COULD AI REALLY DESTROY HUMANITY? Let’s Talk About This Without the Hype

I have been following a story coming out of the United States, and I will admit that it caught my attention.

The headline is frightening.

Artificial Intelligence could become so powerful that it poses a threat to humanity, possibly within the next decade.

Now before anybody starts throwing away their phone, shutting down their computer or blaming ChatGPT for everything wrong in the world, let us understand what is actually being said.

Because there is a difference between saying AI WILL destroy humanity and saying there is a risk that future AI could become dangerous if humans lose control of it.

And that difference is important.

The warning is coming from people inside the industry

What makes this story worth paying attention to is that these warnings are not simply coming from somebody sitting in his bedroom watching science-fiction movies.

Some of them are coming from researchers who have actually worked on advanced AI.

Former Anthropic and OpenAI researcher Jacob Coxon recently raised concerns about where this technology is heading and whether humans will be able to reliably control much more powerful AI systems.

Another Anthropic researcher, Evan Hubinger, has publicly put his own estimate of the risk of an AI catastrophe killing everyone within the next decade at greater than 10 percent.

That doesn't mean there is a scientific calculation proving we have a 10 percent chance of extinction.

It is his assessment of the risk.

But think about it another way.

If an engineer told you there was a 10 percent chance that a bridge would collapse while you were crossing it, would you drive across?

I wouldn't.

And that is why I don't believe we should simply laugh at these people.

But how can a computer destroy the world?

That was my question too.

My little laptop sitting on my desk cannot suddenly get up and attack anybody.

Neither can your cellphone.

And the AI systems we are using today are not the super-intelligent machines these researchers are worried about.

The concern is about what comes next.

Suppose AI eventually becomes capable of performing many intellectual tasks better than humans.

Suppose it can write its own computer programs, find weaknesses in computer networks, operate other machines, manipulate people, conduct scientific research and make decisions at a speed humans simply cannot match.

Then suppose we begin giving those systems more independence.

That is where the concern begins.

The danger doesn't necessarily require some evil robot waking up one morning and saying, "I hate humans."

The problem could be much simpler.

We give an extremely powerful system a goal.

It finds a way of accomplishing that goal that we never anticipated.

Then we discover that stopping it is much harder than starting it.

We have seen a smaller version of this problem before

Human beings have a habit of inventing first and dealing with the consequences afterwards.

We built cars before we developed the road-safety systems we have today.

We embraced social media before fully understanding what misinformation, addiction, algorithms and mass manipulation could do.

We developed plastics without imagining that decades later we would be finding microplastics practically everywhere.

The invention comes first.

The rules usually come afterwards.

With ordinary technology, we sometimes get a second chance.

The people sounding the alarm about advanced AI are asking a troubling question:

What if this is one technology where getting it badly wrong does not give us a second chance?

That is the part of this discussion that bothers me.

Senator Jon Ossoff has entered the discussion

This concern has now reached American politics.

U.S. Senator Jon Ossoff has called for stronger oversight of advanced AI research, including inspectors at major AI laboratories and international cooperation.

And whether you agree with him or not, the basic question deserves an answer.

Who is watching the people building the world's most powerful AI systems?

Right now there is enormous competition between technology companies.

There is also competition between countries.

Everybody wants to be first.

Everybody wants the most powerful system.

There are billions, perhaps eventually trillions, of dollars at stake.

That creates another problem.

Imagine two companies racing towards the same finish line.

One company says, "We should slow down and make sure this thing is safe."

The other says, "Fine. While you slow down, we'll get there first."

You can see the difficulty.

And where does little Saint Lucia fit into all this?

This is where I believe we in small countries need to start paying attention.

Most of the powerful AI systems being developed today are not being built in Saint Lucia, Dominica, Barbados or the rest of the Caribbean.

We are mainly consumers of the technology.

Yet if AI transforms employment, banking, education, journalism, cybersecurity, elections, warfare and the global economy, we will live with the consequences too.

Nobody will ask Saint Lucia whether the world should develop super-intelligent AI.

The decision will largely be made elsewhere.

But whatever comes from that decision will eventually arrive on our shores.

Already our children are using AI for schoolwork.

Businesses are using it.

Governments will increasingly use it.

People like me use it to research, write, create and understand things that previously might have taken hours or days.

There is tremendous good in this technology.

I can see it myself.

But something can be extremely useful and still require rules.

Electricity is useful.

We still put breakers in our houses.

Cars are useful.

We still put brakes on them.

Medicine saves lives.

We still regulate drugs.

So why should the most powerful AI systems humanity has ever created be treated differently?

Are we all going to die in ten years?

Nobody knows.

And anybody telling you that scientists have proven AI will wipe out humanity within ten years is going too far.

They haven't.

There is enormous disagreement among AI researchers about how likely these extreme scenarios really are.

Some researchers believe the extinction warnings deserve urgent attention.

Others think those scenarios are too speculative and distract attention from problems AI is already causing today.

And those present-day problems are real enough.

Scammers can use AI.

