to those available for some other schools.

With the completion of the latest CPEA placements, additional families may now find themselves confronting the same concern.

Education Must Be Accessible to Everyone

A secondary school placement should represent an opportunity for celebration—not the beginning of financial uncertainty.

Parents already manage significant educational expenses, including uniforms, textbooks, stationery, meals and other essential costs. The added responsibility of daily transportation expenses for one, two or even three children can create considerable financial strain on households.

No parent should have to face the possibility that transportation costs may limit their child's access to education.

A Respectful Appeal to the District Representative

As newly assigned students prepare to embark on the next stage of their educational journey, we respectfully appeal to the Parliamentary Representative for Choiseul/Saltibus to give this matter his full attention and support.

Effective leadership is demonstrated not only through commitments made, but through meaningful action on issues affecting constituents.

In collaboration with the Ministry of Education, the Ministry responsible for school transportation and other relevant stakeholders, every effort should be made to identify practical and sustainable solutions that can reduce the burden on families whose children attend Beanefield Secondary School.

An Investment in Families

This matter extends beyond transportation.

It represents an investment in education.

It represents an investment in student attendance.

It represents an investment in academic achievement.

Most importantly, it represents an investment in the children of Choiseul and Saltibus.

Whether through an expanded school transportation service, transportation assistance programmes, subsidized fares or another appropriate solution, parents deserve assurance that their concerns are being acknowledged and that meaningful steps are being taken to address them.

No Child Should Be Disadvantaged Because of Their School Assignment

Students do not determine the schools to which they are assigned.

Parents should not be placed at a disadvantage simply because their child's assigned school is not currently included within an existing transportation support programme.

Every child deserves the opportunity to travel to school safely, reliably and prepared to learn.

Every parent deserves confidence that the education system recognizes the importance of not only providing quality instruction but also ensuring students can access that instruction.

The Time to Act Is Now

The new school year is approaching quickly.

This presents an important opportunity for constructive engagement and timely action before families are faced with another year of transportation challenges.

Choiseul on the Move respectfully encourages the Parliamentary Representative, the Ministry of Education and all relevant stakeholders to collaborate in developing solutions that ensure students travelling from Choiseul and Saltibus to Beanefield Secondary School receive fair consideration when transportation support initiatives are being developed.

Our students have earned their opportunities through dedication and hard work.

Let us now ensure they have the support necessary to fully access them.

Because equality in education begins long before the first lesson of the day—it begins with ensuring every child has the ability to reach the classroom.

