Mixed Signals and Political Mischief: A Word to Darrion Louis

Mr. Darrion Louis, let’s be clear.

Your recent Facebook post—cloaked in poetic ambiguity—raises more red flags than inspiration. While you claim the “dream remains,” your motives seem muddled, and your message dangerously borders on sowing seeds of division just when your party should be focused on unity and clarity.

You wrote:

"On to you Mr. Keithson Kiffo Charles and Mr. Philip J. Pierre..."

"Seven years later the yearning is unchanged...Who among you will commit to making that vision real?"

Excuse us, sir, but are you campaigning... or grandstanding?

You were part of the SLP candidate vetting process and you knew what signing up meant. You put your name in the hat, and the party chose someone else—Keithson “Kiffo” Charles. That’s democracy. That’s internal party discipline. That’s how political machinery works.

So why now, are you acting like an independent critic or a shadow candidate?

Disguised Undermining?

This part of your post is especially telling:

"I remain convinced that I-3 is the decisive box in the coming election."
"Which candidate will convincingly deliver this dream and persuade our YOUNG PEOPLE to vote?"

This reads like a subtle jab. A passive-aggressive challenge to Kiffo’s leadership and the Prime Minister’s influence. If you truly believe in the SLP and the cause you once pursued under its banner, this is not the time to play armchair quarterback.

This is not a neutral reflection. This is political sabotage in soft-focus. And the people of I-3 are not blind.

If You're Out, Then Step Back. Or Be Honest About Stepping Forward Again.

If you intend to support the party and help the candidate the people didn’t reject—but the party selected—then rally behind Kiffo with strength and solidarity. If not, come out boldly and state your intentions.

This in-between stance—neither supportive nor oppositional, neither candidate nor comrade—is confusing at best and misleading at worst.

The community is watching. They want clarity, not cryptic riddles. They want leadership, not lingering bitterness. And most of all, they want you to choose a lane.

Final Thought

You said, “The dream remains though the players may shift.”

Yes, players shift—and true team players accept that shift with grace and support the new lineup. If you're not playing anymore, don’t heckle from the sidelines.

I-3 will decide nothing if it’s torn by ego and entitlement.

Respect the process. Respect the people. And if your dream is real—don’t weaponize it against your own team.

Let’s not confuse ambition with disruption.

🩺💰 UWP’s $75K Health Insurance and Levy Removal: A Bold Promise That Hits Home

Imagine this.

Your mom slips and breaks a hip. Surgery is needed. The cost? $22,000. And the worst part? You have no coverage. You panic. Your bank account isn't prepared, and you’re stuck choosing between her health and your rent.

Now imagine this: You call a hotline, give your NIC number, and the hospital tells you, “You’re covered. Up to $75,000 annually. No levy. No red tape. Just care.”

That’s the kind of vision the United Workers Party (UWP) is painting as they prepare to hit the campaign trail. And whether you bleed yellow, red, or none at all, this promise is raising eyebrows—and hopes.

🟡 The Offer on the Table

Let’s break it down. UWP’s platform includes:

✅ Eliminating the 2.5% Health & Security Levy—a tax that many argue burdens workers and businesses alike.
✅ Introducing a National Health Insurance Scheme offering every Saint Lucian up to EC $75,000 in annual medical coverage.

This is part of their wider SOS-7 (Save Our Saint Lucia) agenda—a campaign that touches on issues like fuel prices, crime, and education. But this healthcare promise? It’s the real scene-stealer.

💡 Why This Is Catching Fire With the Public

1. It Hits the Pocket, Where It Hurts Most

Let’s be honest. The 2.5% levy may sound small, but when every dollar counts, getting rid of it is a clear, feel-good move. It says:

“We trust you to manage your money better than the government does.”

Couple that with free health insurance? That’s putting money back in people’s pockets and offering a safety net at the same time. It’s smart politics—and practical too.

2. Health Is Personal

This isn’t about abstract GDP figures or national debt. It’s about you, your child, your parents, and the peace of mind that you won’t go broke just because you get sick.

At EC $75,000 per person, this isn’t just a symbolic gesture. It’s a lifeline, especially for working-class and middle-income families who can’t afford private insurance and are frustrated with under-equipped public health services.

3. A Sharp Contrast with the Status Quo

UWP isn’t just making promises—they’re positioning themselves as the alternative to disappointment.
They argue that over $60 million has been collected from the current levy... but where are the results? Crowded hospitals. Shortages in medication. Patients lying on stretchers.

By proposing to remove the tax AND still give more, they draw a powerful contrast—and dare the electorate to believe again.

4. Clear, Catchy, and Campaign-Ready

Politically speaking, it’s brilliant.

• “We’ll scrap the levy.”
• “You’ll get $75K in coverage.”

It’s simple, memorable, and looks great on a billboard. In an election season where clarity sells, this is prime material.

😐 But… Is It Too Good to Be True?

Let’s be balanced. Promises are sweet, but delivery is everything. So voters are right to ask:

🛠️ How will it be funded? Removing a levy means losing a revenue stream. Can the economy afford that and health insurance?
📋 What will the system look like? Will it be universal? Will private doctors be included? How fast will claims be processed?
🤔 Can we trust this to be more than just campaign talk? Saint Lucians have been burned before.

These are real concerns. And any party proposing major reforms must show how they’ll deliver, not just what they’re offering.

🗳️ Final Thoughts: Sweet Words or Game-Changer?

Whatever your political leaning, you have to admit—it’s a bold promise. And boldness sells in elections.

This isn’t just about votes. It’s about hope. It’s about daring to imagine a Saint Lucia where health care doesn’t send us to the poorhouse, and where taxes serve people—not drain them.

Whether the UWP can actually pull it off is a question for policy analysts, economists, and the ballot box. But one thing is clear:

This is the kind of promise that gets people talking, thinking… and voting.

🔁 What do you think?
Would you support this healthcare plan? Do you believe it’s achievable—or just another fairy tale? Drop your thoughts in the comments or message us on Facebook.

Let’s talk about it. Because your health isn’t a luxury—it’s a right. 💛🇱🇨

A CALL TO BOTH CANDIDATES IN CHOISEUL/SALTIBUS 🌟

Leadership begins long before the votes are counted.

As the general election draws near, we call on both candidates vying to represent the people of Choiseul/Saltibus to rise above the noise and lead with dignity, fairness, and purpose.

🗳️ This election is more than a competition—it’s a test of character, a measure of your respect for the people, and an opportunity to uplift our democracy.

Let this campaign be a reflection of the best in you—and in us as a community.

✅ Speak truthfully. Don’t twist facts or spread lies to score points.
✅ Focus on solutions, not slander. Choiseul/Saltibus deserves ideas, not insults.
✅ Respect every voter—young or old, red or yellow, friend or critic.
✅ Inspire, don’t incite. Your supporters will mirror your tone—lead them wisely.
✅ Shake hands. Not just at rallies—but in spirit. This is about service, not war.