Criminals can use AI.

Governments can use AI for surveillance.

Fake photographs, voices and videos are becoming harder to distinguish from genuine ones.

Workers could find some jobs disappearing or changing.

Students can become dependent on AI instead of learning how to think.

And powerful technology concentrated in the hands of a few companies or governments creates problems of its own.

We don't have to wait for some super-intelligent robot to see reasons for concern.

So should we be afraid of AI?

I wouldn't use the word afraid.

I would say we should be awake.

AI could turn out to be one of humanity's greatest tools.

It could help discover medicines, improve education, increase productivity, assist people with disabilities, improve disaster forecasting and solve problems we presently struggle to solve.

I don't want us to throw that away because somebody frightened us with a headline.

But neither should we become so fascinated by what AI can do that we stop asking what it should be allowed to do.

That is the conversation I believe ordinary people should be having.

Not:

"Will robots kill us next Tuesday?"

But:

Who controls increasingly powerful AI?

Who decides how far it goes?

Who makes sure it is safe?

Who is responsible when something goes wrong?

And perhaps most importantly:

Are governments putting the brakes and steering wheel on this thing while there is still time to do it?

I use AI.

I appreciate what it allows me to do.

I also believe that when some of the very people helping to build this technology start warning the rest of us about where it could eventually lead, we should at least listen.

Don't panic.

Don't swallow every frightening headline either.

But don't laugh this one away.

Sometimes the sensible thing to do when somebody who understands the machinery tells you there might be a problem under the hood is to open the bonnet and have a proper look.

Choiseul on the Move

 

KIFFO, BRING THE WATER DISCUSSION HOME TO CHOISEUL-SALTIBUS

“You cannot build a 21st-century economy on 19th-century pipes.”

Those were strong words from Hon. Keithson “Kiffo” Charles, parliamentary representative for Choiseul-Saltibus and the minister responsible for utilities, as he celebrated the launch of the US$22.8 million John Compton Dam Raw Water Pipeline Replacement Project.

And he is right.

According to the information shared by the minister, the 40-year-old pipeline serves approximately 58 percent of Saint Lucia’s population and has been experiencing as many as 30 major failures per year. It clearly needs to be replaced.

The WASCO workers who have been going into difficult and dangerous areas to repair the damaged line also deserve the recognition given to them.

But after reading the minister’s Facebook post, one question immediately came to mind:

What about Choiseul-Saltibus?

While our representative is celebrating a major water project in the north and using hashtags such as #KiffoWorks and #ActionNotTalk, many of the people who elected him are still receiving water only twice per week.

That is the reality in Roblot, Debreuil, Lamaze and several other communities.

In some areas, residents say the duration of the water supply has decreased significantly over the past few years. The water comes for a few hours and disappears again. Families must rush to fill drums and tanks, wash their clothes and complete as many household chores as possible before the pipes run dry.

Sometimes the water arrives late at night. If you are sleeping, you may miss it.

People are paying water bills, buying tanks, installing pumps and making all kinds of arrangements simply to have enough water for their basic needs.

That is not a dependable water service.

WHAT ABOUT OUR OWN OLD AND LEAKING PIPES?

The minister described the 40-year-old John Compton Dam pipeline as a “ticking time bomb.”

Fair enough.

But what would he call some of the pipelines serving Choiseul-Saltibus?

The Sauzay-to-Choiseul Village line is reported to be more than 80 years old. The Debreuil-to-Lamaze line is said to be almost 60 years old. Several other sections of the Choiseul water network are also believed to be old, undersized and vulnerable to leaks.

WASCO should publicly confirm the ages and conditions of these lines.

If the figures being circulated are incorrect, give us the correct information. If they are accurate, tell us why these pipelines are still in service and when they will be replaced.

We keep hearing about water shortages, broken lines, low pressure and communities being placed on schedules. But how much of our treated water is being lost before it reaches the consumer?

How can we continue asking residents to conserve every bucket of water while old pipes may be leaking thousands of gallons into the ground?

This is not a new problem. It has followed the people of Choiseul-Saltibus for years. What we need now is not another general statement about WASCO’s challenges. We need a clear plan for our constituency.

KIFFO IS NOT ONLY THE REPRESENTATIVE

This is where the matter becomes even more serious.

Kiffo is not only the parliamentary representative for Choiseul-Saltibus. He is also the minister responsible for utilities.

He cannot stand on the outside and say the water problem belongs to somebody else. This matter sits directly within his ministerial responsibility.

That gives him both the opportunity and the duty to push for improvements.

So let us ask some direct questions:

• How many communities in Choiseul-Saltibus are receiving water only once or twice per week?
• Why has the duration of the supply reportedly decreased in communities such as Roblot, Debreuil and Lamaze?
• How much water is being lost through leaks in the Choiseul water network?
• Which pipelines have been identified for replacement?
• Is there a funded water-improvement plan for the constituency?
• What work will begin first, and when?
• What temporary assistance will be provided to families living under an unreliable water schedule?