 

```

CHOISEUL ON THE MOVE

🎉 1,062,000 PAGEVIEWS! 🎉

A Milestone Worth Celebrating

Today, we pause to celebrate a truly remarkable achievement.

Choiseul on the Move has officially reached an incredible total of 1,062,000 pageviews!

More than one million visits to our little corner of the internet is not simply a number. It represents people reading, sharing, commenting, questioning, learning, remembering and staying connected to the issues that matter to Choiseul, Saltibus, Saint Lucia and our wider Caribbean community.

1,062,000

Total Pageviews and Still Growing!

This Achievement Belongs to You

To every reader who opened an article, shared a link, left a comment, sent a message, offered encouragement or challenged us to examine an issue more deeply, this milestone belongs to you.

Some of you have been following this blog from its early days. Others discovered us through a community story, a social issue, a celebration of local achievement, a historical feature or one of our passionate calls for fairness, accountability and development.

Wherever you joined the journey, your presence has helped Choiseul on the Move grow into a trusted platform for community voices, local stories and meaningful discussion.

More Than a Blog

Choiseul on the Move was never created merely to publish words. It was created to shine a light on our people, our villages, our challenges, our successes and the dreams we hold for the future.

Through this platform, we have celebrated students, sports personalities, musicians, farmers, community leaders and ordinary citizens doing extraordinary things.

We have raised concerns about roads, water, education, transportation, health, development and the everyday struggles affecting families.

We have remembered those who came before us, preserved pieces of our history and encouraged our people to speak up, participate and believe that Choiseul and Saltibus deserve progress.

One Million Views Means One Million Opportunities

Every pageview represents another opportunity to inform, inspire, encourage, challenge and unite our community.

Thank You, Choiseul. Thank You, Saltibus.

To our readers at home and abroad, including members of the Choiseul and Saltibus diaspora, we offer our deepest and most sincere gratitude.

Thank you for trusting us with your stories.

Thank you for supporting independent community content.

Thank you for sharing our articles across Facebook, WhatsApp and other platforms.

Thank you for reminding us that community journalism still matters.

Most importantly, thank you for helping us prove that the voice of a small community can travel far beyond its geographical boundaries.

The Journey Continues

While we proudly celebrate 1,062,000 pageviews, this is not the end of the journey. It is another beginning.

Choiseul on the Move will continue to highlight community achievements, raise important questions, promote fairness, preserve our history and speak boldly on matters affecting our people.

We will continue to celebrate what is good while courageously addressing what needs to improve.

Our commitment remains strong: to keep Choiseul moving, keep Saltibus informed and keep our community connected.

🎊 Congratulations to Our Entire Reading Community! 🎊

Together, we reached 1,062,000 pageviews. Together, we will continue moving forward.

Choiseul on the Move — Our Community, Our Stories, Our Voice.

Thank you for being part of this incredible journey.

#ChoiseulOnTheMove #OneMillionPageviews #ChoiseulSaltibus #CommunityVoice #ThankYouReaders

```

 

Choiseul on the Move

APPLAUDING LEADERSHIP THAT PUTS OUR CHILDREN FIRST

A timely Back-to-School Support Initiative that deserves recognition

There are moments in public life when politics should step aside and people should come first. This is one of those moments.

The announcement by the Choiseul–Saltibus District Representative of a Back-to-School Support Initiative for families in need is both timely and worthy of applause.

As the new school year approaches, many parents and guardians are quietly calculating the cost of school bags, notebooks, pens, pencils, geometry sets, uniforms, shoes and other essential items.

For some families, these expenses may appear manageable. For others, however, they can become a serious financial burden—especially when there is more than one child preparing to return to school.

“Every child deserves to begin the school year with the tools they need to learn, grow and succeed.”

More Than Just School Supplies

A notebook may seem like a simple item. A pencil may cost only a few dollars. But to a child who would otherwise arrive at school without the basic tools needed to participate, these supplies can mean much more.

✔ They provide confidence.

✔ They reduce embarrassment.

✔ They help children participate fully in class.

✔ They ease the pressure on struggling parents.

✔ They remind students that their community believes in them.

Every notebook placed in a child’s hand, every pen, every ruler and every school bag represents an investment in the future of Choiseul and Saltibus.

Applause Where It Is Deserved

Here at Choiseul on the Move, we believe that whenever an initiative directly benefits our people, it should be acknowledged—regardless of political affiliation.

Supporting our children is not a political victory.

It is a community victory.

It is encouraging to see the District Representative openly inviting families who need assistance to apply, while also urging residents to share the information with others who may benefit.

That request carries an important message: a stronger community is built when neighbours look out for one another.

The Future Begins in the Classroom

The future of Choiseul and Saltibus will not be determined only by roads, buildings, bridges or other physical infrastructure.

It will also be determined by the opportunities we create for our children today.

Every child who starts school prepared is one step closer to becoming tomorrow’s teacher, nurse, engineer, farmer, entrepreneur, tradesperson, police officer, community leader or public servant.

Back-to-School Support Applications

Families requiring assistance with essential school supplies are encouraged to apply.

Use the QR code or the application link included on the official flyer.

Application Deadline: Friday, July 17, 2026

Limited supplies are available. Priority consideration will be given to families with the greatest financial need.

Let Us Help the Message Reach Every Family

We encourage residents to share the official flyer widely across Choiseul and Saltibus.