Let’s not turn neighbours into enemies over politics. Let’s not poison the future with division and dirty tricks. Let the legacy of this election be unity, decency, and vision.

To the candidates: when you walk into homes, churches, and village squares, walk in not as saviours—but as servants. Show us why you're fit to lead—not just by your promises, but by your conduct.

🕊️ Lead with peace. Campaign with integrity. Respect the people.

Let’s make this a campaign Choiseul/Saltibus can be proud of!

#ChoiseulSaltibus #Election2025 #LeadershipWithDignity #BetterTogether #RespectTheVote

The Silent Strategy: Is the SLP Taking Voters in Castries North and Central for a Ride?

In the spirited race to the next general elections, the United Workers Party (UWP) has already placed all 17 of its candidates on the battlefield—a clear sign of readiness and strategic clarity. On the other side, the Saint Lucia Labour Party (SLP) appears to be playing a more mysterious game. While it has made several candidate changes across key constituencies—even unseating sitting MPs in some cases—it has remained noticeably silent on Castries North and Castries Central, leaving voters to question: What exactly is the Labour Party’s endgame here?

Let’s not forget: In the last election, both Stephenson King (Castries North) and Richard Frederick (Castries Central) ran as independents, defying party labels but clearly aligning with the values and direction of the SLP-led administration. After their wins, both men were welcomed into the fold of government, not as backbenchers or silent supporters, but as key ministers—King at Infrastructure, Frederick at Housing.

Yet here we are, standing at the brink of another election cycle, and neither man has been formally accepted as a Labour candidate. The SLP has delayed or outright avoided declaring them as standard bearers under their official banner. Meanwhile, constituencies like Castries East, Vieux Fort South, and Dennery South already have their candidates on the ground, knocking on doors and making their case.

So, what gives?

The Questions Voters Deserve to Ask

If both King and Frederick were deemed good enough to hold major ministerial portfolios, why the hesitation in formally endorsing them as Labour candidates?

Is the SLP afraid of internal backlash from its grassroots members who still view King and Frederick as “outsiders” or “opportunists”?

Is the party trying to ride on their personal popularity in those constituencies without officially absorbing them into the party—just in case things go south?

This approach smacks of political opportunism cloaked in silence. It’s as if the SLP wants to eat its cake and still have it—benefiting from the political capital of King and Frederick without paying the price of transparency and loyalty to the party base.

Is This Fair to the Electorate?

Absolutely not.

By failing to confirm their candidates in Castries North and Central, the Labour Party is essentially playing a waiting game, possibly to gauge public sentiment or avoid internal fractures. But in doing so, it leaves voters in limbo, unsure of who exactly is representing them or what party banner their MP will fly under once elected.

If the SLP genuinely believes in democratic values and openness, it must come clean with the electorate. Either Stephenson King and Richard Frederick are part of your team, or they’re not. You can't keep voters in the dark just to serve political convenience.

A Dangerous Precedent

The longer the SLP delays, the more it appears to be using these two constituencies as pawns, not partners in progress. It also raises the larger question: What else is the SLP hiding from the electorate? If this level of manipulation is happening at the candidate selection level, what can we expect when policy decisions roll out post-election?

Final Thought: The People Are Watching

Saint Lucians are politically aware. They may not shout in the streets every day, but they are paying attention. The silence around Castries North and Central is not just a strategy—it’s a message. And come election day, the people will have the final say.

We deserve transparency. We deserve accountability. We deserve better.

🗳️ Don’t be taken for a ride.

🗳️ Is Saint Lucia Heading for Its Lowest Voter Turnout Yet?

As whispers grow louder about the possibility of early general elections in November 2025—well ahead of the official 2026 date—there’s one question more pressing than who wins:

Will enough Saint Lucians even show up to vote?

Recent trends suggest we might be headed for one of the lowest voter turnouts in our electoral history.

📉 Voter Turnout in General Elections: A Downward Spiral

Here’s how Saint Lucia has fared over the past four election cycles:

Election Year	Voter Turnout
2006	58.46 %
2011	56.14 %
2016	53.45 %
2021	51.08 %

That’s a steady decline of over 7% in just 15 years.

Unless something drastic changes, 2025 (or 2026) could break a troubling record for the lowest turnout in our modern voting history.

🚨 Why Are Saint Lucians Staying Home?

Let’s break down the key factors driving this disengagement:

1. Disillusionment with Politics

Many voters—especially in rural districts and working-class communities—feel abandoned after elections. Community centres remain closed. Promised projects stall. Political leaders seem out of touch until it's time to campaign again.

➡️ The sentiment is clear: “Why vote if nothing changes?”

2. Young People Tuned Out

A large portion of first-time voters and millennials are disengaged. They see politics as old, elitist, and irrelevant to their realities—jobs, cost of living, housing, and education. With no real youth-centered platforms, many simply opt out.

3. Policy Fatigue and Broken Promises

From the controversial 2.5% levy implemented during economic hardship to the lack of transparency on the GPH–SLASPA port deal, trust in leadership is eroding across party lines.

4. Election Day Barriers

The 2021 elections—held during the COVID-19 pandemic—revealed practical concerns like outdated voter rolls, elderly access issues, and lack of polling station support. These barriers remain unaddressed and may further depress turnout.

🇱🇨 The Danger of Apathy

When voter turnout drops, democracy suffers.
Power consolidates in the hands of a few.
Elections become less about the will of the people and more about who can mobilize a loyal base.

A low turnout election means decisions about Saint Lucia’s future—roads, schools, healthcare, jobs—are made by less than half the population.

🗣️ What Needs to Be Done?

✔️ Launch Civic Education Campaigns
Go beyond voter registration. Teach why voting matters—especially in schools, youth centres, and churches.

✔️ Engage the Disengaged
Parties must offer real platforms, debates, and face-to-face time—not just social media memes or rum-and-food events.

✔️ Fix the System
Clean up the voter list. Make polling stations more accessible. Offer early voting and absentee options.

🔚 Final Word

Whether the election is this year or next, Saint Lucia stands at a crossroads.

This is not about red or yellow—it’s about representation, responsibility, and restoring faith in our democracy.

🗳️ Don’t let your silence become someone else’s power.
🇱🇨 Saint Lucia decides. Will YOU show up?

When Power Crosses the Line: Why Saint Lucia Must Stand With Eldrise Charles

It happened in broad daylight — not in a dark alley, not in a hidden corridor, but in full view of the Parliament of Saint Lucia.

A woman — a journalist — stood firm, doing her job, reporting from the grounds of the people’s house. And in a moment that has since been captured in a now-viral security video, she was allegedly assaulted by none other than Deputy Prime Minister and Minister for Tourism, Ernest Hilaire.

Yes. You read that correctly.
A female journalist.
An elected minister.
A country watching in silence.

But silence is no longer an option.

Abuse of Power is Still Abuse

Journalism is not a crime.
Protesting is not a threat.
But when a man in power lays hands on a woman — physically, verbally, or otherwise — it’s not “passion,” it’s not “politics,” and it’s not “misunderstanding.”
It is assault. It is abuse of power. And it must be condemned.

