๐ฑ๐จ Baton Relay or Parliament Bench? A Question of Priorities for Choiseul
Choiseul is a proud and patriotic constituency. We show up for national celebrations, community activities, and anything that uplifts Saint Lucia. So when the Independence Baton Relay passed through our communities, many residents welcomed the moment with enthusiasm and pride.
However, a growing concern has emerged that deserves calm, mature, and honest discussion.
๐️ What Was Happening in Parliament That Day?
The sitting of the House of Assembly included serious matters such as:
- Changes to VAT interest and penalty arrangements
- Amendments to Income Tax legislation
- Amendments to the Public Procurement Act
These are not ceremonial items. These decisions shape how much people and businesses pay, how government spends public money, and how transparent procurement processes remain.
⚖️ Why Parliamentary Presence Matters
When voters elect a representative, they are not only choosing someone to attend community events. They are choosing someone to:
- Represent their voice in national lawmaking
- Scrutinize legislation
- Debate policies
- Vote on their behalf
Being present in Parliament is not optional decoration—it is the core job.
๐ Celebrations vs. Responsibilities
Independence activities are meaningful expressions of national pride. Communities appreciate seeing their representatives participating.
But a baton relay can be attended by many leaders.
When Parliament is sitting, that seat represents Choiseul’s voice in the country’s highest decision-making body.
๐ A Reasonable Expectation
Choiseul residents are not asking for perfection.
They are asking for balance.
When Parliament is in session and serious matters are on the agenda, the first stop should be the House of Assembly.
After that—yes—come join the relay. Come greet constituents. Come celebrate Independence.
But the laws of Saint Lucia must come first.
๐ฃ️ Final Thoughts
This is not about personalities. It is not about party colors. It is about standards.
If we want stronger governance, better policies, and accountable leadership, then attendance in Parliament must be treated as a sacred duty—not a scheduling option.