Share it in community WhatsApp groups. Send it to a neighbour. Forward it to a relative. Mention it to a parent who may be facing difficulty.

Some families may be too proud or embarrassed to ask for help publicly. Others may simply be unaware that the assistance is available. A simple act of sharing could help a child begin the new school year better prepared.

Today, Choiseul on the Move applauds this initiative.

We hope it becomes one of many programmes that continue to put the welfare, education and future of our children first.

When we invest in our children,
we invest in the future of Choiseul, Saltibus and Saint Lucia.

Share this article and help ensure that no child begins the school year at a disadvantage.

#ChoiseulOnTheMove #ChoiseulSaltibus #BackToSchool #OurChildrenFirst #CommunityFirst #BetterTogether

 

Choiseul on the Move | Special Commentary

Rijock Drops Explosive Saint Lucia Money-Laundering Allegations

But where is the verifiable evidence?

Important: The claims discussed in this article are allegations published by financial-crime blogger Kenneth Rijock. They have not been proven in court, and no publicly available official documentation has yet been produced to substantiate them.

Saint Lucia has once again found itself at the centre of an extraordinary international allegation—this time involving the country’s Citizenship by Investment Programme, senior government officials, alleged drug proceeds and supposed contact with United States law-enforcement authorities.

On Monday, July 13, 2026, Kenneth Rijock’s Financial Crime Blog published an article alleging that unnamed senior Saint Lucian government officials had approached American law enforcement and offered information against Prime Minister Philip J. Pierre and leaders of the Saint Lucia Labour Party.

Rijock claimed that the information concerned an alleged money-laundering operation involving Saint Lucia’s Citizenship by Investment Programme—commonly called the CIP—and the laundering of proceeds supposedly connected to drug trafficking.

Those are extremely serious accusations. They deserve public attention—but they also demand a very high standard of proof.

Explosive allegations may raise legitimate questions, but allegations alone are not evidence—and repetition does not transform a claim into a proven fact.

What Exactly Is Rijock Alleging?

According to Rijock, unnamed Saint Lucian officials supposedly possess incriminating evidence and offered to cooperate with American authorities in exchange for protection from exposure over other alleged wrongdoing.

He also suggested that the alleged meeting or communication occurred outside Saint Lucia because those involved feared that their identities and actions might become known locally.

However, the article does not publicly identify:

• The government officials who allegedly supplied the information;
• The American law-enforcement agency supposedly contacted;
• The date and location of the alleged meeting;
• Any court case, investigation number or official correspondence;
• Any banking records, transaction documents or sworn statements;
• Any named independent witness capable of confirming the central claims.

Rijock may argue that confidentiality is necessary to protect his sources. That is understandable in investigative work. But from the public’s standpoint, it also means that his allegations cannot presently be independently tested or verified.

The Critical Distinction

There is a major difference between saying that someone has been accused of money laundering and saying that the person committed money laundering. At this stage, Rijock has published accusations—not a proven criminal case.

What Can Be Independently Verified?

What can be confirmed is that Saint Lucia is strengthening its anti-money-laundering and counter-terrorist-financing framework ahead of an upcoming international assessment.

In March 2026, the Government of Saint Lucia reported that the Attorney General’s Chambers, in collaboration with the Caribbean Financial Action Task Force, conducted a sensitisation workshop involving agencies such as the police, Customs and Excise, the Financial Intelligence Authority, the Inland Revenue Department and the Financial Services Regulatory Authority.

Government officials stated that Saint Lucia is expected to undergo its fifth-round mutual evaluation in 2028. That process will assess not merely whether laws and policies exist, but whether the country is effectively investigating financial crimes, prosecuting offenders and maintaining reliable financial and beneficial-ownership information.

This is important context. However, Saint Lucia preparing for an anti-money-laundering evaluation does not prove Rijock’s allegations against any particular politician or political party.

Who Is Kenneth Rijock?

Kenneth Rijock is known within anti-money-laundering circles as a former Miami lawyer and former money launderer who later worked as a financial-crime consultant and adviser.