Reports from The Voice, UnitedPac St. Lucia, and a string of online sources have confirmed the seriousness of this allegation. The journalist, Eldrise Charles, courageously filed a report with the police. Evidence has emerged. Public support is mounting.

Yet the halls of Parliament remain eerily quiet.

Instead of leading with dignity and ensuring justice, the Speaker of the House has chosen to peddle doubt and false framing, failing in his most basic duty — to protect the sanctity of Parliament and the safety of all who enter its gates.

Where Is the Outrage?

Where are the statements from Cabinet?
Where are the apologies, the suspensions, the investigations that should have started the very next day?

This isn't about party lines — it’s about moral lines, and one has been crossed.

Women across this nation are watching.
Journalists across the region are taking note.
And Saint Lucians, whether red or yellow, should be ashamed that our democracy is being so blatantly disrespected.

We Must Take a Stand

We stand with Eldrise Charles, not just because she is a woman, or a journalist, but because what happened to her could happen to any one of us — if we let this slide.

We demand:

• ✅ An independent investigation
• ✅ A public apology
• ✅ A retraction from the Speaker of the House
• ✅ A clear message from Parliament that abuse — in any form — is unacceptable

🇱🇨 Saint Lucia, This Is a Test of Our Integrity

Every time we stay silent in the face of injustice, we chip away at the kind of country we claim to be.
Do we believe in truth?
Do we believe in freedom of the press?
Do we protect women?
Or do we only care when it’s politically convenient?

Let this moment be a turning point.
Let this moment show the world that Saint Lucia still has a backbone.
Because if we can’t defend one woman with a microphone, what hope do we have of defending democracy itself?

#StandWithEldrise
#ProtectThePress
#NoToAbuseOfPower
#SpeakerMustRetract
#SaintLuciaIsWatching

Back 2 School Family Fun Day with Hon. Bradly Felix – Let’s Go Choiseul!

It’s that time of year again—backpacks are being dusted off, notebooks are stacking up, and school bells are getting ready to ring! But before we hit the books, Hon. Bradly Felix is inviting every family in Choiseul and beyond to come out and celebrate the joy of education, community, and pure fun at this year’s Back 2 School Family Fun Day!

📅 Sunday, August 31st, 2025

🕐 From 1:00 PM onwards

📍 Choiseul Plaza Parking Lot

🚐 Transportation Available

This isn’t just any ordinary fun day. This is a high-energy, child-friendly, community-building bash that’s all about giving our young ones a joyful send-off before the school year kicks off. And trust us—you won’t want to miss what’s in store!

🎈 What’s On the Fun Menu?

Bouncing Castle – Let the kids jump out that back-to-school anxiety!

Cotton Candy & Snow Cones – Sweet treats to cool the summer heat.

Trampoline Action – Bounce to the beat and defy gravity!

Live Music – Feel the vibe and dance with your tribe.

Haircuts & Hairstyles – Get your fresh, first-day-of-school look on point!

From giggles in the bouncing castle to brand new trims for a confident school start, this event is all about the kids—and the community that uplifts them. It’s also a reminder that Choiseul is a place where families matter, where leadership listens, and where back-to-school means back to unity.

So bring your children, your neighbors, and your positive energy—because we FLEX as one!See you there, Choiseul! 💛

Kiffo for Choiseul/Saltibus: The People’s Choice, Now Official

At long last, the waiting is over. The Saint Lucia Labour Party has officially selected Keithson “Kiffo” Charles as its candidate for Choiseul/Saltibus in the upcoming general elections—constitutionally due in July 2026, but with whispers of an early call this year.

This announcement doesn’t just confirm what the grassroots already knew; it affirms that the SLP has finally aligned with the will of the people. And for that, the administration deserves thanks.

A Wise Choice Rooted in Reality

For months, there has been chatter, anxiety, and speculation. But while the pundits argued, Kiffo was walking the communities, shaking hands, listening to concerns, and quietly building a groundswell of support. His selection is not the product of backroom deals—it’s a reflection of what is happening on the ground.

The SLP leadership showed courage and wisdom in recognizing that authentic connection beats empty rhetoric. They listened to Choiseul/Saltibus, and they chose the candidate whose momentum was impossible to ignore.

Why Kiffo Stands Out

Kiffo is more than just a name on a ballot. He’s a son of the soil who understands the struggles of everyday Choiseulians. He has been present in times of joy and in times of hardship.

From championing youth engagement to advocating for consistent water supply and better infrastructure, Kiffo embodies the kind of leadership that unites rather than divides. His grassroots energy has already inspired renewed hope that Choiseul/Saltibus can take its rightful place as a thriving, developed constituency.

The Road Ahead

The battle won’t be easy. Bradley Felix is a seasoned politician. But Kiffo has what it takes to meet this moment—authenticity, humility, and a genuine passion for his people.

And whether the elections are called this year or in 2026, one thing is certain: Kiffo’s time has come. The people are ready, and now the party is, too.

Thank You to the SLP Administration

We applaud the SLP administration for making this bold and wise decision. By selecting Kiffo, they have not only chosen a candidate but also signaled their commitment to empowering authentic leaders who reflect the heartbeat of their communities.

Kiffo for Choiseul/Saltibus isn’t just a slogan; it’s a movement. It’s about a community ready to rise, a constituency ready to shine, and a candidate ready to deliver.

Did Saint Lucia Get a Good Deal, or Are We Paying Too High a Price for Modernization?

Saint Lucia’s agreement with Global Ports Holding (GPH) is being sold as a landmark for our tourism sector. But beneath the glossy headlines and ribbon-cutting ceremonies lies a hard question: Did we trade too much for too little?

What the Deal Really Is

In 2022, the government signed a 30-year concession with GPH, with the option to extend for another 10 years. Under this agreement, GPH will manage cruise operations at Port Castries, Bananes Bay, and Soufrière.

The terms:

US$135 million investment in port upgrades.

US$17 million debt settlement on behalf of SLASPA.

The ability to host mega cruise ships, which could bring more visitors.

Sounds promising—on paper.

The Price Tag Nobody Talks About

Here’s where things get controversial. Under the concession, SLASPA will receive US$1 per cruise passenger for the first seven years, increasing to US$1.50 per passenger afterward. Compare that to the US$6.50 per passenger the island used to collect.

That’s a massive drop. And when you multiply this difference across millions of cruise passengers over decades, it means Saint Lucia is giving up tens of millions of dollars in revenue. Money that could have been reinvested directly into healthcare, education, infrastructure, and jobs for locals.

Who Wins, Who Loses?

GPH Wins Big: They gain control of our most valuable cruise assets for 30–40 years, pocket the lion’s share of revenues, and expand their global footprint.

Government Wins Short Term: They clear debt, cut a ribbon on a $135 million project, and point to “progress.”

Saint Lucians May Lose Long Term: We risk becoming spectators while foreign investors control the cash flow from one of our island’s most important tourism gateways.