These are reasonable questions. The minister should be able to provide reasonable answers.

WHAT HAS BEEN DONE ABOUT THE JOHN COMPTON DAM CHARGE?

There is also the long-standing issue that many residents refer to as the John Compton Dam tax.

People in Choiseul-Saltibus continue to question why they should carry a charge associated with the John Compton Dam while many communities in the constituency do not receive water from that dam.

This concern becomes even harder to accept when customers receive water only twice per week.

What has Kiffo done about it, not only as our representative, but as the minister responsible for utilities?

Has he instructed WASCO to review the charge?

Has he requested a technical or legal assessment to determine whether customers who do not benefit from the dam should continue paying it?

Has the matter been discussed at the level of Cabinet?

Has any proposal been prepared to remove or adjust the charge for affected consumers?

If action has been taken, the minister should put the information before the public. Show us the correspondence. Explain the process. Give residents a timetable.

If nothing has been done, then he must tell us why.

This is not an issue he has to carry to another minister. He is the minister. He is also the representative of the people making the complaint.

In this situation, Kiffo is not standing outside the door asking someone to let him in. He is one of the people holding the key.

ACTION MUST ALSO REACH CHOISEUL-SALTIBUS

No one is opposing the replacement of the John Compton Dam pipeline. A line serving such a large part of the country must be secured.

But our representative should be careful about celebrating “action” elsewhere while people in his constituency are still arranging their lives around two uncertain days of water.

The people of Choiseul-Saltibus need more than photographs, speeches and hashtags.

We need a constituency water-improvement plan. It should identify the old pipelines, the areas losing the most water, the communities with the poorest supply, the projects that have been approved, the money allocated and the dates when work is expected to begin.

Give us something we can measure.

Give us something we can monitor.

Give us something more substantial than another Facebook post.

Mr Minister and Parliamentary Representative, bring the water discussion home. Speak to the people of Roblot, Debreuil, Lamaze and every other community struggling with an unreliable supply.

Tell us what has been done.

Tell us what is planned.

Tell us when the old pipes will be replaced.

Tell us what you are doing about the John Compton Dam charge.

Most importantly, tell us when the people of Choiseul-Saltibus can expect water to flow through their pipes regularly and for a reasonable length of time.

If a 40-year-old pipeline in the north is a ticking time bomb, then the ageing lines in Choiseul-Saltibus cannot be treated as a minor inconvenience.

Water is life in the north, but water is also life in Choiseul-Saltibus.

 WHEN A RANT BECOMES A THREAT: THE VIRAL VIDEO SAINT LUCIA SHOULD NOT SIMPLY LAUGH OFF

By Choiseul on the Move

By now, many Saint Lucians have probably seen or heard about the disturbing video circulating on social media.

A man, identified in media reports as a Saint Lucian who was deported from the United States, launches into an angry tirade about Saint Lucia. But this is not simply another man complaining about the country, the cost of living, unemployment or the difficulties of starting over.

The video attracted serious attention because some of his statements were interpreted as threats of violence against himself and other people.

And that is where we need to draw a line.

People are entitled to dislike Saint Lucia. They are entitled to complain about the Government, the police, the economy, the roads, the country or even their circumstances after being deported.

Freedom to express anger, however, does not mean that statements suggesting violence should simply be dismissed as "just talk."

According to reporting published on September 17, police are actively pursuing the man following circulation of the video.

There is also one very important fact that needs to be corrected.

This man was not brought into Saint Lucia under the recently discussed Third-Country Nationals programme.

Information attributed to the Ministry of External Affairs says he is Saint Lucian by birth and was deported from the United States to Saint Lucia in March 2023.

That distinction matters.

Social media moved quickly to connect his video with the controversial agreement involving third-country nationals transferred from the United States. Understandably, a frightening video appearing at a time when people are already questioning that programme creates fertile ground for rumours.

But two separate issues should not be forced together simply because doing so makes a more sensational story.

The Third-Country Nationals arrangement can and should be scrutinised on its own facts. Saint Lucians have every right to ask who is being accepted, what background checks are conducted, what safeguards exist and what happens if something goes wrong.

But this particular man should not be presented as evidence of a failure of that programme when the available information says he was deported to his own country three years ago.

BUT THERE IS ANOTHER QUESTION

What happens when somebody goes online and makes statements capable of putting an entire population on edge?

Saint Lucia is already experiencing considerable anxiety surrounding violent crime. People are worried about their children. Women are concerned about their safety. Families are grieving.

This is therefore hardly the environment in which threats of violence should be treated as entertainment.

The Royal Saint Lucia Police Force has itself recently warned the public about irresponsible information circulating electronically. Police have also pointed to provisions of the Computer Misuse Act concerning electronic communications that are menacing in character.

Whether this particular man's statements amount to a criminal offence is a matter for investigators and, ultimately, the courts. That determination should not be made by Facebook, TikTok or Choiseul on the Move.

But police are right to take potentially credible threats seriously.

DON'T TURN THIS INTO A MANHUNT

There is another side to this which is equally important.

