Below are TWO examples to guide you:
.png)
✔️ Only place ONE X next to ONE candidate
✔️ Keep your mark inside the candidate’s box
✔️ A spoiled ballot cannot be counted
✔️ If you need help on Election Day, ask the presiding officer — assistance is your right
Let’s make every vote count!
Choiseul/Saltibus—be informed, be confident, and vote correctly.
Today, we proudly honour our Man of the Year — a leader whose impact goes far beyond construction and business.
👉 Read the full tribute here:
https://rayneau.blogspot.com/2025/11/rayneau-gajadhar-saint-lucias-man-of.html?m=1
With Saint Lucians heading to the polls on December 1, many are now asking: Will this political earthquake in St. Vincent influence the mood and momentum in Saint Lucia? Let’s take a closer look.
Across the Caribbean, elections tend to feed off each other. When a long-standing government falls — especially one that many thought “could never lose” — it creates a psychological shift among voters in neighbouring islands.
The NDP’s win tells a compelling regional story:
People are increasingly willing to break long political traditions when they feel their economic and social needs aren’t being met.
This alone could energize certain voter groups in Saint Lucia, particularly those who have been quietly dissatisfied but unsure whether real change is possible.
Many undecided Saint Lucians have been torn between sticking with what they know or taking a chance on something new.
But now they are looking across the sea and seeing Vincentians making that leap.
Here’s the difference this makes:
When your neighbour successfully chooses a new direction, it makes the idea more real — and more possible — for you.
Political parties in Saint Lucia will quickly adjust their messages following the SVG outcome.
But one thing is clear:
The St. Vincent results have rewritten the narrative heading into our final campaign weekend.
Cost of living. Food prices. Youth unemployment.
These issues hammered Ralph Gonsalves in SVG — and they’re hammering Saint Lucia too.
Voters now have a real-time example of a population that voted primarily on bread-and-butter issues. This could amplify economic concerns as the centre of conversation in Saint Lucia over the next few days.
NDP’s victory is a reminder that no government is safe, no matter how entrenched.
For Saint Lucia’s political class, the SVG landslide is a warning flare:
Saint Lucians are watching exactly how quickly a tide can turn when voters feel ignored or taken for granted.
While Saint Lucia is not St. Vincent — our political culture, party loyalties, and national issues differ — the psychological impact of last night’s election cannot be ignored.
What happened in St. Vincent has injected a new energy into our region. It has reshaped the final days of campaigning here at home. And it has, without question, intensified the curiosity of Saint Lucian voters who now want to see whether the “SVG effect” will spill over into our own ballot boxes.
December 1 now feels even bigger.
The region is watching.
And Saint Lucia may very well be the next chapter in this unfolding Caribbean story of political renewal.
Behind the smiles at church, in the shop line, or sitting on a roadside bench, there’s a quiet struggle playing out every day — stretching small social security payments, paying for doctor visits and medication, and trying to retire with dignity in a world that’s getting more expensive by the month.
Let’s talk honestly about it.
For most seniors in Choiseul/Saltibus, the main lifeline is a monthly pension from the National Insurance Corporation (NIC) or a small government assistance grant.
The problem?
Prices have gone up on everything:
Many older people are left doing harsh calculations:
“Do I pay the light bill… or do I buy my tablets?”
“Can I afford fresh fruits this week… or must I just buy flour and rice?”
Some receive strong support from children and family. Others are alone or have relatives who are struggling just as much. Pride also plays a role — many elders don’t like to “beg,” so they quietly cut back on meals, skip important purchases, or run up credit at the village shops.
People often say, “But health care is free at the public hospital.”
In real life, older residents know that staying healthy still costs money:
For a retired farmer or shopkeeper on a small pension, a single test or private consultation can wipe out half the month’s income. Many seniors in our district “self-manage” serious illnesses because they simply cannot afford consistent follow-up care.