His background may give him knowledge of how international money-laundering networks operate. But experience, reputation or claimed access to confidential sources does not automatically prove every accusation published on a blog.

Rijock must be judged by the evidence supporting each individual claim—not simply by his biography.

Questions That Demand Answers

Rather than choosing between blind acceptance and automatic dismissal, Saint Lucians should demand clear answers from all sides.

1. Has any United States agency opened an investigation involving Saint Lucia’s Citizenship by Investment Programme?
2. Have any Saint Lucian government officials contacted American authorities or entered into cooperation, immunity or protection arrangements?
3. Has the Government, the Citizenship by Investment Unit or any political official received a request for documents or information from foreign investigators?
4. Can Rijock provide redacted correspondence, dates, case references or other material that can be independently authenticated?
5. Will the Prime Minister, the responsible CIP authorities or the Saint Lucia Labour Party issue a direct and detailed response?
6. Will the opposition treat the article responsibly, or repeat unverified accusations as though they were already proven?

Accountability Must Work Both Ways

The Government should not assume that silence will make an allegation of this magnitude disappear. A clear public response would help citizens determine whether there is any substance to the story.

At the same time, Rijock and anyone circulating his article must accept that the burden of proof rests with the accuser.

It is not enough to refer vaguely to insiders, American law enforcement and incriminating evidence. When the reputation of a prime minister, a political party and an entire country is placed at risk, the public deserves more than anonymous assertions.

Likewise, political opponents should resist the temptation to convert an unverified blog report into a verdict of guilt. Responsible opposition requires scrutiny, not sensationalism.

Our Position

Choiseul on the Move will not dismiss Rijock’s report merely because it is politically uncomfortable. Neither will we present his allegations as proven facts merely because they are dramatic.

The responsible position is straightforward:

Investigate the allegation. Demand the evidence. Give those accused an opportunity to respond. Follow the facts wherever they lead.

If Rijock possesses credible evidence, it should eventually emerge through official requests, court filings, indictments, sanctions, sworn testimony or authenticated documentation.

If no supporting evidence emerges, the public must also be prepared to question whether Saint Lucia’s name and the reputations of its leaders are being unfairly damaged through speculation.

Saint Lucia Deserves the Truth

Citizenship by Investment is not an ordinary government programme. It involves the sale of citizenship, international movement, large financial transactions, national security and Saint Lucia’s global reputation.

Any credible allegation of corruption or money laundering connected to that programme must therefore be treated seriously and investigated independently.

But seriousness must never be confused with gullibility.

Saint Lucians deserve neither political cover-ups nor trial by social media. We deserve evidence, accountability, transparency and due process.

Until verifiable evidence is placed before the public, Kenneth Rijock’s article must be described accurately: it is an explosive allegation—not an established finding of criminal guilt.

What do you think?

Should the Government issue a full response, and should Kenneth Rijock be required to provide more verifiable evidence?

Share your views respectfully. Let facts—not party colours—guide the discussion.

Sources and further reading:

Kenneth Rijock’s Financial Crime Blog — July 13, 2026 article

Government of Saint Lucia — Strengthening the AML framework ahead of fifth-round evaluation

ACAMS — Background profile on Kenneth Rijock

Published by Choiseul on the Move | Commentary and public-interest analysis

 

THE WORLD CUP REFEREE:

The Most Important Man Nobody Came to Watch

Every four years, billions of eyes turn to the FIFA World Cup.

Here in Choiseul and Saltibus, families gather around television screens, friends crowd together to watch the big matches, and passionate arguments erupt over every goal, every tackle and, of course, every decision made by the referee.

But have you ever stopped to wonder what the referee in the World Cup Final actually earns?

Many football fans would be surprised to learn that while the winning country’s football federation can collect tens of millions of dollars in prize money, and individual players may earn hundreds of thousands in bonuses, the referee entrusted with controlling the biggest match in world football receives only a small fraction of that amount.

Think about the pressure resting on that whistle.