Saint Lucians should not attempt to find, confront or punish this man themselves.

Do not see a photograph circulating on WhatsApp and decide that you are now investigator, judge and police officer.

If somebody knows where he is and police are seeking him, give that information to the authorities.

Let law enforcement do its work.

The RSLPF has specifically cautioned the public against confronting people based upon information circulating on social media or engaging in vigilante action.

AND PERHAPS THERE IS A BIGGER LESSON

A deportee returning to Saint Lucia may arrive with almost nothing.

Some have spent years or decades abroad. Their family relationships may have changed. Employment may be difficult. They may return to a country that is legally home but feels completely unfamiliar.

Acknowledging those realities does not excuse threats.

But it raises a question worth asking:

What happens to Saint Lucian deportees after the aircraft lands?

Is there any structured reintegration process?

Is assistance available for employment, housing, documentation or counselling where appropriate?

Are individuals assessed when circumstances suggest they may pose a risk to themselves or others?

And who follows up?

Those questions deserve attention long after this particular TikTok video disappears from people's timelines.

CHOISEUL ON THE MOVE'S BOTTOM LINE

Don't exaggerate the story.

Don't attach the man to the Third-Country Nationals programme when the available evidence says otherwise.

Don't diagnose him from a TikTok video.

Don't go looking for him yourself.

But equally, don't dismiss threatening language as entertainment simply because it happened on social media.

Let the police establish the facts and determine whether an offence has been committed.

And perhaps Government should answer the broader question this episode has exposed:

When one of our own citizens is deported back to Saint Lucia, particularly after many years overseas, what system exists to reintegrate that person into society and identify serious risks before they become everybody's problem?

That, to me, is the conversation worth having.

Choiseul on the Move

 

EC$1,131 A MONTH: LIVEABLE FOR WHOM?

There is a word in Saint Lucia's minimum wage policy that continues to trouble me.

That word is “liveable.”

Not minimum.

Not wage.

Liveable.

Saint Lucia's national minimum wage is EC$1,131 per month, or EC$6.52 an hour. It came into effect in October 2024 and Government presented it as an important step towards fairness, reducing working poverty and improving the standard of living of ordinary workers.

I welcomed the introduction of a national minimum wage.

Saint Lucia needed one.

Thousands of workers who previously had little protection against extremely low wages finally had a legal floor beneath which employers could not go.

That was progress.

But nearly two years later, I think we need to ask the question that perhaps we did not ask loudly enough at the beginning:

Can EC$1,131 really provide a liveable life in Saint Lucia?

Because there is a difference between a minimum wage and a living wage.

And calling something liveable does not automatically make it so.

LET US TALK ABOUT THE ORDINARY WORKER

Forget politics for a moment.

Think about the security guard.

The shop attendant.

The cleaner.

The labourer.

The supermarket worker.

The young mother working eight hours a day.

The father catching a bus from Choiseul to Vieux Fort or Castries every morning.

The hotel worker who has to leave home before sunrise.

The person earning EC$1,131 at the end of the month.

Before that worker buys food, the money has already started disappearing.

Transport.

Electricity.

Water.

Telephone.

Cooking gas.

Rent, if the person does not own a home.

School expenses.

Medication.

Household supplies.

And then comes food.

That EC$1,131 is not sitting in the bank waiting to build savings.

It is fighting for survival from the moment it arrives.

NOW LOOK AT THE OTHER END OF THE SCALE

According to the funded base-salary figures in the Government's 2026–2027 Estimates, the annual salaries attached to several senior public positions work out approximately as follows:

Prime Minister: EC$201,164 annually, about EC$16,764 monthly.

Government Minister: EC$154,742 annually, about EC$12,895 monthly.

Leader of the Opposition: EC$154,742 annually, about EC$12,895 monthly.

Speaker of the House: EC$92,845 annually, about EC$7,737 monthly.

Deputy Speaker: EC$70,269 annually, about EC$5,856 monthly.

An ordinary elected member works out at approximately EC$5,577 monthly, while a senator, a part-time parliamentary position, works out at approximately EC$2,510 monthly.

The Government has published its 2026–2027 Estimates as the country's official financial plan. Historical parliamentary remuneration data also independently confirms the same broad salary structure for the Prime Minister, ministers, Opposition Leader and Speaker.

Now compare that with the worker.

EC$1,131 per month.

Approximately EC$13,572 for the entire year.

And before somebody misunderstands where I am going with this, let me make something very clear.

I AM NOT SAYING POLITICIANS ARE PAID TOO MUCH

The Prime Minister carries enormous responsibility.

Ministers carry responsibility.

Parliamentarians make decisions affecting an entire country.

They should be properly compensated for that responsibility.

This is not a campaign to cut their salaries.

Actually, the comparison leads me to the opposite conclusion.

The problem is not necessarily that those at the top are earning too much.

The problem is that too many people at the bottom are earning far too little.

That distinction matters.