The Community Factor

At Bananes Bay, families are being displaced to make way for redevelopment. Promises of “fair compensation” are on the table, but history tells us locals often get the short end of the stick in such projects.

So modernization comes, yes—but it’s ordinary Saint Lucians who bear the hidden costs.

The Bottom Line

This isn’t about whether the ports should be modernized—they should. It’s about the terms of the deal. Was a US$1 per passenger rate really the best we could negotiate? Why was transparency so lacking? And how do we justify a foreign company reaping profits for four decades while our people settle for crumbs?

Modernization is not free. But the burning question is: Did Saint Lucia strike a deal for the future, or did we just sell it off too cheaply?

👉 Over to you, readers: Do you see this as a smart long-term investment, or are we setting ourselves up to pay too high a price for progress?

🔥 Saint Lucia Votes: Crime, Candidates & Why SLP Still Holds the Edge

The political temperature has surged. With caseloads of violence rising and campaign milestones unfolding, the 2026 general elections are no longer theoretical—they’re high-stakes reality.

6

Crime Surge: Yesterday’s Tragedies Shake Castries

In the busiest part of the city, two massacres rocked Castries yesterday:

Around 10 a.m., Jamie Williams (25) of Morne Du Don was gunned down at the Jeremie Street taxi stand, leaving two others wounded as panic exploded through the crowd  .

Hours later, on Micoud Street, Takim “Tako” James fell victim to another senseless daytime shooting—again sending residents and bystanders into fear  .

These daylight assassinations have dragged 2025’s homicide tally even higher—underscoring the ease with which violence is spreading, and elevating crime as the defining political issue of this election.

UWP Reveals Its Full Cast—At Last

Today, amid heightened tension, the United Workers Party officially unveiled its full slate of 17 candidates across all constituencies  . The reveal brings clarity—and scrutiny—about who might challenge the SLP in swing districts.

The Candidate Shakeup: Amped Up

SLP’s Bold Moves: Veterans like Kenny Anthony and Joachim Henry remain sidelined. In their place: Lisa Jawahir (36, Communications Director) and Danny Butcher (39, educator). Excitement—or friction—persists at the grassroots.

UWP’s Lineup: With the full roster out, attention now turns to how these fresh faces stack up against incumbents—including long-timers like Philip J. Pierre.

Why UWP Still Trails

1. Chastanet’s Image Drag: His polished persona fails to cut through anger-fueled messaging.

2. SLP’s Reach vs. UWP’s Reactive Game: Today’s violence amplifies the SLP’s advantage—state programs appear responsive, while UWP must scramble.

3. Crime, Still the Defining Battle: With 2025’s count rising fast and visible in daylight, the stakes are sky-high. UWP must pair condemnation with credible policy—or risk being overwhelmed by fear-driven loyalty.

SLP’s Steel Scaffolding (Updated)

Resource Leverage: SLP continues to deploy housing, youth, and relief programs with calculated effect.

Electoral Volatility, Not Calm Momentum: Post-1997, only the SLP has broken through with consecutive wins. One-term ousters like UWP show voter willingness to change—but currently, UWP’s messaging falls short.

Crime as Incumbent’s Curse—and Buffer: Today’s murders deepen the crisis—and unless UWP offers urgent sanity via strategy, the electorate may choose the devil they know.

Prediction: SLP Holds On, But Under Fire

SLP: Predicted 8–10 seats, weaker but still in control.

UWP: May climb to 5–7 seats, but lacking the full majority (9 needed).

Why this still holds: Citizens reeling from today’s violence may cling to familiarity—unless UWP can pace a compelling plan.

The Bottom Line

Yesterday’s shootings have ratcheted up the stakes. Crime has become the election’s central battlefield, and UWP finally has its team—but is the message ready? Unless they move fast with real plans, fear may hand SLP a second term—not by strength, but by survival instinct.

Over to you: Can UWP convert  yesterday’s urgency into actual momentum? Or will voters once again fall back on the incumbent’s machinery?

SLP’s Indecision in Choiseul/Saltibus: Why Keithson “Kiffo” Charles Deserves the Nod

The people of Choiseul/Saltibus are growing restless. With the next general election looming, the Saint Lucia Labour Party (SLP) continues to drag its feet on announcing a candidate to go up against Bradly Felix. This delay has sparked unnecessary anxiety in the constituency and risks weakening the party’s momentum in one of the island’s most hotly contested battlegrounds.

Meanwhile, on the ground, one name is rising above the noise: Keithson “Kiffo” Charles.

The SLP’s Costly Delay

The indecision at the top is more than just politics—it’s a gamble with the confidence of grassroots supporters. Voters in Choiseul/Saltibus want clarity, stability, and leadership. Instead, they’re left in limbo while whispers swirl about who might eventually get the nod. The longer the administration drags its feet, the more it looks like the party is either divided or unwilling to trust the people’s choice. Both perceptions damage the SLP’s credibility.

Kiffo’s Momentum Is Real

While others wait, Kiffo is moving. He’s visible in the constituency, engaging residents, and earning the kind of grassroots trust that cannot be manufactured at the last minute. From village corners to community events, his presence is felt. This momentum is crucial, because winning Choiseul/Saltibus will not come from lofty speeches or last-minute parachutes—it will come from consistent groundwork and genuine connection with the people.

Why Keithson Over the Rest?

1. Grassroots Appeal – Unlike some of the other names floated, Kiffo’s connection with ordinary Choiseulians is undeniable. He speaks their language and understands their struggles.

2. Momentum Already Built – Elections are about energy. Right now, Kiffo is the only SLP hopeful building it. To replace him or delay his confirmation risks squandering that head start.

3. Credibility Against Bradley – Bradley Felix is not an easy opponent. Defeating him requires a candidate who already has people rallying behind him. Kiffo has shown he can galvanize support that extends beyond traditional partisan lines.

4. A Candidate of the Times – Choiseul/Saltibus wants change, but not just any change. They want someone they trust to represent them with authenticity and passion. Kiffo embodies that.

A Call to the SLP Leadership

The SLP cannot afford to continue second-guessing itself in Choiseul/Saltibus. The people are watching, the opposition is preparing, and Keithson Charles is already on the move. Every day of indecision is a day wasted.

If the administration truly listens to the people, the choice is clear: endorse Keithson “Kiffo” Charles now. Give him the official backing to match the momentum he has already built, and let him focus fully on unseating Bradly Felix.

Because in Choiseul/Saltibus, hesitation is not strategy—it’s self-sabotage

The She-Factor : How Women’s Issues Could Decimate Saint Lucia’s Incumbent in Upcoming Elections

The raw, unfiltered truth? Women hold the knife-edge in Saint Lucia’s looming general elections. From unsolved murders to economic despair, a powder keg of gender-driven frustrations threatens to explode at the polls. Forget party loyalty—this is about survival, justice, and raw betrayal. 

If you still think the “women’s vote” is just a soft, feel-good talking point, wake up. In St Lucia’s next general election (due by 2026), women are the swing bloc, the conscience, and the checkbook—rolled into one. Ignore them, and you lose. Full stop.