The referee cannot hide on the substitutes’ bench.

He cannot ask another official to take his place because he is having a bad afternoon.

One incorrect decision can change football history, hand one country the trophy and send another nation home in tears.

Every whistle is questioned. Every penalty decision is replayed from ten different angles. Every yellow card, red card and offside call becomes the subject of worldwide debate.

Yet, despite carrying that enormous responsibility, the referee will never be the main star of the show.

Why Are the Players Paid So Much More?

The answer is simple: football is not only a sport. It is also a massive global entertainment business.

Supporters buy jerseys carrying the names of famous players. Television stations pay enormous sums for broadcasting rights because viewers want to watch the world’s greatest footballers. Sponsors invest millions because those players attract attention, sell products and create excitement.

The referee is essential—but he is not the reason the audience showed up.

Nobody normally buys a World Cup ticket because of the referee. Very few children ask their parents for a referee’s jersey. The cameras follow the goalscorers, the captains and the superstars.

The official protects the match, but the players create the attraction.

A Powerful Lesson Beyond Football

There is a much bigger lesson hidden inside this World Cup comparison.

Pay often follows demand more closely than effort.

The hardest-working person is not always the highest-paid person. The person carrying the greatest responsibility does not always receive the biggest reward.

In music, the session musician may play perfectly while the famous singer earns the royalties. In publishing, a ghostwriter may do much of the writing while the celebrity author receives the recognition. In business, the people doing the quiet background work may be essential but remain largely unseen.

The same pattern exists in football.

The referee may run several miles during the match, maintain concentration for the entire game, manage emotional players and make decisions under intense pressure. Yet the money flows mainly towards the people the audience came to see.

The Human Being Behind the Whistle

World Cup referees do not simply arrive one morning, collect a whistle and walk onto the field.

They spend years officiating domestic matches, passing fitness tests, attending seminars and being assessed at international tournaments. Thousands of qualified officials begin that journey, but only a small number are eventually selected for the World Cup.

They also make sacrifices that rarely appear in the headlines:

long periods away from family, constant travel, demanding physical preparation and the knowledge that one mistake could overshadow years of excellent work.

Some officials will spend an entire career hoping for the opportunity to referee at a World Cup. Even fewer will ever be considered for the final.

For them, the medal, the appointment and the place in football history may carry greater meaning than the cheque.

A Message for Choiseul and Saltibus Fans

We in Choiseul and Saltibus love football deeply. We celebrate goals loudly, defend our favourite teams passionately and sometimes blame the referee when the result does not go our way.

But perhaps the next time we are tempted to condemn an official after one controversial decision, we should pause and remember the enormous burden he carries.

Without the referee, there is no kickoff.

Without the whistle, there is no control.

Without fair enforcement of the Laws of the Game, there is no legitimate champion.

The players may receive the fame, the endorsements and the biggest bonuses. But the referee carries something else: the responsibility of protecting the integrity of the match.

He may leave the stadium without the trophy, without millions of supporters chanting his name and without a jersey-selling empire behind him.

But if he has officiated the World Cup Final fairly and successfully, he walks away with a place in the history of the world’s greatest sporting event.

The Big Question

```

If you had the choice, would you rather be a player collecting a massive World Cup bonus—or the referee trusted to control the biggest match on Earth?

```

Share your opinion in the comments.

Choiseul on the Move
Where Community Meets Conversation.

 

WATER IS LIFE? THEN WHY IS ROBLOT BEING LEFT TO GO DRY?

There comes a point when silence is no longer patience—it becomes surrender.

The people of Roblot and the surrounding communities have reached that point.

For months we have been hearing about improvements to water supply across Saint Lucia. We have listened to speeches. We have watched official announcements. We have seen photographs of ceremonies and promises of better days.

But here in Roblot, one simple question remains:

Where is the water?

To the best of my recollection, the potable water situation in Roblot has never been this bad.

There was a time when we could at least depend on a Wednesday and Sunday supply. It wasn't perfect, but we knew water would arrive, often for several hours and sometimes for most of Sunday.