Retirement in Choiseul/Saltibus is not always a rocking chair and a peaceful sea breeze.
A lot of older residents:
Very few had access to private pensions, long-term savings plans, or financial planning when they were younger. Many worked in informal jobs: farming, construction, domestic work, shop work, or small hustles that never contributed to NIC.
Now, in their 60s, 70s, and 80s, they are facing:
Money and health are only part of the story.
There is also:
Some older residents stay strong through faith, community groups, church, or friendly neighbours who check in and share a meal. But we must admit: too many are suffering quietly behind closed doors.
If we care about our elders — the same people who built Choiseul/Saltibus with their hands, their sweat, and their sacrifices — then we can’t just shrug and say, “That’s life.”
We need:
Most importantly, we need to listen.
Sit with the older people in Roblot, Piaye, Mongouge, Dacretin, Caffiere, Saltibus, Delcer — and ask them what help they truly need. The solutions for retirement security, health care, and social support must include their voices.
Because a community that honours its elders is a community that respects its own future.
But beyond the polished delivery, his statement carried layers of meaning: part warning, part reminder, and part repositioning. This wasn’t just about talking to the nation for old times’ sake. It felt like a deliberate move to influence the mood of the country in the final stretch before a critical general election.
Pilgrim presented himself as the elder statesman returning to offer guidance. He spoke of national unity, political maturity and the need for leaders to rise above petty division. The tone was gentle, reflective and reassuring – almost nostalgic for a different political era.
Still, this was no harmless “hello.” The subtext was clear: “I am still here. I am still watching. And my voice still matters.” In a campaign where credibility and experience are on the ballot, that reminder is not accidental.
Pilgrim avoided direct attacks, but he did not avoid critique. Through references to rising frustration, declining respect in public debate and the need for honest leadership, he gently pointed at the shortcomings of the current political climate.
He did it in classic Pilgrim style – not by calling names, but by painting a picture of what leadership should look like. Anyone listening carefully would have heard the message: the country deserves better than noise, anger and ego.
One of the strongest themes in the speech was stability. In a time of early elections, unfinished national projects and growing anxiety over health care and the economy, Pilgrim stepped into the frame as the calm, steady hand.
Whether you agree with his past record or not, this address clearly aimed to remind Saint Lucians of a time when he was the one steering the ship – and to invite comparison with the present.
Interestingly, he spoke directly to the youth. Pilgrim urged young Saint Lucians to register, to vote, and to demand accountability from those who seek power. That section was not just sentimental; it was strategic.
The youth vote will help shape the outcome of the next election. By reaching out to them, Pilgrim positioned himself not just as yesterday’s leader, but as someone still engaged with tomorrow’s electorate.
Perhaps the most important line of the speech was his call for leaders to put country before ego, and people before party. It sounded like simple wisdom, but it landed like a quiet rebuke to the entire political class.
To many listeners, it raised questions about decision-making at the top – including the timing of the election and the state of key national projects. Others heard it as a challenge to the Opposition as well, urging them to keep their own politics clean and focused on issues.
The timing of this address is no coincidence. With days to go before the polls, Pilgrim’s statement:
Social media reactions show that both sides tried to claim parts of his message to suit their narrative. That alone tells you how carefully the speech was crafted.
In a season of noise, slogans and sometimes vicious attacks, Michael “Mikey” Pilgrim stepped in with a calm, measured reminder of what leadership is supposed to sound like. His address may not have contained fiery reveals or dramatic threats, but it quietly changed the temperature of the conversation.
Whether you see him as a mentor, a critic or a political operator, one thing is certain: he chose his moment carefully – and Saint Lucia was listening.
Choiseul on the Move will continue to track the national mood, the speeches, and the strategies as election day approaches. Stay tuned for more in-depth breakdowns and community perspectives.