1. The Ghost of Kimberly De Leon: Institutional Betrayal & Missing Evidence

Kimberly De Leon’s 2018 murder isn’t just unsolved—it’s a symbol of state failure. Nearly seven years later, Police Commissioner Verne Garde admits crucial evidence is missing:

The firearm sent overseas for ballistics testing? Gone.

The noose from Shakadan Daniel’s 2013 death in police custody? Gone.

This isn’t mere negligence—it’s systemic rot. PM Philip J. Pierre calls it a “national outcry,” but the government’s inaction screams complicity. When evidence disappears in state custody, the message to women is chilling: “Your life is disposable.” In places like Castries and Micoud—where these victims lived—this isn’t politics; it’s personal trauma, and voters may return the favour at the ballot box.

2. Sheflation: Economic Despair with a Female Face

"Sheflation" isn’t just a buzzword—it’s a chokehold. Women in Saint Lucia are:

More educated (25.7% women vs. 17.3% men have tertiary degrees) yet less employed.

Carrying disproportionate caregiving burdens, blocking career growth.

Bearing the brunt of inflation in food, childcare, and healthcare.

The UN’s own data shows the crisis, but the government’s 2024-2025 Country Plan offers no real teeth for women’s economic empowerment. In labour-heavy constituencies like Vieux Fort South and Gros Islet—where women dominate low-wage tourism and agriculture—this neglect is political dynamite.

3. Violence Against Women: Polished PR vs. Bleak Reality

Yes, Saint Lucia launched a GBV Emergency Response Task Force (Dec 2024) and rolled out a Clinical Management of Rape Protocol (May 2025). But:

They’re reactive, not preventative.

Training healthcare workers after rape doesn’t stop rape.

Disaster protocols—critical given hurricanes and floods—are untested, even as UNFPA warns GBV spikes during crises.

With 40% of Caribbean women experiencing GBV, rural districts like Soufrière or Dennery—where resources are scarce—see this as hollow theater. Symbolism over substance bleeds votes.

4. Female Candidates: The Opposition’s Calculated Siege

The UWP is rolling out five fresh faces, including strong female contenders:

Leanna “Lady Lee” Johannes (Vieux Fort South): Media-savvy, deeply rooted in her community.

Marcella Johnson (Gros Islet): Businesswoman targeting women’s economic struggles.

These aren’t token picks—they’re strategic threats in SLP strongholds. If they weaponize De Leon’s murder or GBV policy failures, the incumbent could lose critical seats.

                                       Key Women’s Issues by Constituency

Constituency	Pressure Points	Threat to Incumbent
Castries        Kimberly De Leon	Sheflation	High – Symbol of state failure
Micoud Shakadan Daniel	Rural poverty	Critical – Fury over injustice
Vieux Fort South	UWP’s Johannes  Job losses	Severe – Swing seat potential
Gros Islet	UWP’s Johnson GBV gaps	Moderate – Business vote erosion
Dennery North Agriculture collapse	Care burdens	High – Rural women mobilization

5. The Youth Factor: Daughters Watching

First-time female voters (18–25) are educated, unemployed, and done waiting. At the Intergenerational Leadership Mixer (March 2025), they voiced frustration loud and clear. Dismiss them as “future leaders,” and they’ll punish you now—in urban battlegrounds like Castries Central.

The Verdict: Blood in the Water

The Pierre administration’s fate hinges on three big questions:

1. Will there be a breakthrough in the De Leon case? (Unlikely—evidence is “missing.”)

2. Can GBV protocols be transformed into real street-level safety? (Doubtful without time and funding.)

3. Will UWP’s female candidates outflank the SLP in empathy and trust? (Signs point to yes.)

Prediction: Constituencies with high female turnout and deep-seated trauma—like Micoud and Castries—will revolt. Marginal seats like Vieux Fort South and Gros Islet could fall to the opposition.

If women stay home, the incumbent limps on. If they mobilize? It’s a bloodbath. Either way, women write the ending.

The Crime Crisis: A Clear and Present Danger to Philip J. Pierre’s Re-Election Chances in 2026

Let’s not sugar-coat it. Crime in Saint Lucia has reached alarming levels, and it is no longer just a social issue—it is a political time bomb. If the Saint Lucia Labour Party (SLP), under the leadership of Prime Minister Philip J. Pierre, does not act decisively and transparently to stem the tide of criminal violence, the consequences at the polls in 2026 could be brutal. The public is watching, hurting, and growing impatient. And in politics, perception is everything.

Crime Is the Elephant in the Room

For too long, the SLP has downplayed or deflected when it comes to the spiraling homicide rate, gang violence, and the general breakdown in law and order. The numbers don’t lie. Year after year, Saint Lucia continues to record one of the highest per capita murder rates in the region. Citizens are living in fear—business owners are losing sleep, parents are terrified for their children, and entire communities feel abandoned.

And while the government continues to tout infrastructure projects and economic numbers, it’s clear that none of that matters if people don’t feel safe. You can’t drive on a new road if you're afraid you might get shot before you get home. You can’t enjoy a better minimum wage if you’re mourning the death of your teenage son who was in the wrong place at the wrong time. Crime cancels out progress.

Pierre’s Achilles Heel

Philip J. Pierre came to power promising “People First.” But in the eyes of many, that slogan rings hollow when gangs are ruling the streets and justice feels like a distant dream. His administration has yet to demonstrate a firm, effective strategy for national security. The National Security Ministry under his watch is seen as underwhelming and reactive, not proactive. A few community programs and lip service to youth development won’t cut it when the bullets are flying.

Worse yet, there’s an emerging narrative—especially in UWP circles and among independents—that Pierre’s government is more concerned with optics than outcomes. That they prioritize political survival over public safety. That the SLP will protect loyalty over competence in their appointments. This kind of talk sticks, especially when backed by rising crime stats and visible street violence.

The Political Cost of Fear

In a small island democracy like Saint Lucia, fear becomes a potent political force. And right now, fear is swelling. Fear of break-ins, fear of carjackings, fear of gang retaliation. This fear turns into anger. And that anger turns into votes—against the incumbent.

Come 2026, voters will not just be assessing what Pierre has built—they’ll be asking what he has failed to protect. If the SLP goes into the next election with crime still out of control, Pierre’s record will be torn apart by opponents and weaponized in every constituency. Safe seats will feel the heat. Marginal seats will swing. The narrative of "change" that got him elected in 2021 could easily be turned against him if people start to believe anyone is better than a government that can’t keep them safe.

The Clock Is Ticking

Pierre still has time, but not much. He must lead the charge against crime—not delegate it to ministers, not bury it in bureaucratic committees, not spin it through PR campaigns. The country needs real action. Real results. Real leadership.

If not, the SLP will walk into the 2026 general elections with blood on its hands—not just politically, but in the minds of a public that no longer feels safe. And in politics, that’s not just a liability—it’s a death sentence.