Because turning this into an argument about politicians' salaries allows us to avoid the more uncomfortable conversation about the wages of ordinary Saint Lucians.

DO THE ARITHMETIC

A Prime Minister's base salary is almost 15 times the minimum wage.

A minister's is more than 11 times.

The Speaker's is nearly seven times.

The Deputy Speaker earns more than five times the minimum.

Even the calculated base salary of an ordinary elected member is almost five times what a minimum-wage worker earns.

And a senator's base salary, for what is generally a part-time parliamentary position, works out at more than twice the monthly minimum wage.

Again, that does not prove those salaries are excessive.

It demonstrates something else.

EC$1,131 is very, very small money in today's Saint Lucia.

SO SHOW US THE “LIVEABLE” BASKET

This is where I believe Government should go further.

If EC$1,131 is officially described as a Minimum Liveable Wage, then publish the household budget behind the word liveable.

Show us.

How much was allocated for rent?

How much for food?

How much for transportation?

How much for electricity?

How much for water?

How much for cooking gas?

How much for telephone and internet?

How much for clothing?

How much for medication?

How much for a child's school expenses?

And after all of that, how much is the worker expected to save?

That would move this discussion away from politics and into mathematics.

Because a living wage should not be a political slogan.

It should be a calculation.

TRY EC$1,131 IN CHOISEUL

This conversation becomes even more real when we bring it home.

Imagine someone in Roblot, Saltibus, Mongouge, Piaye, Delcer or another rural community travelling to work every day.

Transport alone takes its bite.

Then the person comes home and has to contribute towards electricity, water and food.

Perhaps there are children.

Perhaps there is rent.

Perhaps there is an elderly parent in the house.

Perhaps the refrigerator breaks.

Perhaps somebody gets sick.

Perhaps school asks for another book, uniform or contribution.

What happens then?

At EC$1,131 monthly, there isn't much room between managing and crisis.

One unexpected expense can destroy the entire month's budget.

That is not financial security.

That is survival.

AND LET US NOT FORGET WHAT A JOB REQUIRES

Sometimes we speak about wages as though workers simply wake up and collect money.

Working costs money.

You need clothing.

Transportation.

Lunch.

Sometimes childcare.

A phone.

Basic grooming.

And increasingly, internet access.

Before some workers even begin contributing to their household, they have already spent part of the wage simply getting themselves to work and remaining employable.

That reality must be part of any serious discussion about a living wage.

WHAT SHOULD THE MINIMUM BE?

I will not pull a figure out of the air and pretend it is scientific.

That would be no better than the politics I am questioning.

But I will say this.

EC$1,131 should now be reviewed.

Government should commission and publish an updated cost-of-living basket showing what it actually costs a single working adult to maintain a basic but decent standard of living in Saint Lucia.

From there we can have an intelligent national discussion about whether the figure should be EC$1,300, EC$1,500, EC$1,600 or higher.

Personally, I would find it very difficult to describe anything around EC$1,100 as genuinely liveable under present-day conditions.

But let the numbers speak.

And once a proper living-wage figure is established, it should not remain frozen for years while prices continue climbing.

It should be reviewed regularly and linked in some way to changes in the cost of living.

BUSINESSES HAVE A SIDE TO THIS STORY TOO

There is another reality we cannot ignore.

Many small Saint Lucian businesses are struggling too.

A shop in Choiseul does not have the same financial resources as a large hotel, bank or multinational operation.

So increasing wages substantially overnight without considering small employers could result in reduced hours, layoffs, higher prices or businesses closing altogether.

That would help nobody.

This therefore cannot simply be:

“Raise the minimum wage tomorrow.”

Government may have to examine tax relief, productivity support, lower business costs and transitional assistance for genuinely vulnerable small enterprises.

But protecting businesses cannot become a permanent excuse for keeping workers poor.

A business model that depends indefinitely on a full-time worker remaining unable to meet basic living expenses deserves scrutiny too.

A FAIR DAY'S WORK MUST MEAN SOMETHING

Government itself has used the phrase “a fair day's work for a fair day's pay.”

I agree.

Completely.

Workers must turn up.

Workers must be productive.

Workers must give employers value.

But fairness cannot travel in only one direction.

If we demand a fair day's work from the employee, then the employee has every right to ask:

What is a fair day's pay?

Not a luxury wage.

Not a politician's wage.

Not a salary that buys vacations and expensive vehicles.

Just enough that an honest person working full time can feed himself, travel to work, keep the lights on, handle basic necessities and still retain some dignity when the month ends.

That should not be a radical demand.

THE QUESTION IS STILL WAITING

Saint Lucia deserves credit for finally establishing a national minimum wage.

That was overdue and necessary.

But establishing the floor was never supposed to end the conversation.

It should have started another one.

Two years later, perhaps the question we now need to ask is no longer:

Do we have a minimum wage?

We do.

The question is:

Can a Saint Lucian actually live on it?

And if the answer is no, then we should have the courage to stop hiding behind the word “liveable.”

Call it what it is: a minimum.