Today, that has become a distant memory.

For the past six months, the situation has deteriorated to the point where many households receive water only once a week—if they are fortunate. And when it does come, the supply may last no more than 90 minutes, sometimes even less.

How is any family expected to survive under those conditions?

I have four water tanks with a combined storage capacity of approximately 3,200 gallons. Today, every single one of them is empty—not because I failed to prepare, but because there simply has not been enough water flowing through the pipes to fill them.

That is the reality behind the official statements.

Naturally, people are beginning to ask difficult questions.

Has WASCO deliberately reduced the supply to Roblot and neighbouring communities?

If so, why?

Is this the result of technical limitations, poor management, or political convenience?

The public deserves honest answers—not rumours and speculation.

What makes the situation even more painful is that Choiseul residents continue to pay increasing water bills whenever water is available. At the same time, taxpayers contribute toward major national water infrastructure, including the redevelopment of the John Compton Dam, from which many residents here feel they receive little direct benefit.

People are not asking for special treatment.

They are asking for fairness.

They are asking for reliable access to one of life's most basic necessities.

During the recent Budget debate, our parliamentary representative reminded the nation that "water is life."

He was absolutely correct.

But if water truly is life, then what are we to conclude about Roblot and its neighbouring communities?

Because if the amount of water reaching us is any measure of how much our lives matter, we would all be dead by now.

That may sound sarcastic, but it reflects the depth of frustration felt by ordinary families who have been carrying buckets, rationing every gallon, postponing laundry, struggling to cook, and worrying whether there will be enough water for children, the elderly and the sick.

No amount of ribbon-cutting.

No amount of social media photographs.

No amount of carefully crafted speeches.

No amount of political spin...

...can make water flow through dry pipes.

Representation is measured by results—not publicity.

The people of Roblot do not need another promise.

They need water.

They need WASCO to explain what has gone wrong.

They need a clear timetable for restoring a reliable supply.

And they need their elected representative to advocate as passionately for this community's right to water as he speaks about water being life.

Because in 2026, no community in Saint Lucia should be reduced to wondering whether the tap will run for an hour this week.

Water is not a luxury.

It is not a political favour.

It is not something communities should have to beg for.

It is a basic human necessity.

The people of Roblot have waited long enough.

Now they deserve answers—and more importantly, they deserve water.

 

Are Choiseulians and Saltibusians in Positions of Influence Treating Their Fellow Constituents Fairly?

A sermon delivered on Sunday by Fr. Albert Aaron Smith has sparked a conversation that deserves to reach far beyond the walls of the church.

His message was simple but piercing: too many people who profess Christian values are treating those under their authority unfairly. According to Fr. Albert, there are individuals in influential positions who attend church faithfully, yet their employees and those who depend on them experience disrespect, intimidation, and unfair treatment.

Whether one is Catholic, another Christian denomination, or of a different faith altogether, the message speaks to a universal principle: leadership without compassion is a failure of leadership.

That brings us to a question every resident of Choiseul and Saltibus should quietly ask:

Are Choiseulians and Saltibusians who occupy positions of influence treating their fellow constituents fairly?

Across our constituency, many of our sons and daughters have worked hard to become teachers, principals, nurses, police officers, managers, supervisors, public servants, business owners, board members, and leaders in various organizations. Their success is something we should celebrate because it shows what our people are capable of achieving.

But success also comes with responsibility.

A position should never become a licence to belittle others. Authority should never be used to humiliate, intimidate, victimise, or deny deserving people opportunities because of personal differences, politics, family connections, or favouritism.

Too often we hear quiet stories that never reach the public.

Stories of employees afraid to speak.

Stories of qualified people being overlooked.

Stories of constituents feeling that they have no voice because someone "important" holds the power.

Many suffer in silence because they fear losing a job, a contract, or an opportunity.

If even a fraction of these stories is true, then we have a serious conversation to have—not about politics, but about character.