🌟 Kina Nicholas: From Debreuil to the World as a 2025 Chevening Scholar 🇱🇨🎓

A proud and powerful moment has dawned upon the community of Choiseul-Saltibus, and indeed, all of Saint Lucia. One of our own, the brilliant and ambitious Kina Nicholas of Debreuil, Choiseul, has been named a 2025 Chevening Scholar!

The Chevening Scholarship—funded by the UK Government—is one of the world’s most prestigious international scholarship programs. It offers outstanding emerging leaders from around the globe the chance to pursue a one-year master’s degree in the United Kingdom. But Chevening is so much more than a scholarship—it’s an investment in individuals who have the passion, vision, and drive to shape a better world. And Kina is a perfect embodiment of that vision.

Chevening Scholar

Daughter of the Soil

The daughter of Lynette Nicholas, Kina grew up in the humble but proud community of Debreuil. From an early age, her brilliance shone through—her curiosity, resilience, and unwavering drive made her stand out as a leader in the making. Today, her journey takes her all the way to the halls of some of the UK's finest academic institutions. But even as she rises, she carries with her the heartbeat of Choiseul, the warmth of our people, and the hopes of a new generation.

Impact Beyond Borders

Kina’s Chevening journey will be more than just academic. As part of a global network of change-makers, she will have the chance to influence conversations on development, innovation, and leadership. And when she returns home, Saint Lucia will be richer—not just with knowledge, but with purpose, connections, and ideas that can spark real change.

We Celebrate You, Kina!

We beam with pride as Kina lifts the Saint Lucian flag high. Her success is a testament to hard work, sacrifice, and the power of dreams. She inspires not just the young girls of Debreil, but the entire Choiseul-Saltibus constituency and every Saint Lucian striving for more.

Congratulations, Kina Nicholas!

May your journey be fruitful, your purpose be fulfilled, and your light shine brighter with every step.

Choiseul is proud. Saint Lucia is proud. You were born for this.

God bless you!

Bradley Thanks Choiseul-Saltibus – The Journey Continues with Flex!

Four years in opposition have been no easy road, Bradly laments; they have tested his strength, sharpened his vision, and deepened his love for the people of Choiseul-Saltibus. He continues, "Yet, here I stand—stronger, more determined, and more fired up than ever before!"

"To every single person who stood in line, braving the heat, the wait, and the uncertainty just to place that powerful “X” for Flex—I THANK YOU." He is very much aware that trust is not taken lightly and that each vote was not just a mark on a ballot, but a voice declaring that Choiseul-Saltibus deserves leadership with heart, courage, and unwavering dedication.

This journey is far from over. In fact, it’s only the beginning of the next chapter. "The fire still burns within me, the mission to serve and uplift this community still lives on, and the love I have for you—my people—remains unshakable!" Flex reiterates

Flex reminds his constituents that they have weathered storms before, and together, we will rise again. Like the sun that sets only to rise brighter and stronger at dawn, Flex is ready to rise for Choiseul-Saltibus!

Bradly is confident that as we continue this program of progress, unity, and empowerment, he promises this: "Our best days are ahead. With your continued support, we will build on the foundation we’ve started and create a future that every Choiseul-Saltibus resident can be proud of."

The journey continues, the passion is alive, and together, we will make it happen.

Flex 💛

"The sun sets only to rise again. We will rise again!"

Living on Crown Land for 30+ Years? Here's What You Need to Know…

There’s been a lot of talk lately about people who have been living on Crown land (government land) for decades. Some believe that after 30 years, the land becomes theirs automatically. But let’s set the record straight:

Under the law of Saint Lucia, this is not true.

Even if you've lived on Crown land for 30, 40, or even 50 years — that land does not become yours unless the government gives you legal permission or a title.

So what happens to long-time squatters?

From time to time, the government may run programs to “regularize” these situations. That means: ✅ Offering people a chance to buy the land at a reduced cost

✅ Helping with official documents or leases

✅ Granting legal title in special cases

BUT — this is not a right, and it doesn’t happen automatically. It’s more like a special offer or amnesty. The government is not legally required to give you the land — it’s a choice they make to help regularize informal settlements.

A Bottom Line:

Living on Crown land for decades doesn’t make you the owner.

Only the government can give you legal title.

If you’ve been living on Crown land for many years, look out for official government programs and take advantage of them when they come!

Help spread the truth. Let’s all stay informed and encourage each other to work within the law.

#CrownLand #KnowYourRights #StLuciaLaw #HousingFacts #PublicAwareness #RayneauOnTheMove

Why Students Are Failing Math—and What We’re Getting Wrong

Picture this:

The school bell hasn’t rung yet, and a group of students is huddled over a notebook, frantically copying down last night’s math homework. Not because they didn’t care to do it, but because somewhere along the way, they were taught that points matter more than understanding. That ticking a box is more important than mastering a concept.

Sound familiar?

It should. It’s the daily reality in too many classrooms across the St Lucia—and it's a significant factor behind the concerning trends in Math performance in recent CPEA exams.

Let’s be honest. Math isn't the enemy here. It's the system.

Just ask any frustrated student who scored poorly despite putting in hours of homework… or any burnt-out teacher grading yet another worksheet filled with guesswork instead of real growth.

The truth is, we’ve built a school culture obsessed with compliance.

Finish the homework. Memorize the method. Ace the test.

And if you don’t? Well, better luck next time.

But here's a radical idea—what if we threw that tradition out the window?

That’s what one teacher, Jake, did. No more one-and-done tests. No more homework that students rushed through or copied at the last minute. Instead, he built a classroom based on feedback, retakes, and most importantly—growth.

And guess what?

The results were everything we hoped for in Math education.

Higher test scores. More confident students. And teachers who weren’t running on empty.

The Numbers Don’t Lie

Recent data from Saint Lucia's 2024 CPEA results highlight the issue. While the overall national mean improved to 77.08%, the Math scores told a different story. The national mean for Mathematics was 73.09%, lagging behind other subjects like Science, Language, and Social Studies, which all scored above 77.9% .

This stagnation in Math contrasts with significant improvements in other subjects, indicating a systemic issue in how we approach Math education.

So why are so many of our classrooms still stuck?

Because we’re clinging to a system that’s not working.

A system where students are racing for grades—not understanding.

Where fear of failure is stronger than the desire to learn.

CPEA scores are telling us something. They’re a wake-up call.

Not that our kids aren’t smart. Not that they’re lazy.

But that we need to rethink how we teach Math.

Imagine a classroom where students can make mistakes without penalty. Where they can take a second shot at a concept, and actually get better because of it. Where learning is the goal—not just passing.

That’s the kind of shift we need. From points to progress.

From performance pressure to purpose-driven learning.

Because if we want different results, we have to dare to teach differently.

It’s not just about Math. It’s about giving our students a fighting chance to love learning again.

Call to Action:

Parents, engage with your child’s teacher about how feedback is utilized in the classroom. Teachers, consider implementing one small change toward growth-based learning next school year. It could make all the difference in how our children perform… and more importantly, how they learn.