Then let us get to work determining what an ordinary Saint Lucian worker actually needs to live.

Not merely survive.

We can do better.

Choiseul on the Move

#SaintLucia #MinimumWage #LivingWage #Workers #CostOfLiving #Choiseul #ChoiseulOnTheMove

 

MERISSA’S DEATH SHOULD TROUBLE ALL OF US: A MESSAGE TO THE YOUNG WOMEN OF CHOISEUL-SALTIBUS

There are some stories you read and simply move on.

Then there are others that stay with you.

The reported death of 21-year-old Merissa Auguste of Boguis, Babonneau is one of those stories.

Merissa had reportedly been missing since September 9. Sadly, reports now indicate that her body has been found. There are also disturbing allegations surrounding the circumstances of her death, including reports that she may have been sexually assaulted and beaten before being killed.

Those details remain matters for the police and investigators to confirm, and we should be careful not to turn a family's grief into social-media speculation.

But one thing is already certain.

A young woman has lost her life.

And somewhere tonight, a family is trying to understand how somebody they loved walked out into the world and never returned home.

That should trouble every one of us.

This Is Not Just A Babonneau Story

It would be easy for those of us in Choiseul and Saltibus to read this story, shake our heads, say how terrible it is, and continue with our day.

But tragedies like this must force us to think closer to home.

Our daughters travel to Castries, Vieux Fort, Soufriere and other parts of Saint Lucia for work, school, appointments and entertainment.

Some finish work late.

Some depend on public transportation.

Some accept rides from people they know casually.

Some meet people they first encountered online.

Some simply believe that because Saint Lucia is small, they are relatively safe.

Unfortunately, small island does not automatically mean safe island.

And that is the difficult conversation we need to have.

To The Young Women Of Choiseul And Saltibus

Choiseul on the Move wants to speak directly to you.

Not to frighten you.

Not to suggest that you should stop enjoying your lives.

But because sometimes one small precaution can make a difference.

When you are going somewhere, let somebody know where you are going.

If you are meeting someone for the first time, especially someone you met online, tell a relative or close friend who you are meeting and where.

If you accept a ride and something doesn't feel right, share your location, vehicle registration number or other information with somebody you trust.

Keep your phone charged when possible.

If plans suddenly change, send a quick message home.

And perhaps most importantly, trust your instincts.

Sometimes we remain in uncomfortable situations because we don't want to appear rude.

Forget that.

You do not owe anybody politeness at the expense of your safety.

If something feels wrong, leave.

If somebody's behaviour changes and you become uncomfortable, leave.

If somebody becomes controlling, aggressive or threatening, seek help.

You would rather explain later why you overreacted than have your family wishing you had.

But Women Cannot Carry This Burden Alone

There is something else that needs saying.

Every time a woman is attacked, we immediately start producing lists telling women what they should have done.

Don't walk alone.

Don't go there.

Don't accept that ride.

Don't dress this way.

Don't trust that person.

Yes, personal safety matters.

But we must be very careful not to make women responsible for the violence committed against them.

The bigger question remains:

Why are there men among us who believe they have the right to abuse, assault or kill women?

That conversation must begin in our homes.

It must begin with our boys.

Respect for women cannot start when a young man turns 25.

It must be taught when he is five.

Our sons must learn that rejection is not humiliation.

A woman saying no is not an insult.

A relationship ending is not permission for revenge.

Jealousy is not love.

Possession is not love.

Control is not love.

Violence is certainly not love.

Young Men, You Have A Role Too

To the young men of Choiseul-Saltibus, there is something you can do.

Look out for the women around you.

If your friend is harassing a woman, don't encourage him.

If somebody tells you that he intends to hurt a woman, don't laugh it off.

If you see a woman clearly uncomfortable in a situation, check whether she needs help.

Sometimes preventing violence begins long before the police arrive.

It begins when somebody decides not to remain silent.

Parents Must Keep Communication Open

Parents also have a role.

Our children grow older and naturally want independence.

But we must create relationships where our daughters and sons feel comfortable telling us where they are going, who they are meeting and when something doesn't feel right.

If every conversation becomes interrogation and punishment, eventually they stop telling us anything.

And sometimes that silence can become dangerous.

We need communication without unnecessary judgement.

Let The Police Investigation Establish The Truth

There will undoubtedly be rumours surrounding Merissa's death.

Some may turn out to be true.

Others may not.

This is where we must exercise restraint.

A grieving family deserves answers, not Facebook investigators creating theories from incomplete information.

Let the Royal Saint Lucia Police Force investigate.

Anyone with genuine information that could assist investigators should pass that information to the authorities rather than simply circulating it through WhatsApp groups.

Justice requires facts.

A Young Woman Should Be Able To Come Home

At the end of all of this, the issue is really quite simple.

A young woman should be able to leave her home in the morning.

Go to work.

Go to school.

Visit friends.

Attend an event.

Meet somebody.

Live her life.

And return safely to the people who love her.

That should not be considered too much to expect in Saint Lucia.