With just four days before Saint Lucia goes to the polls, the Choiseul/Saltibus race is shaping up to be one of the most unpredictable and electrifying contests of the 2025 general election. Both candidates—Keithson “Kiffo” Charles (SLP) and Bradley “Flex” Felix (UWP)—are digging in for a final push, and based on what we’re observing on the ground, this race could go right down to the wire.
.png)
This is not a prediction—that comes on November 30th—but an honest, balanced look at where things seem to be heading as of now.
Delcer continues to stand firm behind Flex. He has deep roots there, and the numbers traditionally start in his favour.
Yes, whispers are circulating that Kiffo is “making moves” in the area, but many residents believe the few new faces showing him love might be non-voters simply playing along.
Delcer remains UWP’s safest box.
Mongouge is undeniably leaning red this cycle.
Kiffo is expected to take this box comfortably, but the momentum isn’t at the level it could have been.
Why?
Some residents quietly resent the lack of support Kiffo’s family gave to a former UWP hopeful from the area. That issue—small to some, big to others—has cooled what could have been a roaring Mongouge wave.
Still, Mongouge belongs to Kiffo.
La Fargue is once again the heart of the fight.
Right now, it appears to be leaning toward Kiffo, with signs that he may surpass Pauline’s 2021 performance.
One reason? Cedars—that tight-knit enclave seems ready to throw stronger support behind the SLP this time around, shifting the balance.
Dacretin looks like a battlefield—plain and simple.
Two highly influential community figures, one on each side, are working overtime to secure their candidate’s victory.
At this stage:
It could go either way.
These two polling divisions appear to be leaning toward Flex—and not because of party loyalty alone.
Residents are still upset that their multipurpose centers have remained closed for over two years.
That frustration is real, and it’s translating into votes.
Unless something dramatic happens, both boxes favour Flex as a form of punishment for what many view as neglect.
There’s no debate here—Jetrine is overwhelmingly behind Kiffo.
His support there is deep and dependable.
Dugard is lining up behind Kiffo in a big way.
This is expected to be another one of his strong boxes district-wide.
Saltibus is the box to watch.
Rumors indicate Flex may see increased support, mainly because many relatives of former candidate Pauline—who had leaned SLP last time—may return home to UWP in this election.
If this shift holds, Saltibus becomes the game-changer.
The race is tight—tighter than many expected.
Both candidates have strengths. Both have weaknesses. And both have pockets of passionate supporters.
At this point, the election in Choiseul/Saltibus will not be decided by emotion or noise—it will be decided by turnout, ground strategy, and whether each candidate can protect their strongholds while chipping into the opponent’s territory.
This is simply our analysis—not gospel, not prophecy.
But one thing is certain:
Choiseul/Saltibus is heading into a nail-biting finish.
Stay tuned for our Final Predictions Post on November 30.
The SLP opens its scorecard with a strong argument:
the economy has been stabilised since 2021.
Their claims include:
THE MESSAGE:
“You can trust us with the economy — we repaired it and protected households.”
The UWP narrative is the opposite.
They argue that SLP slowed the economy and that Saint Lucia needs bigger, bolder, more aggressive expansion.
Their plans include:
THE MESSAGE:
“The country needs speed, scale, and ambition — and only we deliver that.”
| Issue | SLP Approach | UWP Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Fiscal Balance | Stabilise, reduce deficit, move to surplus | Grow economy aggressively |
| Taxes | Relief for households, higher tax exemption | Broader tax cuts |
| Jobs | Youth entrepreneurship, gradual growth | Large investment + fast job creation |
| Investment Style | Measured, accountable, community-focused | Big projects and PPPs |
| Tone | “We delivered already.” | “We will launch bigger things.” |
If a voter values stability, debt control, and steady improvement, SLP’s message resonates.
If a voter prefers rapid development, large-scale investment, and tax-cut-driven growth, UWP’s message stands out.
Saint Lucia must choose between two philosophies:
Both offer benefits — but both come with different risks and trade-offs.