PUTTING PIERRE FIRST - By Anonymous

Philip J Pierre

Tension is rising in Choiseul about who the selected candidate for the St. Lucia Labour Party will be for the forth-coming general elections. What started as ‘promising’ that four individuals had indicated their willingness to contest the seat became less so as a fifth individual joined the race long after the deadline for applications had been closed and the initial four individuals had been interviewed (at least once).

WHY WAS THE PROCESS REOPENED?

Anxiety immediately started growing once the latest application was accepted and the individual had been interviewed. Constituents then began asking various questions, among them:

Is the last applicant the preferred candidate of ‘the parry’?

What advantage(s) does the last applicant bring, given that he was the current district representative’s attaché?

Is it that the initial four candidates lack the social and political profile of ‘the party’?

It is fair to say that none of these questions has been answered either by the ‘the party’ or the constituents themselves.

THE IMPLICATIONS

Months after the intimal interviews, no announcements have been made regarding the situation as speculation and division grow among the constituents. Understandingly so, the memories of the last general elections have resurfaced with the emphasis again placed on the party executives’ disregard for the wishes of the local electorate. What has emerged is a complex web of possibilities none of which brings any advantage to the selected candidate at wining the incumbent parliamentary representative at the general elections as things stand on the ground. The key issues at play seem to be:

A GENUINE commitment on the parts of individual contestants to support whoever is selected.  Given that it is alleged that at least one contestant disclosed at an interview that he will not support the lone female contestant, genuine commitment seems unlikely.  

The publicly known fact that TWO of the current contestants, including the last contestant, DID NOT support the selected candidate in the last general elections certainly raises concern.

The CAPACITY of the individual contestants to influence their base to support the selected candidate whoever that may be, is also a mammoth challenge.

The EFFORT AND RESOURCES required to REUNITE a clearly divided local electorate, and in addition, TO FIGHT THE OPPOSITION  while can yield benefits will have to be tremendous. Petty roadside contracts may not suffice.

THE FINAL DECISION vs POPULAR CHOICE

Who becomes the selected candidate remains any body’s guess. But clearly, the only clue offered so far lies in the selectors’ decision to reopen the process of selection well after the set deadline. Whether or not facilitating/selecting that last contestant reflects popular choice is a different matter that matters a WHOLE LOT. So the hope is that the process reflects popular choice, which at the moment is very visibly NOT the last contestant. 

PUTTING THE PM FIRST

The catch phrase of the Prime minister has been PUTTING THE PEOPLE FIRST, and certainly, the many projects and initiatives of Prime Minister so far, reflect that mantra. So the expectation is that the phrase will hold for the people of Choiseul as it pertains to their preferred choice of candidate reflected by survey after survey. Until the outcome of the selection process i'm PUTTING PIERRE FIRST.

Editor's note : The author of this piece requested that his name be withheld.

In Defense of Boldness: Allen Chastanet's Call Wasn't Folly—It Was Leadership

 In its June 21 editorial, The Jamaica Gleaner painted St. Lucia’s Opposition Leader Allen Chastanet as a political maverick lost in a “twilight zone” for merely daring to question the effectiveness of CARICOM. But if asking uncomfortable questions that reflect the lived frustrations of many CARICOM member states is “folly,” then perhaps we need more of that so-called madness.

Let’s be honest: CARICOM, for all its noble ideals, has underperformed. Its well-documented “implementation deficit,” glacial pace of integration, and habit of overlooking the concerns of smaller member states are not myths—they are recurring frustrations. Mr. Chastanet, in speaking to fellow OECS leaders, voiced the silent discontent many leaders are too diplomatic—or too fearful—to utter. That is not recklessness. That is leadership.

The Right to Question

The editorial insists that Mr. Chastanet’s question—“Would we be better off negotiating bilateral agreements rather than remaining in CARICOM?”—is dangerous. But is it really? Asking whether CARICOM still works as intended is not the same as calling for its destruction. In fact, it is a necessary question that any responsible leader should be willing to examine—especially given the deepening challenges of regional inequality, climate change, food insecurity, and global political shifts.

Let us not forget that institutions must evolve or risk irrelevance. CARICOM was formed in 1973. Today’s geopolitical landscape, economic dynamics, and youth expectations are not the same. If CARICOM is beyond criticism, then it is already beyond saving.

A Voice for the Marginalized

Mr. Chastanet’s recollection of feeling disrespected and ignored during CARICOM deliberations is not an isolated complaint—it is a reflection of a structural imbalance in the regional bloc. Smaller states like those in the OECS often feel like silent partners in a conversation dominated by the more populous countries. If the voices of smaller members are not being taken seriously, what incentive is there to remain bound to a structure that doesn’t evolve?

Rather than attack the messenger, regional leaders and commentators ought to examine the message. Instead of dismissing Chastanet’s words as irresponsible, the region should ask why he—and many others—feel this way. Ignoring the problem doesn’t make it go away.

The Real Risk: Complacency

The Gleaner rightly points out that CARICOM is

 an “imperfect institution”—but then uses that as a shield against change. That logic is exactly why regionalism has stagnated. If not now, then when is the time to evaluate the usefulness of our institutions? And who better than someone who has sat at the highest levels of CARICOM decision-making to raise those questions?

Let’s also not overlook the irony: the same editorial admits Jamaica once withdrew from the West Indies Federation—yet still feels entitled to scold others for contemplating similar paths. Jamaica, too, knows what it means to question regional alliances when national interest is at stake.

A Wake-Up Call

Far from being a loose cannon, Allen Chastanet is acting as a catalyst for an overdue conversation. The Caribbean doesn’t need cheerleaders for the status quo. It needs leaders unafraid to challenge institutional inertia and spark debate about how we actually move forward—together or otherwise.

So no, Allen Chastanet hasn’t lost his way. He’s just walking a road fewer have the courage to tread.

Forgotten Communities, Forgotten People: A Wake-Up Call from Roblot, Choiseul

As a concerned citizen of Roblot, Choiseul, I cannot sit in silence any longer.

With general elections looming—constitutionally due in 2026 but rumored to be called earlier—it's time to reflect, reassess, and rise. For too long, we the people of La Maze, Debreuil, Roblot, and Riviere Dorée have been fed crumbs under the guise of development. We've been pacified with footpaths, drains, and temporary grass-cutting jobs, while our communities cry out for real transformation—education, empowerment, and opportunity.

Just take a look around.

In Roblot, our community center remains locked, untouched and underutilized. Built with taxpayer dollars, it sits there as a silent monument to broken promises—walled off from the very people it was intended to serve. What kind of leadership allows such a resource to lie idle in the face of growing unemployment, especially among our youth?

This isn’t just a Roblot issue. La Maze, Debreuil, and Riviere Dorée have suffered the same fate: neglected, under-resourced, and spoken about only when it’s time for votes. The cries of our young people are deafening. They are not lazy—they are idle because no one has given them the tools or opportunities to rise.

Instead of youth development programs, instead of skills training centers, what did we get?

A bar.