So tonight, Choiseul on the Move joins the rest of the country in expressing sympathy to the family and loved ones of Merissa Auguste.

May they find strength during what must be an unbearable time.

And to every young woman reading this in Choiseul, Saltibus, Roblot, Piaye, La Fargue, Debreuil and the surrounding communities:

Enjoy your life. Chase your dreams. Go to school. Go to work. Go out with your friends. But remain aware. Tell somebody where you are. Look out for each other. And never ignore that inner voice telling you something isn't right.

We cannot remove every danger from the world.

But as communities, families and friends, we can become much better at protecting one another.

Rest in peace, Merissa.

Gone far too soon. 🕊️

 

CHOISEUL, DON’T JUST GIVE US ANOTHER FETE. GIVE US SOMETHING WE CAN OWN.

That “Something Big” poster has people guessing. Choiseul on the Move wants to put another idea on the table.

By Choiseul on the Move

That poster has certainly done its job.

“Something big is coming to Choiseul this Thanksgiving Weekend.”

Since it started making the rounds on Facebook, everybody has become an investigator.

Carnival?

J’ouvert?

Blotje en Chwazey?

A pageant?

A big dance?

The comments are coming, and that is good. It tells us people are interested. People want something happening in Choiseul.

But Choiseul on the Move wants to throw something different into the pot.

What about a Gospel Music Festival?

And before somebody quickly says, “Gospel? That boring,” hear me out.

I am not talking about putting four singers on a stage, singing a few church songs, saying thank you very much and everybody goes home.

No.

I am talking about something BIG.

A proper Choiseul Thanksgiving Gospel Festival and Song Competition with serious prizes, live bands, choirs, solo artistes, young people, original songs, Kwéyòl gospel music, food, craft and eventually a major Saint Lucian or regional gospel artiste closing the show.

Something people will mark on their calendar every year.

Something people from Vieux Fort, Laborie, Soufrière, Castries and Gros Islet will drive to Choiseul to see.

Something Choiseul can call ours.

Before We Run Behind Another Carnival, Remember Our History

One thing I have learnt over the years is that sometimes we forget too quickly.

Choiseul has been producing cultural activities around September and October for a very long time.

And when you go digging into the history, you realise that the Thanksgiving weekend itself has significance.

Back in 2013, organisers of Blotje en Chwazey deliberately placed the climax of the festival around the October Thanksgiving weekend.

Why?

Because they wanted Choiseul to have its own space.

Not Jazz.

Not national Carnival.

Something Choiseul could develop.

That year's programme included a music festival, Miss Choiseul Pageant, arts and agriculture activities, J’ouvert and other cultural events.

The people organising it at the time even made the point that they did not want Blotje en Chwazey to simply become another Carnival.

Think about that.

Thirteen years later, here we are again talking about Thanksgiving weekend.

And once again we have an opportunity to decide what Choiseul wants to be known for.

We Already Know How To Fete

Nobody has to teach Saint Lucians how to fete.

We have Carnival.

We have J’ouvert.

We have Dennery Segment.

We have soca events.

We have fetes almost every weekend somewhere on the island.

Put music, rum and a DJ together and Saint Lucians will find the place.

Nothing wrong with that.

But must every community event eventually become the same thing?

Bass. Bar. Soca. Jump-up. Go home.

Then next year we start over.

Choiseul should be thinking bigger than simply putting another fete onto Saint Lucia's already crowded entertainment calendar.

If this mystery event turns out to be Carnival or J’ouvert, I wish the organisers every success.

But I also want us to start discussing what Choiseul can create that has a real identity.

Something another community might look at five years from now and say:

“We need something like what Choiseul has.”

That is when you know you have created something.

Why Gospel? Why Thanksgiving?

To me the answer is staring us right in the face.

It is Thanksgiving.

A time associated with gratitude.

Family.

Reflection.

Faith.

Community.

Giving thanks for life itself.

So why would Gospel Music be strange?

In fact, Saint Lucia has already included gospel events in Creole Heritage Month activities before. A Kwéyòl Gospel Fiesta was held as part of the national October cultural programme years ago.

So this is not some foreign concept being pulled out of a hat.

The foundation is already there.

And Choiseul has churches everywhere.

Catholic.

Seventh-day Adventist.

Pentecostal.

Evangelical.

Baptist.

Church of God.

And others.

Those churches contain singers.

Musicians.

Choirs.

Keyboard players.

Drummers.

Songwriters.

Young people with tremendous talent who hardly ever get a serious stage outside their church.

Why can't Choiseul create that stage?

And Please, Make It A Competition

This is where I would really like the organisers to shake things up.

Don't just invite singers.

Create competition.

Give people something to work towards.

Imagine this.

Choiseul Thanksgiving Gospel Festival

Best Gospel Soloist

Best Gospel Group

Best Church Choir

Best Youth Gospel Performer

Best Original Gospel Song

And here's the one I would really love:

BEST ORIGINAL KWÉYÒL GOSPEL SONG

Now tell me that would not be something.