A truly successful Choiseul is not measured only by new buildings, roads, or community projects. It is measured by how we treat each other.

The mark of a great leader is not how many people salute them.

It is how the cleaner is treated.

How the security guard is respected.

How the junior employee is encouraged.

How the struggling constituent is listened to.

How decisions are made fairly, transparently, and without prejudice.

Every one of us who occupies a position of influence—whether in government, the private sector, schools, churches, statutory bodies, or community organisations—should occasionally ask ourselves a difficult question:

Would the people who work with me describe me as fair, respectful, and compassionate?

If the answer is no, then perhaps it is time for reflection.

Choiseul and Saltibus have always been known as communities where neighbours looked after neighbours and where respect formed the foundation of village life. Those values should not disappear simply because someone receives a title, an office, or authority over others.

Leadership is a privilege.

Power is temporary.

Character is permanent.

As Fr. Albert reminded his congregation, our faith—or indeed our values—mean very little if they are not reflected in the way we treat people every single day.

Perhaps the greatest legacy any leader from Choiseul or Saltibus can leave is not a title or a position, but a reputation that says:

"I treated people with dignity, fairness, and respect."

That is the kind of leadership our constituency deserves.

 

USA DESERVED TO LOSE AGAINST BELGIUM

There are moments in sport when the final score tells only part of the story.

The United States' heavy 4-1 defeat to Belgium may have ended their FIFA World Cup dream, but for many football lovers around the globe, justice had already taken the field long before the opening whistle.

This was never about America.

This was never about Belgium.

This was about protecting the integrity of football.

The controversy surrounding the reversal of Folarin Balogun's suspension left millions asking one uncomfortable question:

Can the rules of football be bent when powerful people make phone calls?

President Donald Trump openly admitted that he contacted FIFA President Gianni Infantino to seek a review of Balogun's red-card suspension. Shortly afterward, FIFA's judicial process overturned the suspension, allowing the American striker to play against Belgium. FIFA insists the decision was made independently and according to its regulations. Yet across the football world, the optics were disastrous, with Belgium, commentators and supporters questioning whether politics had crept into a game that should belong only to the players.

Whether the decision was legally permissible is one matter.

Whether it strengthened public confidence in football is another.

Sport survives because of one simple belief: the same rules apply to everyone.

If ordinary nations believe that influence can accomplish what appeals cannot, then football loses something far more valuable than a match.

It loses trust.

Here in Saint Lucia, and especially here in Choiseul and Saltibus, we spend countless hours teaching our young footballers about discipline, respect for referees, accepting difficult decisions and playing by the rules.

What lesson do they learn when they see the world's biggest football tournament engulfed in accusations that political influence helped rewrite a disciplinary decision?

Do we tell them that talent and hard work are enough?

Or do we unintentionally teach them that power speaks louder than the rule book?

Football has always been bigger than presidents, politicians and celebrities.

A referee's whistle must carry more weight than a politician's telephone.

The laws of the game must never depend on who has access to the FIFA President.

Belgium ultimately answered the controversy in the best possible way.

Not with press conferences.

Not with political statements.

Not with complaints.

They answered on the pitch.

Four goals.

One unforgettable statement.

Football settled the argument where it should always be settled—between the white lines.

If there is one positive to emerge from this controversy, it is that the beautiful game reminded the world that influence cannot score goals.

Power cannot defend against superior football.

Politics cannot substitute for ninety minutes of excellence.

For FIFA, however, serious questions remain.

The governing body now carries the burden of convincing the football world that justice is blind, impartial and immune from outside influence.

Because once supporters begin believing that rules can change depending on who is asking, the credibility of every future decision comes under suspicion.

As we continue developing young footballers here in Choiseul, let us teach them the lesson this episode ultimately delivered.

Win fairly.

Lose honourably.

Respect the referee.

Respect the game.

And remember that football belongs to the players—not to politicians.

Belgium won the match.

Football won the lesson.

May FIFA ensure that the integrity of the game wins every time.