Yes, a bar—soon to be built on what was once prime government land near Choiseul Secondary School. Land that could have been transformed into a vocational training center, a small business incubator, a community IT hub—anything that contributes to the development of human capital. But that would’ve required foresight. That would’ve required politicians to put people over personal gain.

The problem isn’t a lack of resources. The problem is a lack of vision.

And now, as another election cycle creeps upon us, the same tired tactics will return. We’ll be told once again to vote for roads, for handouts, for favors. But we are not fools. We are not beggars. We are citizens with a right to thrive, not just survive.

It’s time we demand better.

What are these politicians offering for the advancement of the people—not just their party base, but the entire community? Where are the proposals for literacy and computer classes? Where are the workshops on entrepreneurship, agriculture, hospitality, and trades? Where are the plans for our youth, our single parents, our unemployed men and women?

If they have no plan for our development, then they are not worthy of our votes.

We must be vigilant. We must be bold. We must ask the tough questions and demand real answers—not flashy slogans or last-minute giveaways. The campaign trail will be noisy, but let us listen not to the volume of their voices, but to the substance of their message.

No more blind loyalty. No more empty promises. No more selling our dignity for a ride to town or a free t-shirt.

This time, Roblot, La Maze, Debreuil, and Riviere Dorée will not be silenced.

We will rise.

We will speak.

And we will vote not for politicians, but for progress.

🔴 SLP’s Choiseul/Saltibus Gamble: Back to the Drawing Board?

A little birdie tells us that the Saint Lucia Labour Party (SLP) has unofficially narrowed its focus to two potential candidates for the Choiseul/Saltibus seat in the upcoming general elections: Darrion and Pauline. If this is true, then it’s safe to say that the SLP is on course to hand the seat right back to incumbent Bradly Felix of the United Workers Party (UWP)—on a silver platter.

One fired-up SLP supporter didn’t mince words, quipping in full Kwéyòl:

"Bradly kay bat tousel Darrion ek Pauline an menm tan!"
Translation? Bradly will beat them jointly. Ouch.

Let’s unpack why this decision could be politically suicidal for the Labour camp.

Darrion: From Attaché to Candidate?

Many in the constituency know Darrion as the former loudest cheerleader for Bradly Felix—not just a supporter, but what some described as “Bradly’s attaché.” His sudden shift to Labour has left even SLP loyalists puzzled, with murmurs of hypocrisy and backstabbing swirling across La Fargue and beyond.

It doesn’t help that La Fargue—his own backyard—is reportedly lukewarm about his candidacy.
So, we must ask the hard question: does Darrion even have a base?
If he’s struggling to command the support of his own neighbors, how will he penetrate the UWP’s strongholds?

To quote a local observer:

Espoir Mal Papie!”
A hapless hope indeed.

Pauline: History Repeats Itself?

As for Pauline, let’s talk numbers:
In the 2016 General Election, she was defeated by Bradly Felix by over 400 votes—and that was with a full campaign and the momentum of being a fresh face.
Fast forward to 2025, and the landscape looks even dimmer.

Her disengagement with grassroots supporters over the last four years is a glaring red flag. Constituents whisper about her:

• Rare visits
• Poor delegation of responsibilities
• Recycling of contracts within the same inner circle
• Eroding trust from key community mobilizers

According to one influential foot soldier:

“Pauline wants to run the show alone. She doesn’t trust anyone with real responsibility.”

Even in her traditional strongholds in the eastern part of the constituency, support is said to be waning.

The Keithson Question: Why Bypass a Rising Star?

Now, here’s where it gets interesting.
Keithson Charles, who has made serious inroads into Bradly’s base, is being mysteriously sidelined. Why?

Yes, elections are near. Yes, a lot of work would need to be done to bolster his readiness. But Keithson was around before Darrion even blinked Labour red. So why this sudden leapfrogging?

Could it be political favoritism? Internal party dynamics? Or is SLP simply betting on the wrong horses?

Looking Ahead: December 8, 2025?

This blog strongly predicts the next general election will be held on Monday, December 8, 2025—timed to coincide with the handover of the St. Jude Hospital. With National Day falling that same weekend, the SLP will likely seek to turn victory (or survival) into a nationwide celebration from December 13–15.

But here’s the rub: If Darrion or Pauline is leading the charge in Choiseul/Saltibus, that “celebration” might just skip this constituency.

Final Thoughts

If the SLP is serious about reclaiming Choiseul/Saltibus, they need to rethink their strategy.
Darrion’s credibility issues and Pauline’s disconnection from her base won’t cut it. Bradly Felix may not be invincible—but he’s not beatable by default.

Labour, take heed:
Sometimes, the best way forward is to look within your ranks and ask not “who has the title?” but “who has the trust of the people?”

Otherwise, Bradly might just waltz back into office—unbothered, unbeaten, and unchallenged.

Stop the Madness! Political Oversight Isn’t a Crime — It’s a Duty”

This so-called commentary posted on St Lucia News Online is not only embarrassing in its logic, it's an insult to the intelligence of Saint Lucians. Let’s call this what it is — propaganda masquerading as public concern by so called "Caribbean Writers".

Let’s tear into this foolishness point by point:

1. "Political sabotage"? Really?
Since when is showing up at a construction site — a publicly funded site — considered sabotage? Is the public no longer allowed to question delays, check progress, or challenge the government on transparency? If Allen Chastanet is trespassing, say so and let the law handle it — don’t inflate it into some Mission Impossible movie plot.

2. "Dangerous escalation"? From what — visiting sites? Asking questions?
This article is riddled with fear-mongering, claiming Chastanet is "jeopardizing public safety." How exactly? With a camera crew and some tough questions? The real danger here is the suggestion that political leaders must stay silent or risk being branded enemies of the state.

3. “Strengthen security to stop him”?
This recommendation is laughable. We’re talking about public infrastructure funded by taxpayers. Is the government now building bunkers instead of hospitals? If these projects are so sensitive that an opposition leader showing up is a threat, what are you really hiding?

4. Irony, thy name is this article.
To accuse Chastanet of being desperate because he’s criticizing projects his government started or failed to finish — isn’t that just normal political accountability? Or is the Labour Party now allergic to scrutiny?

5. “This is not about politics.”
Please. This entire piece is dripping with partisanship. It reads more like a press release from a ruling party spin doctor than a credible piece of journalism. The dramatic language, the hollow praise of the government, and the complete absence of counterpoints scream bias.

 Bottom Line:

This isn’t journalism. It’s an attempt to paint legitimate political critique as terrorism. If a sitting opposition leader showing up to inspect government work is now "sabotage," then democracy itself is under threat — not from Chastanet, but from the authors of this nonsense.

Security shouldn’t be used as a shield to block public inquiry. If your projects are sound, let them stand up to scrutiny. If they’re not — well, no amount of fences and cameras will save you from public judgment.

Let’s keep our eyes on real sabotage: corruption, incompetence, and the silencing of dissent.

Let the people decide who’s desperate — we know the smell of fear when we see it in print.