Choiseul could challenge Saint Lucian musicians to WRITE.

Not just sing somebody else's song.

Write something new.

Write about faith.

Write about life.

Write about struggle.

Write about the communities we live in.

Write about Saint Lucia.

Write it in Kwéyòl.

Imagine those songs being recorded afterwards.

Imagine Kool Vybz and other stations playing them.

Imagine them going onto YouTube, Spotify and other platforms.

Suddenly a one-night festival has created new Saint Lucian music.

That is culture.

Put A Real Prize Behind It

And please don't ask people to rehearse for two months for a trophy and $200.

If we are calling it something big, make it big.

Go after corporate Saint Lucia.

Banks.

Credit unions.

Telecommunications companies.

Construction companies.

Supermarkets.

Insurance companies.

The Tourism Authority.

Ministry of Culture.

Private sponsors.

Put together a meaningful purse.

What if the winning original song received $10,000?

Now people start writing.

What if Best Choir carried $5,000?

What if a youth category gave a scholarship or musical equipment?

Now parents become interested.

Churches become interested.

Music teachers become interested.

Young people start rehearsing.

And the standard rises every year.

But Don't Stop At The Stage

This is Choiseul.

We have something many places would love to have.

Craft.

For generations Choiseul has been recognised as one of Saint Lucia's great centres of traditional craft.

Basketry.

Pottery.

Woodwork.

Coconut products.

Traditional foods.

Agriculture.

So make the festival bigger than music.

During the day, give our craftspeople tents.

Give farmers space.

Let local cooks sell food.

Let small businesses display their products.

Let young entrepreneurs participate.

Then as evening approaches, the Gospel Festival begins.

Now the money is not only going to the promoter.

The vendor earns.

The farmer earns.

The craft producer earns.

The taxi driver earns.

The shop earns.

The guest house earns.

Choiseul earns.

That is how festivals begin to make economic sense.

And The Young People Must Be Right In The Middle

Choiseul has been investing again in music.

We have seen renewed interest through programmes involving young musicians and the Choiseul Community Symphony.

Our Jazz Fiesta has also shown what can happen when local talent is placed alongside established performers.

So why not build another platform around that?

A 14-year-old singer from Saltibus should be able to dream of standing on that Thanksgiving stage.

A little choir from Roblot should be able to compete.

A young keyboard player from La Fargue should have somewhere to demonstrate what he has been practising.

A songwriter sitting at home in Mongouge should have a reason to finish that song.

That is what community development looks like too.

Not everything for young people has to involve a football or cricket.

And Yes, Christmas Is Another Opportunity

If Thanksgiving is already committed to something else, then let us look at Christmas.

But again, don't simply call it a Christmas concert.

Give it character.

Imagine a Choiseul Christmas Music Festival built around original Saint Lucian Christmas songs.

Kwéyòl Christmas music.

Gospel.

Séwénal.

Choirs.

Traditional instruments.

Young performers.

A songwriting competition.

Now we would be producing music that could live for generations.

Because let us admit something.

Every Christmas we hear many of the same foreign Christmas songs.

Beautiful songs, yes.

But where are the new Saint Lucian Christmas classics?

Why couldn't some of them come from Choiseul?

This Is The Conversation I Want The Poster To Start

Choiseul on the Move does not know what is behind the “Something Big” poster.

Maybe the organisers already have something wonderful planned.

I hope so.

And I congratulate them for creating interest without even announcing the event.

That alone is good marketing.

But while everybody is guessing, I want us to use the opportunity to think beyond one weekend.

What does Choiseul want to own?

Because successful communities eventually create signature events.

Soufrière has things associated with Soufrière.

Gros Islet has things associated with Gros Islet.

Dennery has built a musical identity recognised far beyond Dennery.

Choiseul has history.

Choiseul has culture.

Choiseul has musicians.

Choiseul has craft.

Choiseul has food.

Choiseul has churches.

Choiseul has young talent.

Choiseul has locations.

And most importantly, Choiseul has people.

What we need is an idea big enough to pull those things together.

So Here Is The Challenge

Whatever is coming this Thanksgiving weekend, let it be successful.

But going forward, I am throwing this one directly onto the table for the Choiseul/Saltibus Village Council, Choiseul Events, cultural organisations, churches, musicians, businesses, sponsors and our Parliamentary Representative:

LET CHOISEUL BUILD A THANKSGIVING GOSPEL FESTIVAL.

Make it competitive.

Make it national.

Make Kwéyòl part of it.

Give serious prizes.

Bring in a major gospel artiste.

Give our young people a stage.

Give our vendors business.

Give our craftspeople exposure.

Give our musicians something to create.

And build it year after year until when somebody anywhere in Saint Lucia hears the words “Thanksgiving weekend,” one of the first things that comes to mind is:

CHOISEUL.

We don't always have to copy what is already happening somewhere else.

Sometimes we have to be brave enough to start something.

Something big.

And maybe the biggest thing Choiseul can do is not simply organise another event.

Maybe it is time for Choiseul to create a tradition.